<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://imcjms.com/public/assets/rss.css" ?><rss version="2.0">
<channel>
    <title>IMC Journal of Medical Science</title>
    <link>https://imcjms.com/public</link>
    <description>Ibrahim Medical College Journal of Medical Science</description>

                        <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Management strategy for control and prevention of
SARS-CoV-2 infection in hospital settings - a brief review]]></title>

                                    <author><![CDATA[Ishrat Binte Aftab]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Akash Ahmed]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Sinthia Kabir Mumu]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[M Mahboob Hossain]]></author>
                
                <link data-url="https://imcjms.com/public/registration/journal_full_text/410">
    https://imcjms.com/public/registration/journal_full_text/410
</link>
                <pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2022 14:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
                <category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
                <comments><![CDATA[IMC J Med Sci 2022; 16(2): 006]]></comments>
                <description>Abstract
The current
pandemic of COVID-19 has spread worldwide rapidly. Many countries are
struggling with the third pandemic wave despite having the vaccine distribution
to frontline workers and people at high risk. Several studies have suggested a high
possibility of hospital-acquired COVID-19. Therefore, it is vital to have
proper recommendations and guidelines to prevent COVID-19 transmission in hospitals.
Eliminating hospital-acquired infection is impossible, but reducing the rate
and severity is possible by following appropriate guidelines. This paper
reviews the strategies and recommendations that can be helpful for a hospital
authority to control and prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection among the patients and
healthcare workers.
IMC J Med Sci 2022; 16(2): 006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55010/imcjms.16.016
*Correspondence: Akash Ahmed,
Department of Mathematics &amp;amp; Natural Sciences, BRAC University, Dhaka,
Bangladesh. Email: akash.ahmed@bracu.ac.bd
&amp;nbsp;
Introduction
Coronavirus
disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome
coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has spread worldwide at an exponential rate since its
detection in Wuhan, China in December 2019. By March 2022, about 500 million
people around the world had COVID-19 and among them, there were 6.2 million
deaths [1]. Globally, vaccines are distributed yet the cases and death continue
to exist. Leaders and policymakers are already claiming to have scarcity of
intensive care units and other healthcare facilities even in developed
countries.
Even though there
is not enough empirical evidence suggesting hospital as a transmission spot for
COVID-19, there are case study analyses that show evidence of hospital acquired
Covid-19. Marago and colleagues [2] conducted a retrospective case analysis in
the General District Hospital in the North West of England and found the
prevalence of hospital-acquired COVID-19 up to 16.2%. In a meta-analysis of
cases from China-based databases, Zhou et al. showed [3] that the proportion of
COVID-19 acquired in a hospital setting was 44%. The majority of the infected
person was healthcare workers [3]. In another retrospective study performed by
Rickman et al. [4] at a University Hospital London, 11% (47/435) Covid-19 cases
were confirmed hospital-acquired and among them, the mortality rate was 36%. An
observational study with COVID-19 cases showed among 1564 patients admitted,
12.5% were hospital-acquired where the mortality rate was 27% [5]. Even though
these studies have few limitations, it is evident from the official data that 12-15%
COVID-19 cases were nosocomial in origin [6].
Therefore, to
prevent the transmission of COVID-19 among the hospital patients and healthcare
workers, hospitals all over the world have taken different measures based on
their local resources. The WHO (World Health Organization) and CDC (Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention) have published recommendations on control of
SARS-CoV-2 infection. Unfortunately, most of the recommendations are based on
previous SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome) and MERS (Middle East
Respiratory Syndrome) outbreaks. However, specialists, scientists, front-line
doctors working with COVID-19 patients have made recommendations to prevent
spread of COVID-19 in hospital settings. The aim of this paper is to review the
available recommendations and information that can help preventing hospital-acquired
COVID-19 transmission.
&amp;nbsp;
Methods
A thorough search
was conducted on Google scholar and MEDLINE through specific keywords, e.g.
“hospital management during COVID-19”, “infection control in hospital during
COVID-19”, “COVID-19 transmission in hospital”, “lab considerations during
corona outbreak”, “healthcare worker safety in COVID-19”. Papers were also
handpicked from references.
&amp;nbsp;
Administrative control
In a healthcare
facility, it is important to have a strong administrative control to keep the
workflow uninterrupted and modify if and when necessary. It is the most
essential level of hierarchy to reduce the COVID-19 exposure to uninfected
people [7]. Its responsibility includes, reminding staff to take necessary
precaution and monitoring them when they are on duty [8]. Some hospitals have
established real time monitoring where the monitoring is done on computer
screen in a separate room [9]. Lai et al [7] suggest, in the time of COVID-19,
it is crucial for administrators to reduce the patient attendance as much as
possible and suspend the elective clinical services to avoid viral
transmission. It is also essential for keeping the resources available such as
inpatient beds, staff and medical equipment to fight against emergency outbreak
[7]. In addition, unique shifting system such as, working at different time and
location, doing long shifts and keeping backup staff ready can limit exposure,
save protective equipment and keep workflow uninterrupted [10-12]. All medical
documents such as, physicians’ order, medical records, consent form, lab
results and nursing materials is better to make paperless, as explained by
Huang et al [9].
&amp;nbsp;
Screening and zoning
In order to keep
the health workers and uninfected patients safe, a thorough screening process
is important. A triage station should be set up to identify fever patients
before they enter the clinical area or outpatient gateway [7,12]. Patients or
hospital staff entering the hospital should be screened for fever using
infra-red thermometers [7]. The clinical area of important department should be
divided into clean, semi-contaminated and contaminated zones depending on the
patient occupancy time, ventilation condition and risk of exposure [12].
&amp;nbsp;
Safety of health workers 
Health workers
are the most important asset in COVID-19 pandemic and during any disease outbreak
or epidemic [8,13]. Therefore, it is crucial to protect them first from
acquiring infection for the greater benefit of whole population. It is
recommended that healthcare worker should report any symptoms that may be associated
with COVID-19 and their travel history after returning from vacation [7]. A
large tertiary hospital of Singapore measures and records electronically the body
temperature of their medical staff twice a day [14]. Huang et al. [8] believe education
regarding infection control and personal safety should reach every medical
personnel. The safety information includes use of personal protective equipment
(PPE), hand hygiene, ward disinfection, medical waste management, and
sterilization of patient-care devices and management of occupational exposure
[9]. The Joint Task Force of the Chinese Society of Anesthesiology and the
Chinese Association of Anesthesiologists mention in their recommendation that
highest level of personal precautions includes a disposable surgical cap,
test-fit N95 masks or respirators, gloves, goggles or face shield, gown, and
fluid-resistant shoe covers [13]. The key element of this precaution is the
full coverage of the head and facial skin. However, Bourouiba [15] in his
article suggests that mask and other protective equipment should be able to
withstand high-momentum multi-phase turbulent gas cloud ejected with a sneeze
or a cough where the virus is trapped. A surgical mask along with N95 in
addition with goggles and face shield works well as protection [8,13]. Some
clinicians made the suggestion of using powdered air-purifying respirator
(PAPRs) in aerosol generating conditions, although poses limited evidence and
logistical challenges [16]. Even though laboratory study shows that N95 mask
gives higher protection than FFP2 and FFP3 (filtering facepiece), a
recent meta-analysis shows no significant difference [17]. It is advisable to
use double-gloving as a standard practice to minimize spread through fomite
after intubation [18]. There is a potential risk of contamination during the
donning (putting on) and doffing (removing) of PPE, thus, requires thorough
training (using teaching video, infographic etc.), as explained by Phua and
colleagues [16]. Health worker who are pregnant should have special attention
and work in a clean zone [8,10].
&amp;nbsp;
Infection control in hospital 
Anesthesia and
operating room (OR) management of a hospital play a big role in the infection
control procedure during an airborne viral pandemic like COVID-19. Multiple
studies have confirmed that COVID-19 transmission occurs through air droplets;
therefore, all aerosol-generating procedures should take place in airborne
infection isolation room [18]. Aerosol generation typically occurs in operating
room during tracheal intubation, noninvasive ventilation (NIV), high-flow nasal
oxygen (HFNO) procedures, bronchial suctioning, airway manipulation, open
airway suctioning, bronchoscopy and sputum induction [17,19].
Coccolini [19] suggests
that during a general anesthesia, a HEPA (high-efficiency particulate air)
filter to connect to the patient end of breathing circuit and another one
between expiratory limb and anesthetic machine. Also, regional anesthesia is
preferable over general one. Even though not possible during the time of
pandemic, it is not advisable to take the patient to the post anesthesia care
unit because it may induce contamination, rather they should recover in the
room where they had surgery [11].
Awake intubation
should be avoided as it has risk of patient coughing or vomiting which is a
potential source of infection for healthcare workers [19]. Cheung and his team [18]
recommend avoiding bag mask ventilation as it generates aerosol. They recommend
using methods like bed-up-head-elevated position, airway adjunct or positive
end expiratory pressure valve. However, if bag masking is unavoidable, they
advise to use supraglottic device rather than bag mask ventilation, although no
robust evidence is available for this recommendation but this process is easy
and requires less medical staff. On the other hand, Coccolini [19] suggests using
rapid sequence intubation (RSI) in order to avoid manual ventilation. In
addition, turning off the gas flow and clamping the endotracheal tube using
forceps during the switching between portable device and ventilator may reduce
aerosolization.
For COVID-19
patients, a negative pressure environment for operating room (OR) is
recommended to reduce the spread of virus outside the room [19]. An evidence-based
study by Dexter and colleagues [11] suggest that typical hand hygiene is
insufficient to control infection in operating room. They also suggest that a
multilayered approach such as improved hand hygiene, environmental cleaning,
vascular care, patient decolonization, and surveillance optimization can
minimize perioperative infection for bacterial and viral pathogens. In addition
to that, high air exchange cycle rate (25 cycles/h) can significantly downscale
the viral load within ORs. After the surgery, patient is advised to recover in
the OR so that the contamination stays in one room; however, during this
pandemic it may not be possible to institute such measure in all hospitals. To
eliminate the risk of circuit contamination, the anesthetic breathing circuit
and the canister of soda lime needs to be discarded after completion of surgery
[19].
Along with the aforementioned
procedures, there are other aerosol generating processes in the ICU such as,
administration of nebulized treatment, endotracheal intubation, disconnecting
the patient from the ventilator, non-invasive positive pressure ventilation,
tracheostomy, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) [20]. Recent reports show
that acute cardiac injury can happen in 7% patients with COVID-19 [21]. Also,
their treatment poses infection risk. Active CPR may generate aerosols of
respiratory secretions that may result in spread of infection. Therefore,
Alhazzani and colleagues have suggested considering WHO recommendation of using
negative pressure rooms with 12 air changes minimum per hour or at least 160 L/
second/patient in facilities with natural ventilation. Furthermore, they
suggest doing the endotracheal intubation by experienced personnel to reduce
the risk of infection by minimizing the number of attempts [18,20]. Restriction
on ICU visits is important, and in case of emergency, video calling is
preferable.
Radiology
department plays a significant role in the management of COVID-19 patients
during this pandemic. Therefore, contamination in this area has larger
consequences in viral spread in hospital. In order to reduce the hospital
spread of SARS-CoV-2, radiology department may be divided into four zones
namely contaminated, semi-contaminated, buffer and clean zones and each zone should
be separated from each other [8]. A provision for negative pressure CT room is
also recommended [10].
&amp;nbsp;
Immuno -suppressed patients 
Immuno-compromised
patients are in increased risk of acquiring SARS-Cov-2 infection during their
visit and stay in hospitals. Shamsi et al. [22] states that cancer patients are
considered as immune-suppressed, however, there are limited data available
related to cancer survivors and COVID-19 infection. They suggest, for some
selective patients, delaying elective surgery will be appropriate for early
asymptomatic small breast cancer tumors detected on routine screening
mammograms. It is recommended to defer breast surgery for 3 months in case it
is for atypia, prophylactic/risk-reducing surgery, reconstruction, or benign
conditions [23]. They further recommend that all uncomplicated, elective and early-stage
cancer surgery should be deferred. However, delaying elective surgery is
complex idea depending on the fact that every cancer has different disease pattern
each of which requires unique oncological multidisciplinary approach and
decision [22]. Therefore, even if there are recommendations available,
decisions on surgery should be made on case-by-case basis.
Elective surgeries
in patients with type-2 diabetes are advised to be deferred in COVID-19
pandemic situation [24]. Type-2 diabetic and obese patients are at high risk of
COVID-19 complications due to the surgical stress in recovery period. In a
retrospective study, Cao and colleagues [25] explain, pregnant women are more
susceptible to respiratory pathogens due to maternal physiologic changes and
immune suppression. Therefore, it is important to screen pregnant women for
SARS-CoV-2 before admission to reduce the transmission of virus among the
hospital staff and other patients [17,25]. Furthermore, during labor, increased
ventilation may accelerate airborne transmission, especially if the pregnant
woman has symptoms of COVID-19 lung sequelae [17]. Limited data suggest that
transplacental transmission is unlikely in women with COVID-19, therefore,
neonates are considered safe. However, to remain safe, early cord clamping and
temporary separation of the mother and newborn for minimum of 2 weeks is
recommended to reduce transmission of COVID-19 from infected mother to the
newborn. Also, breast feeding is not recommended if the mother is infected,
instead, pumped breast milk can be given [26].
&amp;nbsp;
Laboratory considerations
In an early
experience of managing emerging COVID-19 in Singapore’s tertiary institution,
Tan et al. [27] have stated that laboratory specimens should neither be
delivered by hand nor sent through pneumatic tube as it has the risk of
spillage. They have suggested the use of universal transport medium for
nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs where the swabs are dipped within 3ml of
fluid. Furthermore, they have also recommended transporting tightly capped
specimens in biohazard zip-lock bags, within a cryobox (leak-proof) which is labeled
clearly as biohazard. They have also made the recommendation of adopting WHO
guidelines of “triple packaging system” during the pandemic to prevent the
transmission. This packaging system includes a receptacle, a watertight and
leak-proof packaging to protect the receptacle and an outer layer to reduce
physical damage in transit [27].
&amp;nbsp;
Environment and equipment cleaning
Environment and equipment
cleaning are of paramount importance, especially in places where
immune-suppressed patients are handled, e.g. ICU, radiotherapy unit, OR, etc. Improved
cleaning of environment and equipment using surface disinfection and UV-C
approach is recommended as use of UV-C only may result in shadowing [11]. Huang
and colleagues [8] recommend disinfecting object surface with 1,000 mg/L
chlorine-containing disinfectant and wiping twice with 75% ethanol for non-corrosion
resistant surface, once in every 4 hours. For disinfecting equipment, they
suggest to use 2,000 mg/L chlorine-containing disinfectant. For disinfection of
room air, in general air condition is advised to turn off to reduce
transmission. When the room is suspected of being contaminated, they recommend ventilating
it well once in 4 hours. Also, their radiotherapy department uses the spraying
of ambient air with 1,000 mg/L chlorine-containing disinfectants. Ground
disinfection is done with 1,000 mg/L chlorine-containing disinfectant, once
every 4 hours. Catheterization laboratory, OR and every other area exposed to
COVID-19 patient are recommended to follow terminal cleaning after each use
[11,12]. Electro-medical equipment such as ventilator and different
radiological equipment must be cleaned (rinsed and dried) with 0.1%
chlorine-based solution [19]. After an operation, OR utensils should be cleaned
with sodium hypochlorite 1000 ppm and hydrogen peroxide vaporization or UV-C
irradiation. Hydrogen peroxide vaporization is effective against various
viruses including transmissible gastroenteritis coronavirus of pigs and UV-C irradiation
kills or inactivates aerosolized viruses [19].
&amp;nbsp;
Hospital waste management 
About 87% of a
hospital&#039;s total waste is infectious [28]. Therefore, proper technologies
should be used when managing hospital waste and waste water, especially during
a pandemic. Some of the common infectious wastes in the hospital are the feces,
vomit, and urine of the infected patients. The feces of COVID-19 infected
patients have been confirmed to contain the RNA strands of the virus and it is believed
that the fomites of the infected container to be a source of transmission [29].
Wang and his team [28] suggest that the waste water discharged from hospitals
treating COVID-19 patients also needs to be regulated as it can contaminate the
entire drainage system and even cause aerial transmissions. The large amount of
waste produced by the hospitals must be disinfected according to strict
procedures to prevent new infections among medical staffs and patients. Any
sort of waste that may have been in contact with infected patients should be
placed in easily identifiable containers for infectious-risk health waste
(IRHW). The containers must be closed and sealed before transferring them to
inactivation points. Medical staffs handling these containers should wear
personal protection equipment all times. The process of inactivation of
SARS-CoV-2 is still a relatively less studied topic. In this case, the best
action would be to adhere to the techniques used during the SARS epidemic since
the COVID-19 share significant similarities with the SARS-CoV-1. An effective
method for the inactivation of any SARS virus is the use of more than 0.5 mg/L
residual free chlorine or 2.19 mg/L residual chlorine dioxide. Chlorine and UV-C
irradiation were found as the most effective disinfectant for SARS virus.
Methods involving chlorine dioxide were second in term of performance. These
findings are in line with the recommendation made by the Ministry of Ecology
and Environment of China for treating the waste water of hospitals built for
COVID-19 patients. Chlorine base disinfectants such as liquid chlorine,
chlorine dioxide and sodium hypo-chloride with about 50mg/L of chlorine were
suggested for disinfection process. Disinfectants containing 20g/L chlorine
should be used for up to two hours to avoid all sorts of transmissions.
Pharmaceutical and chemical wastes need to be incinerated. The choice of
disinfectant and procedures will depend on the economic and feasible factors
such as amount of wastewater, existing infrastructure, cost of operation, scope
of investment and availability of the disinfectants [28].
&amp;nbsp;
Limitations of the study 
All the papers
included in this review are not peer-reviewed due to COVID-19 situation.
Additionally, safety recommendations are changing frequently as this is an
ongoing pandemic. Therefore, consistency in the information may differ with
time.
&amp;nbsp;
Conclusion
There is no fixed
precaution that can eliminate the possibility of hospital-acquired COVID-19.
However, many recommendations can be adopted to reduce the transmission.
Despite all the recommendations mentioned in this review, it is advisable to
formulate and modify the hospital management system according to the hospital’s
infrastructure, budget, available manpower, and area of location. The rate of
hospital-acquired COVID-19 is not only distressing, but it is also posing a big
threat to the healthcare system and healthcare-seeking behavior of mass people.
The scenario will soon be out of hand if appropriate procedures are not practiced.
&amp;nbsp;
Authors&#039; contributions
ABM and SKM: Wrote
the original draft. AA: Idea of the review and supervision, MMH: Edited and
finalized the manuscript.
&amp;nbsp;
Conflicts of interest/Competing interests
All the authors state
that there is no conflict of interest.
&amp;nbsp;
Funding: Nil
&amp;nbsp;
References
1.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; COVID-19 Map. Johns Hopkins Coronavirus
Resource Center. Available at: https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html (accessed on 30
April, 2022).
2.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Marago I, Minen I. Hospital-Acquired
COVID-19 Infection – The magnitude of the problem. SSRN Electron J. 2020. doi: org/10.2139/ssrn.3622387.
3.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Zhou Q, Gao Y,
Wang X, Liu R, Du P, Wang X, et al. Nosocomial infections among patients with
COVID-19, SARS and MERS: a rapid review and meta-analysis. Ann Transl Med. 2020; 8(10):
1-14.
4.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Rickman HM,
Rampling T, Shaw K, Martinez-Garcia G, Hail L, Coen P, et al. Nosocomial
transmission of coronavirus disease 2019: a retrospective study of 66
hospital-acquired cases in a London teaching hospital. Clin Infect Dis. 2021; 72(4):
690-693.
5.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Carter B, Collins
JT, Barlow-Pay F, Rickard F, Bruce E, Verduri A, et al. Nosocomial COVID-19
infection: examining the risk of mortality. The COPE-Nosocomial Study (COVID in
Older People). J Hosp Infect. 2020; 106(2):
376-384.
6.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Barranco R,
Vallega BDTL, Ventura F. Hospital-acquired SARS-Cov-2 infections in patients:
inevitable conditions or medical malpractice?. Int J Environ Res
Public Health. 2021; 18(2): 489-498.
7.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Lai TH, Tang EW,
Chau SK, Fung KS, Li KK. Stepping up infection control measures in
ophthalmology during the novel coronavirus outbreak: an experience from Hong
Kong. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020; 258(5):
1049-1055.
8.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Huang Z, Zhao S,
Li Z, Chen W, Zhao L, Deng L, et al. The battle against coronavirus disease
2019 (COVID-19): emergency management and infection control in a radiology
department. J Am Coll Radiol. 2020; 17(6):
710-716.
9.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Huang L, Lin G,
Tang L, Yu L, Zhou Z. Special attention to nurses’ protection during the
COVID-19 epidemic. Crit Care. 2020; 24(1):
1-3.
10.&amp;nbsp; Cheng LT, Chan LP,
Tan BH, Chen RC, Tay KH, Ling ML, et al. How the severe acute respiratory
syndrome experience influenced a Singapore radiology department&#039;s response to
the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic. Am J
Roentgenol. 2020; 214(6): 1206-1210.
11.&amp;nbsp; Dexter F, Parra MC,
Brown JR, Loftus RW. Perioperative COVID-19 defense: an evidence-based approach
for optimization of infection control and operating room management. Anesth Analg. 2020; 131(1): 37–42. 
12.&amp;nbsp; Wei W, Zheng D, Lei
Y, Wu S, Verma V, Liu Y, et al. Radiotherapy workflow and protection procedures
during the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak: Experience of the
Hubei Cancer Hospital in Wuhan, China. Radiother Oncol. 2020; 148: 203-210.
13.&amp;nbsp; Chen W, Huang Y. To
protect health care workers better, to save more lives with COVID-19. Anesth Analg. 2020; 131(1): 97–101. 
14.&amp;nbsp; Wong J, Goh QY, Tan
Z, Lie SA, Tay YC, Ng SY, et al. Preparing for a COVID-19 pandemic: a review of
operating room outbreak response measures in a large tertiary hospital in
Singapore. Can J Anesth. 2020; 67(6): 732-745.
15.&amp;nbsp; Bourouiba L.
Turbulent gas clouds and respiratory pathogen emissions: potential implications
for reducing transmission of COVID-19. J Am Med Assoc. 2020; 323(18): 1837-1838.
16.&amp;nbsp; Phua J, Weng L,
Ling L, Egi M, Lim CM, Divatia JV, et al. Intensive care management of
coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): challenges and recommendations. Lancet Respir Med. 2020; 8(5):
506-517.
17.&amp;nbsp; Odor PM, Neun M,
Bampoe S, Clark S, Heaton D, Hoogenboom EM, et al. Anaesthesia and COVID-19:
infection control. Br J Anaesth. 2020; 125(1):
16-24.
18.&amp;nbsp; Cheung JC, Ho LT,
Cheng JV, Cham EY, Lam KN. Staff safety during emergency airway management for
COVID-19 in Hong Kong. Lancet Respir Med. 2020; 8(4): e19.
19.&amp;nbsp; Coccolini F,
Perrone G, Chiarugi M, Di Marzo F, Ansaloni L, Scandroglio I, et al. Surgery in
COVID-19 patients: operational directives. World J
Emerg Surg. 2020; 15(1): 1-7. 
20.&amp;nbsp; Alhazzani W, Møller MH, Arabi YM, Loeb M, Gong
MN, Fan E, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Guidelines on the Management of
Critically Ill Adults with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Crit Care Med. 2020; 46(5): 854-887.
21.&amp;nbsp; Welt FG, Shah PB,
Aronow HD, Bortnick AE, Henry TD, Sherwood MW, et al. Catheterization
laboratory considerations during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic: from the
ACC’s Interventional Council and SCAI. J Am
Coll Cardiol. 2020; 75(18): 2372-2375.
22.&amp;nbsp; Al‐Shamsi
HO, Alhazzani W, Alhuraiji A, Coomes EA, Chemaly RF, Almuhanna M, et al. A
practical approach to the management of cancer patients during the novel
coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic: an international collaborative
group. Oncologist. 2020; 25(6): e936-945.
23.&amp;nbsp; Bartlett DL, Howe
JR, Chang G, Crago A, Hogg M, Karakousis G, et al. Management of cancer surgery
cases during the COVID-19 pandemic: considerations. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020; 27(6):
1717-1720.
24.&amp;nbsp; Bornstein SR,
Rubino F, Khunti K, Mingrone G, Hopkins D, Birkenfeld AL, et al. Practical
recommendations for the management of diabetes in patients with COVID-19. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020; 8(6): 546-550.
25.&amp;nbsp; Cao D, Yin H, Chen
J, Tang F, Peng M, Li R, et al. Clinical analysis of ten pregnant women with
COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: A retrospective study. Int J Infect Dis. 2020; 95:
294-300.
26.&amp;nbsp; Liang H, Acharya G. Novel corona virus disease
(COVID-19) in pregnancy: What clinical recommendations to follow? Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020; 99: 439–442. 
27.&amp;nbsp; Tan SS, Yan B, Saw
S, Lee CK, Chong AT, Jureen R, et al. Practical laboratory considerations
amidst the COVID-19 outbreak: early experience from Singapore. J Clin Pathol. 2021; 74(4): 257-260.
28.&amp;nbsp; Wang J, Shen J, Ye
D, Yan X, Zhang Y, Yang W, et al. Disinfection technology of hospital wastes
and waste water: Suggestions for disinfection strategy during coronavirus
Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in China. Environ Pollut. 2020; 262:
114665.
29.&amp;nbsp; Ong SW, Tan YK,
Chia PY, Lee TH, Ng OT, Wong MS, et al. Air, surface environmental, and
personal protective equipment contamination by severe acute respiratory
syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) from a symptomatic patient. J Am Med Assoc. 2020; 323(16): 1610-1612.
&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Cite this article as:
Aftab IB, Ahmed A, Mumu SK, Hossain MM. Management and prevention
of hospital acquired SARS-CoV-2 infection. IMC
J Med Sci. 2022; 16(2): 006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55010/imcjms.16.016</description>

            </item>
            
    <copyright>2026 Ibrahim Medical College. All rights reserved.</copyright>
</channel>
</rss>
