<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://imcjms.com/public/assets/rss.css" ?><rss version="2.0">
<channel>
    <title>IMC Journal of Medical Science</title>
    <link>https://imcjms.com/public</link>
    <description>Ibrahim Medical College Journal of Medical Science</description>

                        <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Vitamin
D status of healthy coastal fishermen of Bangladesh]]></title>

                                    <author><![CDATA[Wasim Md Mohosin Ul Haque]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Md. Faruque Pathan]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[MA Sayeed]]></author>
                
                <link data-url="https://imcjms.com/public/registration/journal_full_text/329">
    https://imcjms.com/public/registration/journal_full_text/329
</link>
                <pubDate>Fri, 20 Sep 2019 22:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
                <category><![CDATA[Original Article]]></category>
                <comments><![CDATA[IMC J Med Sci 2019; 13(2): 006]]></comments>
                <description>Abstract
Background and objectives: Vitamin
D deficiency is now a global concern. Industrialization, urbanization and the
decreasing participation in outdoor activities, with consequent sunlight
deprivation, are thought to be the key factors in the increasing prevalence of
vitamin D deficiency among general population of many countries. It is presumed
that healthy, adequately sun-exposed people should maintain adequate vitamin D
levels. However, studies within this population are scarce. Hence, this study
was conducted to find out the actual vitamin D status in healthy, adequately
sun-exposed population living in coastal district of Bangladesh.
Material and Methods: One hundred and
forty healthy fishermen living in costal district of Cox’s Bazar (210
25&#039; North, 910 59&#039; East) of Bangladesh were enrolled in this study.
Relevant data and blood samples were collected during August 2018, one of the
months with lower zenith angle and higher UV index. Chemiluminescent
micro-particle immunoassay (CMIA) was used to measure 25-hydroxy vitamin D3.
Other relevant biochemical parameters measured were random blood glucose (RBG),
serum creatinine, albumin, calcium, phosphate, alkaline phosphatase and intact
parathyroid hormone (iPTH).
Results: Mean vitamin D level of the study
population was 27.04±7.20 ng/ml. Based on the cut off value of Endocrine
Society, 70.7% of the study population had low vitamin D levels of which 26
(18.6%) and 73 (52.1%) were in vitamin D deficient (&amp;lt;20ng/ml) and
insufficient (20 – 29.99 ng/ml) categories respectively. Vitamin D level was
normal in 41 (29.3%) subjects. There was no significant difference in iPTH
level between groups with low and normal vitamin D levels (p&amp;gt;.05, 95%CI= -5.68226,
1.21086).
Conclusion: The unexpectedly high prevalence of
vitamin D deficiency in this healthy and adequately sun-exposed population raises
the question regarding the validity of the current cutoff value being used to assess
the vitamin D status of Bangladeshi population. Future studies should be
carried out to determine nation-specific, local cutoff values for vitamin D
sufficiency.
IMC J Med
Sci 2019; 13(2): 006. EPub date: 21 September 2019.&amp;nbsp;DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/imcjms.v13i2.45279  
Address for Correspondence: Dr. Wasim Md Mohosin Ul Haque,
Associate Professor, Department of Nephrology, Bangladesh Institute of Research
and Rehabilitation in Diabetes, Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders, 122 Kazi
Nazrul Islam Avenue, Shahbag, Dhaka, Bangladesh; Email: wmmhaque@live.com
&amp;nbsp;
Introduction
Human skin using sunlight produces vitamin D3, the
cholecalciferol, which is further converted to 25-hydroxy vitamin D3 in the
liver. This 25-hydroxy vitamin D3 is further converted in the kidneys to its active
form 1, 25-dihydroxy vitamin D3 which is responsible for most of the biological
effects of vitamin D [1]. We measure
serum 25-hydroxy vitamin D3 to assess vitamin D status. Vitamin D is not merely
a vitamin but also a hormone [2], and
participates in a diverse pool of physiological activities. Thus, its
deficiency can lead to numerous diseases and disabilities. Significance of sun
deprivation and consequent vitamin D deficiency was first recognized in the
early 17th century during the industrial revolution and urbanization
in Europe. The urbanization created congested cities, air pollution due to coal
dust and led to the outbreak of vitamin D deficiency disorders called rickets
in children [3]. In modern days, new
elements of sun deprivation have been added. Children often prefer to remain
indoors rather than going outside and most of the workers work within the
building from dawn to dusk. This change in life style with less outdoor
activity, less sunlight exposure, and consequently less production of ultraviolet-B
(UVB)-induced vitamin D in the skin, ultimately ended with the pandemic of
vitamin D deficiency. About 50% of the people worldwide have vitamin D
insufficiency, and approximately 1 billion people suffer from vitamin D
deficiency [1].
The situation in
Bangladesh is much worse. Several recent studies have reported that about 82%
to 100% of the studied Bangladeshi population have low (insufficient or
deficient) vitamin D levels [4-10]. In
a study conducted within the working population, Mahmood et al found that 100% of the garments workers and 97% of
agricultural/ construction workers had low vitamin D levels [5]. About 82% of postmenopausal women visiting
general physicians had low vitamin D levels [6].
Surprisingly, 95% of the seemingly healthy population and 94.3% of Bangladeshi
adult Muslim females had vitamin D levels lower than normal [8,9]. However, in these studies, health and
sun exposure were not appropriately addressed. It is presumed that healthy
individuals with adequate sun exposure should maintain optimal levels of
vitamin D. However, study within this group of the population is scarce. Hence,
this study was conducted to find out the actual vitamin D status in healthy, adequately
sun-exposed Bangladeshi populations.
&amp;nbsp;
Materials and
Methods
Study population and sample collection:
This was a cross-sectional study. A total of 140 healthy fishermen living in
coastal district of Cox’s Bazar (21025&#039; North, 91059&#039;
East) were enrolled in the study. Cox’s Bazar is a district of Bangladesh
located about 306 km east of capital Dhaka city along the coast of Bay of
Bengal. Fishermen who had at least 30 minutes of sun exposure between 11 am and
2 pm, three times a week for previous 6 months were enrolled. They were exposed
to sunlight for an average of 6 to 8 hours spanning the recommended hours every
day. The age range of the participants was between 19 to 65 years. Each
participant was interviewed which included socio-demographic information, age,
sex, family income, and education, as well as clinical history of present and
past illness, medication. Individuals with chronic diseases, taking vitamin D,
calcium or anti-epileptic drugs and those who refused to participate in the
study were excluded. Anthropometric measures included height and weight and the
body mass index (BMI) was calculated (weight in kg / height in meter2).
Blood samples were collected aseptically after counseling and thorough clinical
evaluation. Informed written consent was obtained from each participant prior
to collection of blood sample. Specimens were preserved at -600C until
analyzed.
&amp;nbsp;
Biochemical tests:
Chemiluminescent micro-particle immunoassay (CMIA) was used to estimate
25-hydroxy vitamin D to measure the serum vitamin D level [11]. Vitamin D level was categorized into
deficient, insufficient and adequate according to the Endocrine Society
guideline [12]. Random blood glucose,
serum creatinine, albumin, calcium, phosphate, alkaline phosphatase and iPTH
were also estimated. Serum vitamin D level of our study population was compared
with the reported vitamin D levels of other studies conducted previously on
different Bangladeshi population. 
IBM SPSS version 25 with python plug-in software was used to
analyze the data.
&amp;nbsp;
Results
Mean age and body mass index (BMI) of the study population were
38.1±11.6 years (CI=35.3, 39.3) and 22.4±3.2kg/m² (CI=22.2, 23.7) respectively.
Eight subjects were obese (BMI≥30kg/m²) based on WHO criteria. Table - 1 shows
the relevant biochemical parameters of the study population. The parameters were
within normal range in all the participants except in 2 participants who had
random blood glucose (RBG) more than 11.1 mmol/L and 7 had alkaline phosphatase
levels higher than the upper normal limit. Mean serum vitamin D level of the
study population was 27.04±7.2 ng/ml (95% CI=25.84, 28.25). Based on Endocrine
Society guideline [12], 99 (70.70%) participants had low
vitamin D levels (Table-2). Mean vitamin D level of all our participants was
significantly higher than the reported levels in other studies conducted
previously on Bangladeshi population (Table-3). There was no significant
difference in iPTH level, the surrogate marker of vitamin D deficiency, between
groups with low and normal vitamin D levels (p&amp;gt;.05, 95%CI=-5.68226, 1.21086;
Table-4).
&amp;nbsp;
Table-1:
Biochemical parameters of the study
population
&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Table-2:
Serum vitamin D status of the study
population based on Endocrine Society guideline [12]

&amp;nbsp;
Table-3: Serum vitamin D levels of Bangladeshi
population reported in previous studies compared to current study

&amp;nbsp;Table-4:
Relevant serum biochemical markers
related to vitamin D deficiency in population with low and normal vitamin D
levels
&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Discussion
Higher mean vitamin D level (27.04±7.21 ng/ml) found among the fishermen
living in coastal areas compared to levels reported in other categories of
people by previous Bangladeshi studies signifies the importance of sun exposure
to maintain adequate concentration of serum vitamin D. In a similar study, Lee et al found that healthy fishermen who
lived in a coastal city in South Korea had 1.7 times higher mean serum
concentration of 25(OH)D compared to the general occupation group
(23.74±8.88ng/mL and 13.60 ± 6.43, p&amp;lt;.001) [13].
Despite having an abundant exposure to the sun, 71% of our study population had
low vitamin D in terms of levels mentioned in the guideline of Endocrine
Society. Similarly, the South Korean study reported low vitamin D levels in 78%
of healthy coastal fishermen despite adequate sun exposure [13]. In India, 84.9% of the healthy adult
population of the coastal regions of Odisha had low vitamin D levels [14]. However, healthy individuals with
reasonable sun exposure residing in an area between 350N and 350S
should not have vitamin D deficiency, because this region has enough sun
strength to maintain adequate vitamin D levels [15].
All the studies mentioned including the current one were carried out in highly
sun exposed zone. It is an established fact that only 5 to 10 minutes of sun
exposure can produce 3000 IU of cholecalciferol that is sufficient to satisfy
vitamin D requirement [16]. Study in
India found that 30 minutes of sun exposure between 11 am and 2 pm, three times
a week was enough to maintain adequate serum vitamin D concentration [17]. So, this high prevalence of low serum D
in our study population is quite unexpected. Moreover, Vitamin D deficiency is
usually associated with a raised iPTH level which is a surrogate marker of
vitamin D deficiency. In our study, no significant difference was found between
the serum iPTH levels of low and normal vitamin D groups.
&amp;nbsp;
Acknowledgement
We are thankful to Prof. J. Ashraful Haq, Department of
Microbiology, Ibrahim Medical College for his help in editing the manuscript.
&amp;nbsp;
Conflict of
interest: None
&amp;nbsp;
References
1.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Nair R, Maseeh A. Vitamin D: the
&quot;sunshine&quot; vitamin. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2012; 3(2):
118-126.
2.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Reichrath J, Lehmann B, Carlberg C, Varani
J, Zouboulis CJH, Research M. Vitamins as hormones. Horm Metab Res. 2007; 39(02):
71-84.
3.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Wacker M, Holick MF. Sunlight and Vitamin
D: a global perspective for health. Dermatoendocrinol.
2013; 5(1): 51-108.
4.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Islam MZ, Shamim AA, Kemi V, Nevanlinna A,
Akhtaruzzaman M, Laaksonen M, et al.
Vitamin D deficiency and low bone status in adult female garment factory
workers in Bangladesh. Br J Nutr.
2008; 99(6): 1322-1329.
5.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Mahmood S, Rahman M, Biswas SK, Saqueeb SN,
Zaman S, Manirujjaman M, et al.
Vitamin D and parathyroid hormone status in female garment workers: a
case-control study in Bangladesh. Biomed
Res Int. 2017; 2017: 4105375.
6.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Ahmed AS, Haque WMMU, Uddin KN, Abrar F,
Afroz FA, Huque HF, et al. Vitamin D
and bone mineral density status among postmenopausal Bangladeshi women. IMC J Med Sci. 2018; 12(2): 44-49.
7.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Hossain HT, Islam QT, Khandaker MAK, Ahasan
HAMN. Study of serum vitamin D level in different socio-demographic
population-a pilot study. J Medicine.
2018; 19(1): 22-29.
8.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Acherjya GK, Ali M, Tarafder K, Akhter N,
Chowdhury MK, Islam DU, et al. Study
of vitamin D deficiency among the apparently healthy population in Jashore,
Bangladesh. Mymensingh Med J. 2019; 28(1): 214-221.
9.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Shefin SM, Qureshi NK, Nessa A, Latif
ZAJBMJ. Vitamin D status among Bangladeshi adult muslim females having diabetes
and using hijab. BIRDEM Med J. 2018; 8(3): 203-209.
10.&amp;nbsp; Khan AU, Hossain MA, Rahman MA, Rahman HW,
Reza MA, Khan MK, et al. Estimation
of vitamin D levels among physicians working in a tertiary Level hospital of
Bangladesh. Mymensingh Med J. 2019; 28(2): 322-327.
11.&amp;nbsp; Hutchinson K, Healy M, Crowley V, Louw M,
Rochev Y. Verification of Abbott 25-OH-vitamin D assay on the Architect system.
Pract Lab Med. 2017; 7: 27-35.
12.&amp;nbsp; Holick MF, Binkley NC, Bischoff-Ferrari HA,
Gordon CM, Hanley DA, Heaney RP, et al.
Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: an Endocrine
Society clinical practice guideline. J
Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011; 96(7):
1911-1930.
13.&amp;nbsp; Lee DH, Park KS, Cho MC. Laboratory
confirmation of the effect of occupational sun exposure on
serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration. Medicine
(Baltimore). 2018; 97(27):
e11419.
14.&amp;nbsp; Rattan R, Sahoo D, Mahapatra S. Prevalence of
vitamin D deficiency in adults in the coastal regions of Odisha, India. J Pharm Biol Sci. 2016; 11(6): 49-52.
15.&amp;nbsp; Holick MF. Vitamin D: importance in the
prevention of cancers, type 1 diabetes, heart disease, and osteoporosis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004; 79(3): 362-371.
16.&amp;nbsp; Holick MF. Vitamin D deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357(3): 266-281.
17.&amp;nbsp; Harinarayan CV, Holick MF, Prasad UV, Vani PS,
Himabindu G. Vitamin D status and sun exposure in India. Dermatoendocrinol. 2013; 5(1):
130-141.</description>

            </item>
            
    <copyright>2026 Ibrahim Medical College. All rights reserved.</copyright>
</channel>
</rss>
