<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://imcjms.com/public/assets/rss.css" ?><rss version="2.0">
<channel>
    <title>IMC Journal of Medical Science</title>
    <link>https://imcjms.com/public</link>
    <description>Ibrahim Medical College Journal of Medical Science</description>

                        <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Management of non-absorbable mesh infection after hernia repair by negative pressure wound therapy]]></title>

                                    <author><![CDATA[Amreen Faruq]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[HM Sabbir Raihan]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Muhtarima Haque]]></author>
                
                <link data-url="https://imcjms.com/public/registration/journal_full_text/324">
    https://imcjms.com/public/registration/journal_full_text/324
</link>
                <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2019 12:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
                <category><![CDATA[Original Article]]></category>
                <comments><![CDATA[IMC J Med Sci 2019; 13(1): 008]]></comments>
                <description>Abstract
Background
and objectives: Mesh infection
following hernia repair has previously often resulted in removal of mesh. The
aim of this study was to evaluate if negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) can
be used to treat such complications and preserve the mesh.
Materials
and method:
A prospective study was carried in the Department of Surgery, BIRDEM General
Hospital from January 2017 to January 2019. Patients with deep wound infection
and exposed infected mesh after hernioplasty were included in the study. Patients’
demographics, existing comorbidities and outcome were recorded. All patients
were treated with NPWT till the wound was covered with healthy granulation
tissue and closed.
Results: NPWT was used to treat
7 patients with mesh infection following hernia repair. There was 2 male and 5
female cases and age ranged from 38-58 years. With NPWT the mesh in 6 patients
(86%) out of 7 could be completely salvaged and wound closed with secondary
suturing. However, in 1 patient although the mesh covered with granulation
tissue by NPWT and wound was closed; but it had to be partly removed later on due
to development of chronic discharging sinus 20 days after stitch removal.
Conclusion: The study demonstrated
that NPWT was a useful technique for the treatment and preservation of infected
mesh after hernia repair.
IMC J Med Sci 2019; 13(1): 008. EPub date:
20 June 2019.&amp;nbsp;DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/imcjms.v13i1.42041  
Address for Correspondence: Dr. Amreen Faruq,
Assistant Professor,
Department of Surgery, BIRDEM General Hospital, 122 Kazi Nazrul Islam Avenue,
Shahbag, Dhaka 1000. E-mail: dramreen78@yahoo.com
&amp;nbsp;
Introduction
The use
of prosthetic mesh in the repair of abdominal wall hernias that occur either due
to open or laparoscopic surgery is the gold standard treatment. Mesh repair
significantly reduces hernia recurrence by 30 % [1-3]. However, as with any
prosthetic implant the mesh is susceptible to infection. The reported incidence
of mesh infection following hernia repair varies from 1% to as high as 7-8% [4-8].
The rate of mesh infection following hernia repair in our hospital is not
available. The exact incidence may be difficult to find probably due to its
variable presentation with symptoms starting in early postoperative period to
several years after surgery. Mesh infection is a misery for the patient as it is
associated with longer hospital stay, added expenditure and emotional trauma.
The recommended treatment for mesh infection involving non absorbable mesh is
early surgical removal of the mesh and wound care [4-10]. However, this may
leave behind a more complex open wound with an abdominal wall weakness, resulting
in a recurrent hernia.
Negative
pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is a newer technique used in the management of
wound infection. This therapy enhances wound healing by (a) removing excess
exudates, (b) providing a controlled moist environment, and (c) promoting
neovascularization and granulation tissue formation. Moreover, it also
stimulates shrinking of the wound size [11-13]. Taking into account of these
properties, the present study was undertaken to evaluate the NPWT in the
salvation/management of infected mesh of hernioplasty cases.
&amp;nbsp;
Materials and Methods
This
prospective study was carried out in the department of Surgery, BIRDEM General
Hospital from January 2017 to January 2019. Patients included in the study were
informed of the treatment options and informed written consent was obtained. 
Study
population:
All patients diagnosed with deep wound and mesh infection/exposure following
hernia repair (incisional, inguinal, umbilical, paraumbilical) were included in
the study. Minor superficial surgical site infection following mesh repair were
excluded.
Mesh
infection was defined as presence of local signs of wound infection namely
purulent discharge /pus or abscess formation at the level of mesh with positive
microbiological culture results. Superficial surgical site infection was
defined as infection that occurred within 30 days of surgery involving skin and
subcutaneous tissue of incision while deep surgical site infection was defined as
infection involving deep soft tissue (fascia, muscle) [14]. 
Information regarding age, body mass
index (BMI)), presence of comorbidities , site of hernia wound and size, type
of mesh used for the repair of hernia and number of days when infection
occurred after hernioplasty operation were recorded in a pre-designed data
sheet.
Negative
pressure wound therapy (NPWT): After obtaining consent,
negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) was employed for the management/ salvation
of the infected mesh. 
NPWT procedure involved
controlled application of sub-atmospheric pressure to a local environment using
a sealed wound dressing connected to a vacuum pump [15]. Initially the wound
size was measured and surgical debridement of the wound was done under general
or spinal anesthesia. Then, wound size was again measured after debridement and
NPWT applied. A sterile black sponge was cut into specific size according to
shape, size and depth of the prepared wound. A tube with multiple perforations
at one end was placed within the sponge ensuring that the end with perforations
remained inside the sponge and the rest taken out through the sponge.&amp;nbsp;The
sponge was soaked in 10% povidone iodine solution and wrapped with Sofratulle
(medicated Vaseline gauge) to prevent adherence of the sponge to the wound. The
sponge was then placed on the wound just above the mesh; ensuring that the mesh
was in firm contact with the underlying wound surface.&amp;nbsp;A transparent
occlusive and adhesive dressing was applied over the sponge and the tube
brought out through it making sure that the dressing was airtight (Fig 1a, b,
c, d). The drainage tube was connected to commercially available portable
suction machine or wall mounted suction devices.
&amp;nbsp;
Fig-1a.
Wound infection after hernioplasty (mesh
repair) in an incisional hernia (arrow); 1b:
Wound showing exposed mesh after debridement; 1c: NPWT dressing- Black sponge wrapped in Sofratulle being placed
in wound; 1d: Airtight occlusive dressing on abdominal wound.
&amp;nbsp;
The negative pressure
was set to-100 to- 120 mm Hg during the entire NPWT&amp;nbsp;treatment.&amp;nbsp;Suction
was automated at 10 minutes interval. Initially the NPWT dressing was&amp;nbsp;opened
every third day and a new dressing given, this was done for first 2 sessions
then dressing changed every 5th day or once a week depending on the
wound condition. The dressing was continued till the wound and mesh was covered
with healthy granulation tissue (Fig 2a and 2b). The wound was irrigated with
normal saline mixed with 10% povidone iodine (3:1) once daily through the tube.
Systemic antibiotics were used according to the results of culture and
sensitivity.
&amp;nbsp;
Fig-2a.
Granulation tissue formation after two
sessions of NPWT; 2b: Wound and exposed mesh covered with granulation tissue.
&amp;nbsp;
The
NPWT was continued till the mesh was covered with granulation tissue. Once the
wound was covered with healthy granulation it was cleaned with normal saline
and wound closure planned. The wounds were closed either by suture or skin
graft depending on the size of the wounds. Healing by secondary intention was
allowed in cases where suture or skin graft was not possible. After wound closure,
the patients were carefully followed up till wound healed and stitches were
removed. Duration of NPWT and length of total
hospital stay were also recorded. Sample of wound swab was taken from each case for culture
and sensitivity test.
There was
a follow up plan for 3 years for each patient from the time of wound closure to
observe any delayed wound infection, fistula or hernia recurrence.
&amp;nbsp;
Results
A total
of 7 patients were included in this study. Out of 7 cases, 4 were patients
primarily operated at BIRDEM General Hospital and 3 were referred from
different hospitals after developing wound infection following hernioplasty
operation. Among the study patients, 71% (5/7) were female and 29% (2/7) were
male. The mean age and BMI of the study patient were 47.85±6.84 years and 30.02
± 4.97 kg/m2 respectively. About 57% of study patients presented with
incisional hernia. Incisional hernia was present mostly
in older patients (&amp;gt;50 years) and paraumbilical hernia was present in
relatively younger patients (&amp;lt;45 years).
Polypropylene
mesh was used in majority of the patients (5/7, 71%; Table-1). The mean
postoperative day of diagnosis of wound infection was 7.71 ±2.56 days (range
4-11 days). Male patients developed infection earlier (&amp;lt; 6 post
operative day) than female patients.
&amp;nbsp;
Table-1: Types of hernia and mesh used in study population
&amp;nbsp;
Table-2 describes the co-morbidities of the study
patients. All the patients were diabetic. Hypertension, chronic kidney disease,
bronchial asthma and hypothyroidism were present in 57.1%, 42.9%, 29% and 14%
of the study patients respectively. Out 7 cases, 6 had multiple or more than
one comorbidity.
&amp;nbsp;
Table-2: Details of co-morbidities present in all patients
&amp;nbsp;
Table-3 shows the pattern of bacteria isolated from the
7 cases prior to instituting NPWT. Pseudomonas
sp was present in 42% patients either individually or in combination with
other bacteria such as Esch. coli or Klebsiella sp. Out of 7 cases, 4 had wound
infection with single bacteria while 3 had multiple organisms.
&amp;nbsp;
Table-3: Pattern of organisms isolated from wound samples of study cases (n=7)
&amp;nbsp;
Table-4
shows the size of the wound of the individual case before and after completion
of NWPT. Wound size was measured after first debridement and
after 3 sessions of NPWT in all patients and finally before closure. There was
22-24 % reduction in wound size after completion of NPWT in all 7 patients.
&amp;nbsp;
</description>

            </item>
            
    <copyright>2026 Ibrahim Medical College. All rights reserved.</copyright>
</channel>
</rss>
