<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://imcjms.com/public/assets/rss.css" ?><rss version="2.0">
<channel>
    <title>IMC Journal of Medical Science</title>
    <link>https://imcjms.com/public</link>
    <description>Ibrahim Medical College Journal of Medical Science</description>

                        <item>
                <title><![CDATA[CLINICAL PROFILE OF DIABETES MELLITUS IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS UNDER EIGHTEEN YEARS OF AGE]]></title>

                                    <author><![CDATA[Fauzia Mohsin]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Bedowra Zabeen]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Rahelee Zinnat]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Kishwar Azad]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Nazmun Nahar ]]></author>
                
                <link data-url="https://imcjms.com/public/registration/journal_full_text/3">
    https://imcjms.com/public/registration/journal_full_text/3
</link>
                <pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2016 08:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
                <category><![CDATA[Original Article]]></category>
                <comments><![CDATA[Ibrahim Med. Coll. J. 2007; 1(1): 11-15]]></comments>
                <description>A total number of 125 patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) under eighteen
years of age were admitted in the Paediartic department of BIRDEM hospital
between January 2001 to October 2002. Eighty-eight patients (71%) were newly
detected. Female to male ratio was 3:1. Out of the total admission 38 (30.4%)
patients had type 1 DM (group 1), 37 (29.6%) patients had fibrocalculous
pancreatic FCPD diabetes (group II), 48 (38.4%) patient had malnutrition
modulated diabetes mellitus MMDM (group III) and 2 (1.6%) patients had type 2.
Mean age of onset was 9±3.9 yrs in group I and 13±2.3 yrs in group II and group
III. All groups had very high glucose and HbA1c value at presentation. The mean fasting glucose (mmol/l) was
19±7.14, 22.39±9 and 19.54±7.9 in group I, group II and group III respectively.
The Mean HbA1c (%) value in
the three groups was 14.4±2.7, 16.72±2.26 and 15.27±3.05 respectively. FCPD
patients had poorest glycaemic status. Acute complications were more common in
type 1 patients. Twelve (31.5%) patients had diabetic ketoatin DKA and two (5%)
patients had hypoglycaemia in group I. Chronic complications were present in
all three groups.&amp;nbsp; MMDM patients had
highest rate of complications. which was present in 2.6%, 21.6% and 33.3%
patients in group I, group II and group III respectively. The rate of
microalbuminuria was 5.3%. 10.8% and 18.8% in the three groups respectively.
The rate of neuropathy was 2.6%, 16.2% and 20.8% in the three groups
respectively. Among the associated problems skin infection, pulmonary
tuberculosis and bilateral parotid swelling were common. Malnutrition was
present in 66%, 86% and 100% in group I, group II and group III respectively.
Majority (50% in group I, 91.6% in group II and 100% in group III) of our
patients came from poor socio-economic background. 
Ibrahim Med.
Coll. J. 2007; 1(1): 11-15
Introduction
Bangladesh
Institute of Research and Rehabilitation on Diabetes, Endocrine and Metabolic
disorders (BIRDEM) is an internationally reputed tertiary level hospital for
care of diabetic patients. By the end of 2003, the number of registered diabetic
patients in BIRDEM was 320,000. The proportion of diabetics under eighteen
years of age was found to be 1.58% among the registered cases of BIRDEM. It is
expected that the under eighteen registered diabetic patients in BIRDEM
represent the population of childhood and adolescent diabetics of Bangladesh.
The present study was undertaken to examine the clinical profile of DM in
children and adolescents in the Department of Paediatrics, BIRDEM.
Patients and Methods
1.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Type 1 DM (group I): Patients
with early onset and/or with typical sign/symptoms of diabetes for a short
duration were classified as type 1 diabetics. Patients presenting with diabetic
ketoacidosis (DKA) were also included in this group.
3.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; MMDM (group III):
Patients with lean body mass (BMI less than 5th&amp;nbsp;centile for age), other
evidence of malnutrition and no pancreatic calcification. They had
signs/symptoms of diabetes for prolonged period but absence of ketosis.
Microalbuminuria
was defined as albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR): 30-300mg/gm in spot urine.
All the
data were expressed as mean±standard deviation, median (range) and/or number
(%) as appropriate. Statistical analysis was done by using SPSS for windows
package. Appropriate statistical test of significance like unpaired t test was
used as necessary. P&amp;lt;0.05 was taken as minimal level of significance.
Correlation study was done by Pearson correlation.
Results
All patients in group II and group III had typical
symptoms of diabetes at diagnosis. In addition, 32% of FCPD patients had
history of recurrent abdominal pain. One patient in group I had nocturnal
enuresis as the only presenting symptom. Seven (24%) of type 1 diabetic
patients developed DKA at first presentation, six of them had typical symptoms
of DM for a short period (few days to few weeks) before developing DKA, but one
patient presented with DKA only without preceding symptoms of diabetes. A
substantial number of patients presented themselves with chronic complications such
as cataract, microalbuminuria and neuropathy at diagnosis. Out of 25 cases of
cataract, 16 (64%) cases were newly detected. Ten (66%) out of fifteen patients
with microalbuminuria and 12 (70%) out of seventeen patients with neuropathy
were newly detected. 
Among
the newly detected patients mean(±SD) duration (months) of&amp;nbsp; typical symptoms of DM prior to diagnosis was
2.0 ±2.9, 6.3 ± 9.6 and 13 ±12&amp;nbsp; in group
I, group II and group III respectively. There was significant difference in
duration of symptoms among the three groups (p=0.02 in group I vs. group II;
p&amp;lt;0.0001in group I vs. group III; p=0.03 in group II vs. group III). MMDM
group had longest duration of typical symptoms of diabetes.
&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Glyacemic control
  
  
  Group II
  
  
  Fasting blood glucose (mmol/l)
  
  
  22.39±9
  
  
  Blood glucose 2 hour after breakfast ( mmol/l)
  
  
  31.07±7.1
  
  
  HbA1c (%)
  
  
  16.72±2.26
  
  
  &amp;nbsp;
Acute
complications were more common in type 1 patients. In group I, twelve (31.5%)
patients had DKA and 2 (5%) patients had hypoglycaemia. The first presentation
was with DKA in seven (24%) type 1 diabetic patients. Only one (2.7%) FCPD
patient had DKA along with septicaemia.
&amp;nbsp;
No significant correlation was found between any of the
complication and duration of diabetes, duration of symptom, glycaemic status, age
of onset or age on admission. There were some associated problems as shown in
table 2.
Table 2.
Distribution of associated problems as among the three groups 

 
  
  Group
  
  
  Group III
  
 
 
  
  1 (2.6%)
  
  
  7 (14.6)
  
 
 
  
  19(2.6%)
  
  
  5 (10.4%)
  
 
 
  
  0
  
  
  12 (25%)
  
 

Family history of diabetes was present in
eight (22.2%) type 1, one (2.6%) FCPD and three (8.1%) MMDM patients.
Majority (50% in group I, 91.6% in group II and 100% in group III)
of our patients came from poor socio-economic background.
During
the study period 2 patients died. One patient with type 1 DM died of DKA. One
patient with FCPD died of septicaemia and pneumonia. She developed DKA before
death.
Discussion
There
was a female preponderance, consistent with our previous studies in BIRDEM8. Patients in FCPD and MMDM groups were mostly adolescents (mean
age 13±2.3 years). In the majority of FCPD patients diagnosis is made between
the ages of 20 and 40 years of age but onset in childhood, in infancy and at
older age groups are not uncommon9-11. Onset of MMDM
is commonly between 10 to 30 years but onset at preschool age and over the age
of 30 years can also occur7. There is said to be a bimodal distribution
for type 1 diabetics, with a minor peak at 4 to 6 years and a major peak at 10
to 14 years. In our study population, the mean age onset of type 1 diabetics
was 9±3.9 years.
The very
high blood glucose and HbA1c in the three
groups is not unexpected, as most of these are values at first presentation of
diabetes. Glycaemic control was worst in FCPD patients.
A
striking feature of our study population was the presence of microvascular
complications (microalbuminuria and neuropathy) even at presentation and a very
high rate of complication in the MMDM group. Possible explanation is that they
may have very slow onset diabetes or have remained undiagnosed for a long time.
This is possible because despite having severe hyperglycaemia they are ketosis
resistant19.
Positive family history was present in 22.2%, 2.7% and 8.1% Type 1,
FCPD and MMDM patients respectively. Although genetic factor is important for
the development of type 1 diabetes, positive family history is uncommon
(&amp;lt;10%) in MMDM suggesting that the disease is more likely environmental than
genetic 7. Familial aggregation of FCPD patients have
been reported from India and Bangladesh suggesting genetic susceptibility21,22.
&amp;nbsp;
The
overall clinical presentation of our diabetic population is somewhat different
from that of developed and western world. Acute complications such as DKA and
hypoglycaemia are more common in Type 1 patients as found worldwide but the
high rate of complication even at presentation among FCPD and MMDM patients and
their poor nutritional status are of concern.
&amp;nbsp;
1.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Ruwaard D, Hirasing RA,
Reeser HM et al. Increasing incidence of type 1 diabetes in the Netherlands.
The second nationwide study among children under 20 years of age. Diabetes care
1994; 17: 599-601.
3.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; WHO technical report
series 727. Diabetes Mellitus. World Health Organization, Geneva, 1985.
5.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Tripathy BB, Samal KC.
Overview consensus statement on Diabetes in Tropical areas. Diabetes /Metab Rev
1997; 13: 63-7.
7.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Samal KC, Kanungo A,
Sanjeevi CB. Clinicoepidemiological and Biochemichal profile of
Malnutrition-Modulated Diabetes Mellitus. Ann. N.Y. SCI. 2002; 958: 131-137.
9. &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Mohan V, Ramachandran
A,Viswanathan N. Childhood onset fibrocalculous pancreatic diabetes. Int J
Diabetes&amp;nbsp; Dev Countries 1990; 10: 24-26.
11.&amp;nbsp; Mohan V, Suresh S,
Indrani S et al. Fibrocalculous Pancreatic Diabetes in the elderly. J Assoc
Phys Ind 1989; 37: 342-344.
13. Mohan V, SnehalataC,
Ramachandran A et al. Plasma glucagons response in tropical fibrocalculous
pancreatic diabetes. Diabetes res Clin Pract 1990; 9: 97-101.
15. Donaghue KC, Fairchild
JM, Chan A et al. Diabetes complication screening in 937 children and
adolescents. JPEM 1999; 12: 185-92.
17.&amp;nbsp; Ludvigsson J, Johanesson
G, Heding L et al. Sensory nerve conduction velocity and vibratory sensibility
in juvenile diabetics. Relationship to endogenous insulin. Acta Paediatr Scand
1979; 68: 739-48.
19.&amp;nbsp; Hugh-Jones P. Diabetes in
Jamaica. Lancet 1955; 2: 891.
21. Chowdhury ZMd, McDermott
MF, Davey S et al. Genetic susceptibility to fibrocalculous pancreatic diabetes
in&amp;nbsp; Bangladeshi subjects: a family study.
Genes and Immunity 2002; 3: 5-8.
</description>

            </item>
            
    <copyright>2026 Ibrahim Medical College. All rights reserved.</copyright>
</channel>
</rss>
