<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://imcjms.com/public/assets/rss.css" ?><rss version="2.0">
<channel>
    <title>IMC Journal of Medical Science</title>
    <link>https://imcjms.com/public</link>
    <description>Ibrahim Medical College Journal of Medical Science</description>

                        <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Neovaginoplasty using sigmoid colon flap technique]]></title>

                                    <author><![CDATA[Mohammed Rashedul Islam]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Anjan Kumar Deb]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Farzana Bilquis Ibrahim]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Raihan Anwar]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Md Anwarul Islam]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Morshed Uddin Akand]]></author>
                
                <link data-url="https://imcjms.com/public/registration/journal_full_text/237">
    https://imcjms.com/public/registration/journal_full_text/237
</link>
                <pubDate>Tue, 04 Jul 2017 10:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
                <category><![CDATA[Original Article]]></category>
                <comments><![CDATA[IMC J Med Sci 2018; 12(1): 27-31]]></comments>
                <description>Abstract
Background
and objectives:
Vaginoplasty is a procedure for the reconstruction of vaginal canal. Various
surgical techniques have been described for vaginal reconstruction with
variable success. The aim of this study was to assess the use of sigmoid colon
in vaginal reconstruction of patients with disorders of sex development.
Methods: Eleven patients
were included in this study from January 2009 to December 2016. All patients underwent karyotyping,
pelvi-abdominal ultrasonography, endocrine and psychiatric assessment.
Sigmoid neo-vaginoplasty was the procedure chosen for all the cases. Surgical
and functional outcomes were assessed post-operatively over a period of 6 month
to 6 years.
Results: The preoperative
diagnosis included 9 cases of aplasia of the Mullerian ducts or Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser
syndrome (MRKH), 1 androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS) and 1 pseudohermaphrodite
case. The mean age of the study population was 22.5 years (range 15-30 yrs). No
intra-operative or early postoperative complications occurred. The mean vaginal
length achieved was 13.0 cm (range 10.5 – 15 cm). Long term follow-up showed
introital stenosis in 2 cases (17%) which resolved well to vaginal dilatation.
One patient had pelvic abscess and treated by surgery. Sexual satisfaction was
achieved in 10 cases, as 1 case was unmarried. 
Conclusion: For patients with
disorders of sex development of various etiologies, sigmoid vaginoplasty is the
preferred technique for vaginal reconstruction. It is a safe technique and
provides the patient with a cosmetic neovagina of adequate caliber with satisfactory
functional outcome.
IMC J Med Sci 2018; 12(1): 27-31.&amp;nbsp;DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3329/imcjms.v12i1.35175  
Address for Correspondence: Dr. Mohammed Rashedul Islam, Assistant
Professor, Department of Plastic Surgery, BIRDEM General Hospital, Room No. 1119,
122 Kazi Nazrul Islam Avenue, Dhaka – 1000. Email: rashedplastic@gmail.com
&amp;nbsp;
Introduction
Vaginoplasty
is a procedure for the reconstruction of vaginal
canal and the vulva that can be performed in various clinical situations. Though a rare procedure, the
commonest indication is the congenital absence of the vagina, which occurs as a
result of aplasia of the Mullerian ducts (46, XX) or Mayer-Rokitansky -Küster-Hauser
syndrome (MRKH). Second indication is disorders of sex development (DSD). A large
number of medical conditions involving the reproductive system fall under DSD,
which is used as an umbrella term for these anomalies. The most common DSD is
congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) followed
by androgen insensitivity syndrome (AIS, 46, XY) [1]. Genetic sexual
ambiguity and vaginal loss resulting from gynecologic cancer or post traumatic
injury are other two indications for neo-vaginoplasty [2]. The ovaries, given their
separate embryologic source, are normal in structure and function. Reported
incidences of congenital absence of the vagina vary from 1 in 4,000 to 5,000
female births [2,3].
The three basic tenets of vaginoplasty are: (a) creation of space
between urethra and urinary bladder anteriorly anus and rectum posteriorly, (b)
providing this space with a durable lining and (c) maintaining the dimensions
and integrity of the newly created vagina.
The advantages of using a bowel segment in contrast to other methods of
vaginoplasty are: 1) no graft failure or secondary contracture/stenosis because
a vascularized epithelial-lined tube is used,
2) patency and depth can be maintained without a mold and with minimal dilatation,
3) spontaneous mucus production matches that of the normal vagina and facilitates
sexual intercourse, 4) dyspareunia, frequently seen with skin grafts, is avoided
by the ability of the intestinal segment to withstand local trauma, 5) the use of
an intestinal segment offers the option of performing a bowel interposition vaginoplasty
during infancy at the time of surgical correction of more complex associated caudal
anomalies and 6) avoids the disadvantage of sweating, maceration, hair growth
and foul smell associated with skin flaps. The sigmoid colon is the best choice
for interposition vaginoplasty because of size, location, and ease of
preserving blood supply [8]. In this series, we evaluated the use of sigmoid
colon for vaginal replacement among patients with MKRH and DSD.
&amp;nbsp;
Methods
Study
population and baseline investigations: The current study included 11
patients from January 2009 to December 2016. All were reared as females.
Complete hormonal assessment was done. Sigmoid neo-vaginoplasty was the
procedure chosen for all the cases. Surgical and functional outcomes were assessed postoperatively. All
patients were subjected to history taking and physical examination. All
patients underwent karyotyping, pelvi-abdominal ultrasonography, endocrine and
psychiatric assessment. Informed written consent was obtained from all patients
or their guardians. None of the patients underwent mechanical and/or antibiotic
bowel preparation prior to surgery.
</description>

            </item>
            
    <copyright>2026 Ibrahim Medical College. All rights reserved.</copyright>
</channel>
</rss>
