<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://imcjms.com/public/assets/rss.css" ?><rss version="2.0">
<channel>
    <title>IMC Journal of Medical Science</title>
    <link>https://imcjms.com/public</link>
    <description>Ibrahim Medical College Journal of Medical Science</description>

                        <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Growth of very low birth weight infants and its association with feeding regimens]]></title>

                                    <author><![CDATA[Mohammad Faizul Haque Khan]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[MAK Azad Chowdhury]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Md. Mahbubul Hoque]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Mohammed Maruf-ul-Quader]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Mahfuza Shirin]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[M Monir Hossain]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Rumana Aziz]]></author>
                
                <link data-url="https://imcjms.com/public/registration/journal_full_text/213">
    https://imcjms.com/public/registration/journal_full_text/213
</link>
                <pubDate>Sun, 07 May 2017 12:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
                <category><![CDATA[Original Article]]></category>
                <comments><![CDATA[Ibrahim Med. Coll. J. 2011; 5(2): 54-58]]></comments>
                <description>Clinical
care of infants with very low birth weight (weighing&amp;lt;1500 gm at birth) in
developing countries can be labour intensive and is often associated with a
prolonged stay in hospital. Although several studies have shown the benefits of
early discharge from the hospital for premature infants, it is still a common
practice to delay discharge of these infants until they reach a weight of 2000
gm or more. The present study was undertaken to test the assumption that very
low birth weight (VLBW) infants can attain optimum growth at home and to find
its association with feeding regimens. This prospective observational study was
conducted at Neonatal Out-patient Department, Dhaka Shishu&amp;nbsp; Hospital over a period of 1 year from January
2010 to December 2010. A total of 92 very low birth weight neonates were
enrolled during discahrge in the Neonatal Unit of Dhaka Shisu Hospital. Out of
these 92 neonates 16 neonates expired while 7, 4 and 1 neonates dropped out in
the first, second and third follow up respectively. The neonates after
discharge were fed on three types of feeding regimens at home. The feeding
regimens were expressed breast milk (EBM), EBM+ infant formula (mixed feeding)
and infant formula only).The outcome variable was growth in terms of increase
in weight, length and occiputo-frontal circumference (OFC). The other outcome
measures were respiratory tract infection (RTI), diarrhoea and anaemia, visit
to physician and readmission to hospital for the morbidities they encountered.
The neonates were observed up to three consecutive follow-ups from their date
of discharge. The median gestational age at birth was 31 weeks. Approximately
57% of the neonates were admitted within 72 hours of birth with median age at
admission being 24 hours. Females were slightly higher (54.3%) than the males
(45.7%). The mean weight, length and OFC at admission were 1208 gm 39.8 cm and
28.3 cm respectively. The study demonstrated a steady increase of weight,
length and OFC of the infants up to a median age of 6 months with mixed&amp;nbsp; and EBM feeding compared to infant formula
group. Regarding RTI, diarhoea and anaemia&amp;nbsp;
the breast fed group suffered less frequently than the groups fed with
infant formula and EBM+infant formula groups. The frequency of visits to
physician and hospital admission were significantly lower in the EBM group than
the other two groups. Higher frequency of breast feeding reduced the chance of
infection and its severity. Infants discharged below1500 gm grew well with
exclusive breast milk.
Address for Correspondence:Dr. Mohammad Faizul Haque
Khan, Medical Officer, Department
of Neonatology, Dhaka Shishu Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh E-mail:
khan.faizul@gmail.com
&amp;nbsp;
Management
of very low birth weight (weighing &amp;lt; 1500 gm) infants has always been a
problem for both clinician as well as parents. In the developed world survival
and outcome of these infants have improved tremendously in recent years accounting
for 80 – 90% survival rates for infants weighing 750 – 1500 gm [1,2]. Early neonatal intensive
care unit (NICU) discharge has been advocated for selected preterm infants to
reduce both the adverse environment of prolonged hospital stay and to encourage
earlier parental involvement by empowering parents to contribute to the ongoing
care of their infants and thereby reducing costs of care. Although several
studies have shown the benefits of early discharge from the hospital for
premature infants, it is still a common practice to delay discharge of these
infants until they reach a weight of 2000 gm or&amp;nbsp;more [3,4].&amp;nbsp;The consequences of
prolonged hospitalization are well-established. They are maternal deprivation
affecting the growth and development of the infants [5], skilled nursing
time that should be devoted to sick infants are spent in the routine care of
healthy infants, chances of increased nosocomial infection and considerable
drain of scarce health resources [3,6].&amp;nbsp;In this context, several studies concurrently
reported some criteria needed to be achieved before hospital discharge of the
premature infants. The creteria were temperature stability out of an incubator,
ability to suck and gain weight on oral intake and no symptoms [3,4,7]. All these studies suggest
that achieving these criteria, instead of attaining a targeted weight, are
sufficient to augment normal growth, reduce the incidence of RTI, diarhoea and
recurrent hospitalization provided the feeding&amp;nbsp;
regimen is nutritionally sound. 
The
World Health Organization (WHO) is in favour of mothers’ milk alone during the
first six months of life [9], though research data from industrialized
countries suggest that VLBW infants require additional nutrients which is
unavailable in unmodified mothers’ milk [10]. Another study reported that infants fed on
Preterm Formula (PTF) grew significantly better than those fed on breast milk
alone or in combination with PTF. These trails demonstrate that WHO feeding
strategy is not enough for VLBW infants during the first month of life [11]. Faced with this background,
the present study was undertaken to determine whether preterm neonates
discharged at or below 1500 gm can attain optimum growth&amp;nbsp; at&amp;nbsp;
home care with appropiate feeding regimens. The effetcs of different
feeding regimens on subsequent morbidity was also assessed.
Material and Methods
At
discharge mothers were instructed as to how to take care of their neonates and
to bring them regularly at follow up clinic specially designed to provide care
for the VLBW babies. The neonates were observed up to three consecutive
follow-ups from their date of discharge. In the follow up sessions information
was collected on weight, length, OFC and other pertinent variables. 
Data were
analyzed using SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) version 11.5. The
statistics used&amp;nbsp; were Chi-square (c2) or Fisher’s Exact Probability Test and ANOVA . 
Results
Baseline
characteristics show that median gestational age at birth was 31 weeks.
Approximately 57% of the neonates were admitted within 72 hours of birth with
median age at admission being 24 hours. Females were slightly higher (54.3%)
than the males (45.7%) (Table-1). 
Table-1: Baseline characteristics of neonates(n =
92)
&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
At 1st&amp;nbsp;follow
up
&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
At 2nd&amp;nbsp;follow
up
&amp;nbsp;
Anthropometric measurements at 3rd&amp;nbsp;follow up (median follow up time 6 months)
demonstrated that infants of mixed feeding and EBM groups&amp;nbsp; had the almost similar gain in&amp;nbsp; weight (6683±395, 6565±503).&amp;nbsp; Infants fed&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;
with infant&amp;nbsp; formula alone had&amp;nbsp; much lower wieght gain then the above two
groups (6235±351, p=0.001). Increase in OFC was also observed&amp;nbsp; significantly faster in EBM and mixed feeding
groups than that in infant formula group (p=0.003), although increase in length
was almost identical in all the three groups (p = 0.293).
Feeding pattern and comorbidity
&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Visit to physician and hospital admission
Causes of hospital admission
&amp;nbsp;
Conventionally
preterm infants are discharged from the hospital when they reach a prefixed
weight, although no published studies support the benefit of attaining a
specific weight before discharge. Several published studies dating from as
early as 1971 have presented data supporting earlier nursery discharge [1-4,6,7,12,13]. These studies have put
emphasis on infant’s capabilities related to maturity rather than weight as
discharge criteria. All have selected infants on the basis of their ability to
feed and maintain body temperature. In the present study as well the infants
were selected at discharge on the basis of their ability to maintain body
temperature outside incubator, able to suck and gain weight on oral intake with
no symptoms of systemic illness. No clear-cut feeding policy was suggested,
though breast milk was encouraged. The neonates after discharge fed on three
types of feeding regimens at home. The study demonstrated a steady growth of
the infants up to a median age of 6 months with EBM and mixed feeding compared
to infants fed on formula only. However, all the three groups of neonates
experienced RTI, diarhoea and anaemia to some extent with breast feeding group
suffering less frequently than the infant formula and mixed formula groups. The
frequency of visits to physician and hospital admission were significantly
lower in the EBM group than the other two groups. Frequency of health service
utilization was less in EBM group indicating less severity of infections in
this group than their two other counterparts.
The present study showed that breast milk alone was adequate to
achieve a targeted growth for VLBW infants. Higher frequency of breast feeding
lowered the chance of infection and its severity. The study, therefore,
concludes that VLBW infants, discharged on the basis of their behavioral
criteria, grow well provided their feeding regimen is nutritionally sound.
References
2.&amp;nbsp; Fanaroff AA,
Hack M, Walsh MC. The NICHD neonatal research network: changes in practice and
outcomes during the first 15 years. Semin Perinatol 2003; 27:
281-7.
4.&amp;nbsp; Schmidt RE,
Levine DH. Early discharge of low birth weight infants as a hospital policy. J
Perinatol 1990; 10: 396-8.
6.&amp;nbsp; Casiro OG, McKenzie ME,
McFadyen L et al. Earlier discharge with community-based intervention for
low birthweight infants: a randomized trial. Pediatrics 1993; 92:
128-34.
8.&amp;nbsp; Were FN, Bwibo NO.
Neonatal nutrition and later outcomes of very low birthweight infants at
Kenyatta National Hospital. African Health Services; 7(2):&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 108-14.
10.Brooke OG, Wood Cand
Barley J. Energy balance, nitrogen balance, and growth in preterm infants fed
on expressed milk, a preterm infant formula, and two low-solute adapted
formulae. Arch Dis Child 1982; 57: 898-904.
12.Lucas A. Early nutrition
and later outcome. Nutrition of the very low birth weight infant. Nestle
Nutrition Workshop Series, Lippincott Williums &amp;amp; Wilkins, Philadelphia,
1999; 43: 2-18.
14.Lucas A, Morley R, Cole
TJ, Gore SM. Early diet in in preterm babies and developmental status at 18
months. The Lancet 1990; 335: 1477-81.
</description>

            </item>
            
    <copyright>2026 Ibrahim Medical College. All rights reserved.</copyright>
</channel>
</rss>
