<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://imcjms.com/public/assets/rss.css" ?><rss version="2.0">
<channel>
    <title>IMC Journal of Medical Science</title>
    <link>https://imcjms.com/public</link>
    <description>Ibrahim Medical College Journal of Medical Science</description>

                        <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Factors associated with secondary infertility]]></title>

                                    <author><![CDATA[Hasina Momtaz]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Meerjady Sabrina Flora]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Sonia Shirin]]></author>
                
                <link data-url="https://imcjms.com/public/registration/journal_full_text/204">
    https://imcjms.com/public/registration/journal_full_text/204
</link>
                <pubDate>Sun, 30 Apr 2017 15:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
                <category><![CDATA[Original Article]]></category>
                <comments><![CDATA[Ibrahim Med. Coll. J. 2011; 5(1): 17-21]]></comments>
                <description>Infertility
is an experience that strikes at the very core of a woman’s life and as a whole
her family and society. Studies in Bangladesh to evaluate the factors are
difficult to come by. This case control study was carried out from Jan 2010 to
June 2010 to find out the factors associated with secondary infertility. A
total of 70 cases were selected from the infertility unit of Bangabandhu Sheikh
Mujib Medical University and 70 unmatched controls from the same hospital
attending the pediatrics unit with their children were also recruited. Data
were collected by interview and review of documents. No age difference was
noticed between the cases (29.26 ± 4.13) and controls (29.21 ± 3.95).
Association of secondary infertility was found with body mass index (p=0.036),
previous bad obstetric history (p = 0.011) and previous caesarian delivery
(p=0.044). Women with secondary infertility were more than four times more
likely to have gynecological problem(s) than their fertile counterparts [OR
4.76 with 95% CI (2.018-11.270)]. The factors identified in this study might
help the policy makers in designing prevention and health care programmes and
thus reducing the hidden burden of secondary infertility.
Address for Correspondence:Dr. Hasina Momtaz, Lecturer,
Department of Community Medicine, Ibrahim Medical College, 122 Kazi Nazrul
Islam, Avenue, Shahbagh, Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh
&amp;nbsp;
Secondary
infertility refers to couples who are unable to conceive after one year of
unprotected intercourse after a previous pregnancy in the reproductive age
group. Globally, approximately, 10-15% of couples are infertile, affecting more
than 80 million people worldwide. Secondary infertility outnumbers primary
infertility.1
Either
the male or female partners can be responsible for infertility in around 30%
cases or both are involved in another 25 to 30% cases. In the remaining 10 to
15% case no cause could be found, which is known as unexplained infertility.4&amp;nbsp;Many factors including
infectious, environmental, genetic, and even dietary in origin can contribute
to infertility. Because of the under reporting of secondary infertility in
institution based studies, information on the causes of infertility is likely
to consistently underestimate the role of infection, which is the most frequent
cause of secondary infertility.5
In
western countries, obesity affects approximately half of the general population
and is thus a common problem among the infertile population. Obese women have a
higher prevalence of infertility compared with their lean counterparts. The
majority of women with an ovulatory disorder contributing to their infertility
have polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and a significant proportion of women
with PCOS are obese. Ovulation disorders and obesity-associated infertility
represent a group of infertile couples that are relatively simple to treat.7
In
Bangladesh very little is known about the status of infertility. However, the
problem is considered quite prevalent. According to a WHO survey report,
infertility rate was found to be 6.9 percent and from BIRPERHT’s Reproductive
Health Care Need Study (RHCNS), 1996 primary infertility rate was estimated at
3.2 percent and secondary infertility rate was found to be 2.9 percent.9
Infertility
has been relatively neglected as both a health problem and a subject for social
science research in South Asia, as well as the developing world. The general
thrust of both programmers and research has been on the correlates of high
fertility and its relation rather than on understanding the context of
infertility, its cause and consequences. Moreover, in pronatalist cultures such
as those of India, and South Asia more generally, the consequences of
infertility for women can be devastating.10
&amp;nbsp;
This
case control study was conducted on 70 cases and 70 unmatched controls for a
period of 6 months commencing from January 2010. Women who failed to conceive
after 1 year of unprotected intercourse with a history of one previous
conception, and coming to the infertility unit of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib
Medical University (BSMMU) during data collection period, were taken as cases.
Women having a second child and attending the pediatric unit of BSMMU for
treatment or vaccination of their baby were taken as controls. The cases were
selected by purposive sampling.
Data
were cleaned, edited, coded and computed with the help of soft-ware SPSS
version 11.5. Quantitative data were analyzed to find out the mean and standard
deviation and mean differences were tested by Student’s t-test. Qualitative
data were analyzed to estimate the proportion and were tested by c2&amp;nbsp;test. Odds Ratio with 95%
confidence interval was estimated.
Results
&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Cases,
on average, got married at a later age (20.80 ± 4.70) than the controls (19.89
± 3.20). Use of hormonal contraception was more common in cases (54.3%) than in
controls (48.6%). There was no difference in menstrual hygiene. More than half
of the infertile women (55.7%) had poor delivery outcome in their first
pregnancy whereas only one third of controls had similar findings (34.3%).
Secondary infertile couples were 2.4 times more likely to have a bad obstetric
outcome in their previous pregnancy than fertile couples [OR 2.68 with 95% CI
(1.01 to 7.12)]. The chance of developing secondary infertility is 2.68 times
more with previous caesarian delivery than normal vaginal delivery (Table-2).
Table-2: Distribution of reproductive characteristics
between cases and controls
&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Although
the distribution was not significantly different, it showed a higher proportion
of class II obese in cases (14.3%) than in controls (2.99%). Association was
found between body mass index (BMI) and secondary infertility. Cases were, on
average, with 1.5 higher BMI than in controls (p=0.036, Table- 4).
Table-4: Distribution of body mass index between
cases and controls
&amp;nbsp;
The
study was undertaken to gain insight into the problem of infertility. The
relationship between secondary infertility and its associated factors is
difficult to study. Prospective studies need large cohorts, which are difficult
and expensive to follow and have the additional drawback of losing the subjects
in the control group. This case control study was carried out in 70 cases and
70 unmatched controls to find out the factors associated with secondary
infertility. Although it was not planned, controls matched with cases in
relation to age and other socio-demographic variables as no difference was
noticed between the two groups. But a previous study found that prevalence of
secondary infertility increased with age from 4% in women aged 15-24 years to
17% in those &amp;gt;39 years.2
Pelvic
surgery shows, proportion of caesarian section was more in controls (63.6%)
than cases (48.1%). But the number of pelvic surgery was more in cases than
controls. There was no significant difference in pelvic surgery between cases
and controls. But in other studies, pelvic surgery was found to be a contributing
factor for development of secondary infertility.13&amp;nbsp;This difference probably was
attributed to differences in sample characteristics. 
Detection
of any gynecological factors that may be associated with secondary infertility
was explored by checking the ultasonography report. Association was found
between abnormal ultrasonogram findings with secondary infertility. Risk of
developing secondary infertility was 4.76 times more with abnormal findings in
ultra sonogram report than with normal findings. The abnormal finding includes
PCOS,fibroid uterus
and others. And the distribution shows higher proportion of abnormal findings
contributing to PCOS. Association of secondary infertility with PCOS was also
found in other studies.15
Conclusion
&amp;nbsp;
1.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Ali T, Sami N, Khuwaja A.
Are unhygienic practices during the menstrual, partum and postpartum periods
risk factors for secondary infertility? J Health Popul. Nutr 2007; 25(2):
189-194.
3.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Papreen N, Sharma A,
Sabin K, Begum L, Ahsan SK, Baqui AH. Living with infertility: experiences
among Urban slum populations in Bangladesh. Bangladesh Health Matters
2000; 8(15): 33-44.
5.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Barbara T. The
epidemiology of infertility in Aberdeen Medical Sociology Unit. Aberdeen Br
Med J 1990; 301: 148-152.
7.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Wilkes S,&amp;nbsp;Murdoch E,
Alison D. Obesity and female fertility: primary care perspective. Journal of
Family Planning and Reproductive Health Care 2009; 35: 181-185.
9.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Bangladesh Institute of
Research for Promotion of Essential and Reproductive Health and Technologies
(BIRPERHT), Briefing paper on Assessment of Reproductive Health Care needs and
Review of Services provided at the level of Thana, Union and Village, Dhaka,
Bangladesh, 1997; 5: 1-4.
11.Tzonou A, Hsieh C,
Trichopoulos D, Aravandinos D, Kalandidi A, Margaris D et al. Induced
abortions, miscarriages, and tobacco smoking as risk factors for secondary
infertility. J Epidemiol Community Health 1993; 47(1): 36-39.
13.Homan M, Davies R, Norman:
The impact of lifestyle factors on reproductive performance in the general
population and those undergoing infertility treatments. Human Reproduction and
Embryology oxfordjournals.org 2007.
15.Dewailly
S,&amp;nbsp;Hieronimus P, Mirakian N. Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). D’Endocrinologe
2010; 71(1): 8-13.</description>

            </item>
            
    <copyright>2026 Ibrahim Medical College. All rights reserved.</copyright>
</channel>
</rss>
