<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://imcjms.com/public/assets/rss.css" ?><rss version="2.0">
<channel>
    <title>IMC Journal of Medical Science</title>
    <link>https://imcjms.com/public</link>
    <description>Ibrahim Medical College Journal of Medical Science</description>

                        <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Consequences of misdiagnosis of diabetic Charcot arthropathy of the ankle]]></title>

                                    <author><![CDATA[Chowdhury Iqbal Mahmud]]></author>
                
                <link data-url="https://imcjms.com/public/registration/journal_full_text/198">
    https://imcjms.com/public/registration/journal_full_text/198
</link>
                <pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2017 11:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
                <category><![CDATA[Clinical Case Report]]></category>
                <comments><![CDATA[Ibrahim Med. Coll. J. 2010; 4(2): 83-86]]></comments>
                <description>Permanent
deformity and disability can occur in diabetic Charcot arthropathy (neuropathic
arthropathy) if not diagnosed and treated promptly. We report two patients with
uncontrolled diabetes mellitus in whom the diagnosis of ankle neuro-arthropathy
was delayed by up to six months, with misdiagnoses including ankle arthritis,
osteomyelitis and cellulitis. The clinical scenario and appearances of the
ankle and foot were typical of Charcot arthropathy. Unfortunately, both of them
sustained ankle fracture-dislocation without a history of significant trauma.
Both the patients were treated by ankle arthrodesis (fusion of joint).
Prevention and early diagnosis of diabetic foot is the key to avoid the
development of complications. In diabetic patients, a higher index of suspicion
for the possibility of Charcot’s disease is needed.
Address for Correspondence: Dr. Chowdhury Iqbal Mahmud, Registrar
(Orthopaedics), Room No.1110, BIRDEM Hospital, Ibrahim Memorial Diabetic
Centre, 122, Kazi Nazrul Islam Avenue, Dhaka-1000, E-mail: cimahmud@yahoo.co.uk
&amp;nbsp;
Diabetic
Charcot arthropathy, also known as neuropathic arthropathy, is a part of
diabetic foot disease. Diabetic foot is usually associated with neuropathy
which may lead to ulceration and neuroarthropathy. Diabetic neuropathic
arthropathy is a destructive process of the bony components of a denervated
joint. Diabetes mellitus is now the most common cause of neuro-arthropathy,
which often manifests itself as a ‘Charcot foot’. Patients usually have
established diabetes with a sensory neuropathy, and present with painless or
painful swelling and warmth in the region of the ankle and/or mid foot.1,2
&amp;nbsp;
A 80-year-old man with type 2 diabetes of 15 years duration was
reffered to BIRDEM hospital OPD with a 7 days history of dull pain and swelling
in his right ankle and foot following a minor trauma. He was unable to walk and
his ankle was grossly deformed and unstable. There were no signs of
inflammation, and sensation in the foot including pain and touch was reduced.
He was known to have neuropathy and peripheral vascular disease with poor
control of blood sugar. Intermittent pain and swelling in the foot had started
six months previously. He was treated by doctors with diagnosis of ankle
arthritis and osteomyelitis on different ocassions. Several courses of
antibiotics and analgesics were prescribed. Two separate ankle and foot X-rays
were done in BIRDEM, which revealed gross osteopenia, soft tissue swelling and
fracture-dislocation of the right ankle with bony fragmentation of the mid foot
(Fig.1). His inflammatory markers of the blood were unremarkable.
Fig.
1. Pre-operative X-ray:Fracture and dislocation in a right
ankle Charcot joint
&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
A
65-year-old man with type 2 diabetes of eight years duration was referred to
BIRDEM hospital OPD with unexplained pain and swelling in his left foot and
ankle. He was known to have retinopathy, neuropathy and peripheral vascular
disease. His glycaemic control was poor. Pain and swelling in the ankle and
foot had started six months previously. He could walk with the help of a
crutch. His ankle was deformed and unstable, and sensation in the foot
including pain and touch was reduced. He had been investigated by his general
practitioner. As there was no history of trauma, his physician did not get a
x-rays done. Alkaline phosphatase, C-reactive protein, urate level were
slightly elevated and rheumatoid factor was normal. Possible diagnosis was
considered as gout and cellulitis and several courses of antibiotics were
prescribed.
&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Neuroarthropathy,
or “Charcot arthropathy”, is a diagnosis that predates the modern era of
long-term survival with diabetes, having been first described in patients with
tertiary syphilis.5&amp;nbsp;Charcot
arthropathy is a severe destructive arthropathy which can occur in any patient
with a sensory deficit. It was originally described in tertiary syphilis.
Nowadays most cases occur in diabetics, but about 10% of Charcot patients have
other causes, such as spina bifida, hereditary motor/sensory neuroapthy,
post-traumatic sensory deficits, alcoholic peripheral neuropathy and sensory
neuropathy of unknown origin.6,7
The
progression of Charcot neuroarthropathy most often follows a predictable
clinical and radiographic pattern, and is classified by the widely recognized
Eichenholtz classification, which consist of 3 stages of fragmentation,
coalescence and reconstruction.11&amp;nbsp;Charcot arthropathy can be sudden and
dramatic. It is one of the most difficult and intractable sources of excess
mechanical pressure in the diabetic foot and can create large osseous
prominences in various locations. Ulceration and rapid progression to
osteomyelitis can follow. A large prospective study of risk factors for
ulcerations in a population of male diabetic patients showed that the presence
of Charcot arthropathy carried the highest relative risk of all of the factors
examined, eclipsing even the absence of protective sensation.12
Management
is based on a variety of factors, including location, phase of the disease
process, presence of infection, deformity, and comorbidities. Treatment should
be guided by specific and realistic goals, depending on the severity of the
disease and the patient’s functional capacity. This can vary from basic shoe
modifications to major limb amputations. It is important to prevent the
development of Charcot arthropathy by controlling blood sugar and early
diagnosis of diabetic foot. Marked osteopenia has been noted in patients with
Charcot neuroarthropathy and Bisphosphonates have shown promising short-term
results in preventing bone resorption.14
Arthrodesis
(fusion of joint) may be the only option in severly unstable and deformed
joint. Effective internal fixation techniques in arthrodesis include screws,
pin, and plate fixation. Simon et al. showed promising results with
fusion during the fragmentation stage, with no major complications, and a
return to regular shoe wear in a mean of 27 weeks.17&amp;nbsp;Correction of deformity may
be a good option by midfoot osteotomy-fusion, triple fusion or
tibio-talo-calcaneal fusion, depending on the level of deformity.6,18
&amp;nbsp;
There is
clearly a worrying lack of awareness of the possibility of Charcot arthropathy
in diabetic patients presenting with acute foot and ankle swelling. A high
index of diagnostic suspicion is required. Diabetic Charcot feet are often
thought to be relatively rare, but this is not the impression received by our
department. Indeed, more patients with the condition appear to be presenting.
Strict metabolic control, prevention or minimisation of deformity by total
contact casting or use of a diabetic walker boot and avoidance of weight
bearing may prevent or delay the development of complication of diabetic
arthropathy. A safe clinical policy would be to assume that diabetic patients
with recent onset of foot or ankle swelling have neuroarthropathy until proved
otherwise.
References
2.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Jeffcoate W, Lima J, and
Nobrega L. The Charcot foot. Diabetic Med 2000; 17: 253–258.
4.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Jude EB, Selby POL,
Burgess J et al. Biphosphonates in the treatment of Charcot neuro arthropathy:
a double blind randomised controlled trial. Diabetologia 2001; 44:
2032–2037.
6.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Schon LC, Easley ME and
Weinfeld SB. Charcot neuroarthropathy of the foot and ankle.Clin Orthop
Relat Res 1998; 349: 116-131.
8.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Gough A, Abraha H, Li F et
al. Measurement markers of osteoclast and osteoblast activity in patients
with acute and chronic diabetic Charcot neuroarthropathy. Diabet Med
1997; 14: 527-531.
10.Brodsky JW. The diabetic
foot, in Coughlin MJ, Mann RA, Saltzman CL, eds: Surgery of the foot and ankle,
ed 8. St. Louis, MO, Mosby, 2006; 1281-1368.
12.Boyko EJ, Ahroni JH,
Stensel V, Forsberg RC, Davignon DR, Smith DG. A prospective study of risk
factors for diabetic foot ulcer. The seattle diabetic foot study. Diabetes
Care 1999; 22: 1036-42.
14.Rogers MJ. New insights
into the molecular mechanisms of action of bisphosphonates. Curr Pharm Des
2003; 9: 2643-2658.
16.Shaw JE, Hsi WL, Ulbrecht
JS, Norkitis A, Becker MB, Cavanagh PR. The mechanism of plantar unloading in
total contact casts: Implications for design and clinical use. Foot Ankle
Int 1997; 18: 809-817.
18.GJ Sammarco and SF Conti.
Surgical treatment of neuroparthropathic foot deformity. Foot and Ankle Int
1998; 19: 102–109.</description>

            </item>
            
    <copyright>2026 Ibrahim Medical College. All rights reserved.</copyright>
</channel>
</rss>
