<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://imcjms.com/assets/rss.css" ?><rss version="2.0">
<channel>
    <title>IMC Journal of Medical Science</title>
    <link>https://imcjms.com</link>
    <description>Ibrahim Medical College Journal of Medical Science</description>

                        <item>
                <title><![CDATA[The prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection among students of a medical college
in Bangladesh]]></title>

                                    <author><![CDATA[Shahida Akter*]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Rehana Khatun]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Aunta Melan]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Saimun Nahar Rumana]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Elisha Khandker]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Mohsina Mahmud]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Fahmida Rahman]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Md. Shariful Alam Jilani]]></author>
                
                <link data-url="https://imcjms.com/registration/journal_full_text/584">
    https://imcjms.com/registration/journal_full_text/584
</link>
                <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2025 10:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
                <category><![CDATA[Original Article]]></category>
                <comments><![CDATA[July 2025; Vol. 19(2):009]]></comments>
                <description>Abstract
Background
and objectives: The
prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection
differs in relation to the human population, age, living conditions, lifestyle,
socioeconomic status and geographic location. The purpose of the present study
was to evaluate the prevalence of H.pylori
infection among students of Ibrahim
Medical College, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Materials
and methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at the K.A.
Monsur Research Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, Ibrahim Medical
College. A structured questionnaire was used to collect socio-demographic information and clinical
history. Blood and stool samples were collected from each participant. Serum H.
pylori CagA IgG and H.pylori IgA antibodies were determined using
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and H. pylori stool antigen (HPSAg) was detected by immunochromatographic
test (ICT).
Results: A
total of 85 participants were enrolled in this study.
The overall H. pylori infection rate
was 69.4% by positive stool antigen test and /or the presence of H. pylori specific CagA IgG or IgA
antibodies in serum. H. pylori stool
antigen was detected in 9 (10.6%) individuals, of whom 8 (88.9%) were also
positive for H. pylori specific CagA
IgG and / or IgA antibodies. Among 85 participants, CagA IgG and IgA were
positive in 43 (50.6%) and 46 (54.1%) students, respectively, while 31 (36.5%)
were positive for both antibodies. IgA
positivity rate was significantly higher (p≤0.005) in individuals who tested
positive for CagA-IgG compared to those negative for CagA-IgG antibody.
Gastrointestinal symptoms were reported by 17 (20.0%) participants, while 68
(80.0%) were asymptomatic. No significant difference in antibody positivity
rates was observed between symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals in this
study.
Conclusion:
The study revealed that H. pylori infection is common among the medical students in
Bangladesh. This underscores the importance of improving awareness and early
detection strategies among medical students to minimize transmission and
associated health risks.
July 2025; Vol. 19(2):009.&amp;nbsp; DOI: https://doi.org/10.55010/imcjms.19.019
*Correspondence: Shahida Akter, Department of Microbiology.
Ibrahim Medical College, 1/A Ibrahim Sarani,
Shegunbagicha, Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh. Email: shahidamicro@gmail.com
© 2025 The Author(s). This is an open access article
distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution
License(CC BY 4.0).
&amp;nbsp;
Introduction
Helicobacter
pylori (H.
pylori) is a gram-negative, spiral-shaped, microaerophilic bacterium that
colonizes the human gastric mucosa. A large number of people remain
asymptomatic despite being infected with H.
pylori [1]. Once acquired, the infection persists throughout life unless
treated with specific antimicrobials [2]. Chronic infection by H. pylori is
recognized as the leading cause of gastric and duodenal ulcer disease and is also
associated with gastric adenocarcinoma and mucosa- associated lymphoid tissue
(MALT)[3,4].
A 2017 meta-analysis found that the
overall global prevalence of H.pylori
infection was 44.3%, with a higher rate of 50.8% in developing countries
compared to 34.7% in developed countries [5]. In 2024, the prevalence of H. pylori
infection among the asymptomatic urban population of Bangladesh was reported to
be 40.5% [6]. In 2022, H. pylori-specific
IgG and IgA antibodies were detected in 64.9% and 55.1% of participants,
respectively, among the asymptomatic rural population in Bangladesh [7]. H. pylori infection is primarily
transmitted through fecal-oral, oral-oral, or gastro-oral routes, often due to
poor sanitation, overcrowding, contaminated water, and low levels of education,
especially in early childhood [8-10].
Prevalence of H. pylori is
strongly age-dependent, rising steadily from childhood through middle age, and then
declining in the very elderly due to gastric atrophy and increased antibiotic
use [11]. Both Habib et al. and Rahman et
al. reported that the highest rates of infection were observed in
individuals under 30 years of age, with detection rates of 78.3% and 50%,
respectively [12,13]. Accurate diagnosis and effective management of H.pylori infection can greatly
contribute to its eradication and prevent disease complications.
Data on the prevalence of H. pylori
infection among medical college students in Bangladesh are limited. Studying
this population is particularly important because of their frequent exposure to
healthcare settings, which has been implicated as a significant risk factor for
acquiring H. pylori infection by several studies [14,15]. Liu et al.
reported that the overall prevalence of H. pylori infection was 70.0%
among medical personnel, compared to that of 44.6% among the general population
in China [16]. In addition, the students often share communal living spaces,
such as hostels, which may further facilitate transmission. As future
healthcare providers, identifying asymptomatic carriers and associated risk
factors can inform early interventions and guide targeted public health
strategies for this group [17]. The present study aimed to evaluate the prevalence
of H.
pylori infection among medical students affiliated with a
tertiary-level hospital in Dhaka, Bangladesh, by detecting H. pylori antigen
in stool and, H. pylori-specific IgA and CagA-IgG antibodies in serum
using serologic methods.
&amp;nbsp;
Materials and
Methods
Sample collection
and laboratory work were done at K. A. Monsur Research Laboratory, at the
Department of Microbiology of Ibrahim Medical College, Dhaka. This cross-sectional study was conducted in
2021 among 85 fourth-year MBBS students studying at Ibrahim Medical College. Fourth-year students were
selected purposively as the MBBS curriculum covers Microbiology during the fourth
year. After explaining the nature and purpose of the study, all participants
provided informed written consent. A structured questionnaire was used to
record socio-demographic information and clinical history. The study was
approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee and Research Review Board of
Ibrahim Medical College. All consenting fourth-year students were included in
the study, irrespective of age, gender, nationality or presence of dyspeptic
symptoms. Dyspeptic symptoms were defined as having two or more of the
following gastrointestinal symptoms: dyspepsia,
abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting and belching [18]. Individuals without any of
these symptoms were considered as asymptomatic for H. pylori infection.
Students who had taken antibiotics, colloidal bismuth compounds, proton pump
inhibitors (PPIs) or H2 blockers within four weeks prior to sample collection
were excluded.
H. pylori infection was defined if an individual was found positive for H.pylori antigen in stool and/or anti-H. pylori CagA-IgG and/or anti-H. pylori IgA in serum using serologic methods
[7]. Approximately 2.5 ml blood sample was collected from each participant.
After centrifugation at 1500 rpm for 10 minutes, separated serum was stored at
-20℃ and used later for
detection of H. pylori IgA and
CagA-IgG antibodies. Approximately 20-30 grams of fresh stool sample was
collected from each participant in a clean, wide-mouth and screw-capped
container, and tested for H. pylori stool antigen within 6 hours of collection.
Stool antigen was detected by immune chromatography using ABON one strip H.pylori
antigen ICT test device
(Inverness Medical Innovation Hong Kong Ltd., Hong Kong). Approximately
50 mg of stool was obtained from at least three different areas of each stool
specimen. The stool was then mixed with
supplied extraction buffer solution using a vortex mixer, and centrifuged
at 4000 rpm for 5 minutes. After centrifugation, two drops of supernatant were
transferred into the sample well of the test device and kept at room
temperature for 10 minutes. The result was then recorded. A positive result was
indicated by the presence of purple-pink line along with the control line. When
only the control line appeared, the result was considered negative. If no
control line appeared, the result was termed as invalid. Serum anti-H. pylori CagA-IgG and anti-H.pylori IgA antibodies were determined
by quantitative enzyme-linked immune sorbent assay (ELISA) using commercial
kits namely CagA IgG ELISA and Helicobacter
pylori IgA ELISA (DRG International Inc., USA), respectively. The tests
were performed and interpreted according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
The present study did not evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the test
methods. However, the manufacturer (DRG International Inc., USA) reported that
the sensitivity and specificity of both ELISA kits are greater than 90% for
detecting H. pylori-specific
antibodies. This is comparable to previously reported results for other H. pylori ELISAs, which demonstrated a
sensitivity of 97.6% and a specificity of 90.5%. [19]. Participants who were positive for H. pylori stool antigen were treated with a proton pump inhibitor
(PPI) and the two antibiotics, amoxicillin and metronidazole, for 14 days to
eradicate H. pylori infection [20,21].
Statistical analyses were performed using Statistical Product and Service
Solutions (SPSS), version 20. Categorical values between two groups were
compared using chi-square test. Differences were considered statistically
significant at p≤ 0.05.
&amp;nbsp;
Result
A total of 85participants were
enrolled in this study, with a mean age of 22.01 (SD ±1.14) years. Of them, 29
(34.11%) were male and 56 (65.88%) were female. All participants came from
middle- or upper-class backgrounds with the majority having graduate parents
(87.1% of fathers, and 71.8% of mothers). All subjects reported practicing hand
hygiene and drinking safe water. Among 85 participants tested, 59 (69.4%) were positive for H. pylori infection either by positive
stool antigen test or by the presence of serum H. pylori-specific CagA-IgG
or IgA antibodies.
&amp;nbsp;
Table-1:
Comparison of H. pylori stool antigen
with the presence of serum anti-H. pylori CagA-IgG and anti-H. pylori IgA
antibodies
&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Among 85 individuals tested, 9 (10.6%)
were positive for H. pylori stool
antigen, of whom 8 were also positive for H.
pylori-specific CagA-IgG and/or IgA antibodies. Out of 76 stool antigen-negative
cases, 50 demonstrated positive result for CagA-IgG and/or IgA antibodies.
There was no significant association between stool antigen positivity and
presence of H. pylori-specific
antibodies among the study population. Overall, 58 (68.2%) participants tested
positive for H. pylori infection
using antibody-based methods. (Table-1).
&amp;nbsp;
Table-2:
Comparison of serum anti-H. pylori
CagA-IgG with anti-H. pylori IgA of the study population (N=85)
&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Among 85 enrolled students, anti-H. pylori CagA-IgG and IgA antibodies were
detected in 43 (50.6%) and 46 (54.1%) individuals, respectively. Both antibodies
were detected in 31 cases. IgA positivity rate was significantly higher (p≤0.005)
in individuals who tested positive for CagA-IgG compared to those who were negative
for Cag-IgG antibody. (Table-2)
&amp;nbsp;
Table-3:
The relationship between serum anti-H.
pylori CagA-IgG and anti-H.pylori IgA antibodies among symptomatic and
asymptomatic cases.
&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Table-3 shows that, out of 85
participants, 17 (20.0%) complained of gastrointestinal symptoms whereas 68
(80.0%) were asymptomatic. No significant difference was observed in antibody
positivity rates between symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals in this
study.
&amp;nbsp;
Table-4:
Comparison of H. pylori stool antigen
with the symptomatic and asymptomatic cases
&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Table-4 shows that, out of 85
participants, 17 (20.0%) complained of gastrointestinal symptoms whereas 68
(80.0%) were asymptomatic. A statistically significant association was found
between stool antigen positivity and the presence of symptoms among the study
population.
&amp;nbsp;
Discussion
It is widely recognized that H. pylori is
associated not only with peptic ulcer disease but also with gastric carcinoma
and MALT lymphoma [22]. Several studies have shown that the prevalence of H. pylori among medical personnel tends to
be higher than that in general population, one reason being their frequent
exposure to hospital settings [23-25]. The present study aimed to evaluate prevalence
of H.
pylori infection among fourth-year MBBS students studying at
Ibrahim Medical College, Dhaka.
In this study, an individual was
considered positive for H. pylori
infection based on a positive stool antigen test and/or the presence of H. pylori-specific CagA-IgG and/or IgA
antibodies in serum. Overall, 69.4% of the study population tested positive for
H. pylori infection in this study.
However, an overall detection rate of 79.5% was observed in a previous study
conducted in Bangladesh among asymptomatic rural children and adolescents [7].
The comparatively lower detection rate in this study may be attributed to
better hygienic practices among medical students, who predominantly came from
higher educational and socio-economic backgrounds [26].
Approximately 10.6% of individuals
demonstrated a positive stool antigen test in the current study. Detection of H. pylori antigen in stool indicates
active infection [27]. Rajan et al.
found a stool antigen positivity rate of 8.4% in a hospital-based study in
Singapore, which is consistent with this finding [28]. In contrast, Mazumder et
al. detected stool antigen in 24.9% of enrolled children and adolescents in a
rural area of Bangladesh [7]. This discrepancy may be attributed to lower
hygienic practices among children compared to the adult subjects in the current
study, as well as differences in socio-economic status and availability of
sanitation facilities.
The prevalence of H. pylori-specific antibodies was reported as 55.8% using
immunochromatography among students at a medical university in Iraq, compared
to an overall 68.2% antibody positivity rate observed in the present study
[29]. This discrepancy may be due to the higher sensitivity of ELISA-based
assays in contrast to ICT. 
Although 8 of the 9 participants who
were positive for H. pylori stool
antigen also tested positive for CagA-IgG and/or IgA antibodies, the association
was not statistically significant, likely due to the small number of stool
antigen-positive cases.
In our study, IgA positivity rate was
significantly higher in individuals who tested positive for CagA-IgG antibody
compared to those who were negative for CagA-IgG which corroborates the finding
of Rautelin et al. (2000), who theorized that CagA- positive infections may
induce a markedly higher IgA response than CagA-negative infections. CagA is an
immunodominant protein of H. pylori,
which is associated with cytoskeletal rearrangements and morphological changes
in the host cell [30-33]. Previous research suggests that CagA-positive H. pylori strains are more likely to
induce gastric inflammation and the subsequent development of peptic ulcer disease
and gastric cancer compared to infections with CagA-negative strains [34-37]. 
In the present study, 31 (36.5%)
participants tested positive for both CagA-IgG and IgA antibodies. Rautelin et
al. observed that two-thirds of the subjects demonstrating both CagA-IgG and
IgA antibodies had more severe gastric inflammation and were probably at higher
risk for severe long-term sequelae [33]. In this study, antibody positivity did
not differ significantly between participants with and without gastrointestinal
symptoms, which is consistent with the findings of several studies conducted in
Bangladesh and other Asian countries [38-41].
The current study showed that a large
proportion of the study population demonstrated both IgA and CagA-IgG classes
of H. pylori-specific antibodies. The simultaneous presence of these
antibodies is important, regardless of symptom status, as it increases the risk
of complications such as peptic ulcer disease and gastric carcinoma. 
&amp;nbsp;Stool antigen (HpSA)
positivity was observed in35.2%ofsymptomatic
individuals. Detection of H. pylori
antigen (HpSA) in stool among symptomatic
individuals indicates an active infection. Patients having two or more
gastrointestinal symptoms were more likely to demonstrate a positive stool
antigen test which is consistent with the findings of other studies conducted
in Bangladesh and other Asian countries [27,42,43].
The organism is primarily transmitted through
contaminated water and food, as well as direct person-to-person contact.
Therefore, raising awareness among medical students is essential to help reduce
the transmission. A limitation of our study was that only fourth-year MBBS
students were included. However, it is fundamental to conduct large-scale
studies which not only investigate the prevalence of the H. pylori among medical students but also thoroughly evaluate the
determinants contributing to its transmission.
&amp;nbsp;
Conclusion
The study revealed that H. pylori infection is highly prevalent
among medical students in Bangladesh. Given the risk of transmission and
potential ling-term complications, it is essential to increase awareness and
implement early detection strategies in this population. Further large-scale
studies are required to assess the prevalence across different groups and to
identify the key determinants contributing to infection and transmission.
&amp;nbsp;
Conflict
of interest
The authors declare that there is no
conflict of interest.
&amp;nbsp;
Funding
This study was funded by Ibrahim
Medical College.
&amp;nbsp;
Author
contributions
Authors’ contributions SA: sample/data
collection, laboratory work, data entry and analysis and manuscript writing; RK:
data collection, laboratory work. AM: Data entry and analysis, editing of
manuscript.SN and EK sample/data collection; SPSS: data entry; MM: data
collection, data entry. FR: sample/data collection, laboratory work, data entry
and analysis; MSAJ: Idea generation, study design, data analysis.
&amp;nbsp;
References
1.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Cover TL, Blaser MJ. Helicobacter
pylori in health and disease. Gastroenterology.&amp;nbsp;2009; 136(6): 1863-1873. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2009.01.073.
2.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Miranda AC, Machado RS, Silva EM,
Kawakami E. Seroprevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection among
children of low socioeconomic level in São Paulo. Sao Paulo Med J. 2010;
128(4): 187-191. doi:10.1590/s1516-31802010000400002.
3.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Goodwin CS, Worsley BW. Microbiology of Helicobacter
pylori. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 1993; 22(1): 5-19.
4.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Sachs G, Scott DR, Wen Y. Gastric
infection by Helicobacter pylori. Curr
Gastroenterol Rep. 2011; 13(6): 540-546.
doi:10.1007/s11894-011-0226-4.
5.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Hooi JKY, Lai WY, Ng WK, Suen MMY,
Underwood FE, Tanyingoh D, et al. Global prevalence of Helicobacter pyloriinfection:
systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastroenterology. 2017; 153(2): 420-429. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2017.04.022.
6.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Jarin I, Ahmed T, Nahar J J. Understanding Helicobacter pylori Infection Prevalence
and Associated Factors in slum and swampy areas of Narayanganj, Bangladesh:
Findings from Medical Camps.
7.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Mazumder
S, Rahman F, Akter F, Khatun R, Akter S, Saha SP, et al. Asymptomatic Helicobacter
pylori infection among rural children and adolescents in Bangladesh. IMC J Med Sci.
2022; 16(2): 007. doi: https://doi.org/10.55010/imcjms.16.017.
8.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Windle HJ,
Kelleher D, Crabtree JE. Childhood Helicobacter
pylori infection and growth impairment in developing countries: a vicious
cycle? Pediatrics. 2007; 119(3): e754-9.
doi:10.1542/peds.2006-2196.
9.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Nicoline FT, Ndip RN. A South African perspective on Helicobacter pylori: prevalence,
epidemiology and antimicrobial chemotherapy. Afr J Microbiol. 2013; 7(21):
2430-7. doi:10.5897/AJMR2013.5594.
10.&amp;nbsp; Ahmed KS, Khan AA,
Ahmed I, Tiwari SK, Habeeb MA, Ali SM, et al. Prevalence study to elucidate the
transmission pathways of Helicobacter
pylori at oral and gastroduodenal sites of a South Indian population. Singap Med J. 2006; 47(4): 291–6.
11.&amp;nbsp; Wang
X, Shu X, Li Q, LiY, Chen Z, Wang Y, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of Helicobacter
pylori infection in Wuwei, a high-risk area for gastric cancer in northwest
China: an all-ages population-based cross-sectional study. Helicobacter.
2021; 26(4): e12810. doi:10.1111/hel.12810.
12.&amp;nbsp; Habib AM, Alam MJ,
Rudra B, Quader A, Al-Forkan M. Analysis of Helicobacter pylori prevalence
in Chittagong, Bangladesh, based on PCR and CLO test. Microbiol Insights.
2016; 9: 47-50. doi:10.4137/MBI.S39858.
13.&amp;nbsp; Rhaman MM, Rahman F, Mazumder S, Sayeed MA, Haq JA. Helicobacter pylori infection in
asymptomatic rural Bangladeshi population. IMC J Med Sci. 2021; 15(1): 41-6. doi:10.3329/imcjms.v15i1.54201.
14.&amp;nbsp; Lin SK, Lambert JR, Schembri
MA, Nicholson L, Korman MG. Helicobacter pylori
prevalence in endoscopy and medical staff. J Gastroen Hepatol.
1994; 9(4): 319-324.
doi:10.1111/j.1440-1746.1994.tb01249.x.
15.&amp;nbsp; Mastromarino P, Conti C, Donato K, Strappini
PM, Cattaruzza MS, Orsi GB.Does hospital work constitute a risk
factor for Helicobacter pylori infection? J Hosp Infect. 2005; 60(3): 261–268. doi:&amp;nbsp;10.1016/j.jhin.2004.12.019.
16.&amp;nbsp; Jahan H,
Chowdhury OA, Uddin MJ. Helicobacter
pylori infection on medical students: A study on MAG Osmani Medical
College, Bangladesh. African Journal of
Virology. 2013; 7(2): 001-005.
17.&amp;nbsp; Naser NKAA, Bashir MBM, Ali ASMA. Prevalence
and associated risk factors of Helicobacter
pylori infection among medical students at Shendi University, Sudan. BMC Gastroenterol. 2025; 25(1): 466.
doi:10.1186/s12876-025-04074-9.
18.&amp;nbsp; Ferdaus SJ, Paul SK, Nasreen SA, Haque N,
Sadekuzzaman M, Karim MR, et al. The prevalence, risk factors, and
antimicrobial resistance determinants of Helicobacter
pylori detected in dyspeptic patients in North–Central Bangladesh. Infect
Dis Rep. 2024; 16(2): 181-8. doi:10.3390/idr16020014.
19.&amp;nbsp; Tshibangu-Kabamba E, Phuc BH, Tuan VP, Fauzia
KA, Kabongo-Tshibaka A, Kayiba NK, et al. Assessment of the diagnostic accuracy
and relevance of a novel ELISA system developed for seroepidemiologic surveys
of Helicobacter pylori infection in
African settings. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2021; 15(9): e0009763. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0009763.
20.&amp;nbsp; Khurana R,
Fischbach L, Chiba N, Van Zanten SV, Sherman PM, George BA, et al.
Meta-analysis: Helicobacter pylori
eradication treatment efficacy in children. Aliment
Pharmacol Ther. 2007; 25(5): 523-536.
doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03236.x.
21.&amp;nbsp; de
Boer WA, Tytgat GN. Regular review: treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection. BMJ.
2000; 320(7226): 31-34. doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7226.31.
22.&amp;nbsp; Yi M, Chen S, Yi X, Zhang F, Zhou X, Zeng M, et
al.&amp;nbsp;Helicobacter pylori&amp;nbsp;infection process: from the molecular
world to clinical treatment. Front Microbiol. 2025; 16: 1541140. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2025.1541140.
23.&amp;nbsp; Braden
B, Duan LP, Caspary WF, Lembcke B. Endoscopy is not a risk factor for Helicobacter pylori infection--but
medical practice is. Gastrointest Endosc. 1997; 46(4): 305-310.
doi:10.1016/s0016-5107(97)70115-9.
24.&amp;nbsp; Liu
WZ, Xiao SD, Jiang SJ, Li RR, Pang ZJ. Seroprevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in medical staff in Shanghai. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1996; 31(8): 749-752. doi:10.3109/00365529609010346.
25.&amp;nbsp; Nishikawa
J, Kawai H, Takahashi A, Seki T, Yoshikawa N, Akita Y, et al. Seroprevalence of
immunoglobulin G antibodies against Helicobacter
pylori among endoscopy personnel in Japan. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;
48(3): 237-243. doi:10.1016/s0016-5107(98)70184-1.
26.&amp;nbsp; Almadi MA, Aljebreen AM, Tounesi FA, Abdo AA. Helicobacter pylori prevalence among
medical students in a high endemic area. Saudi
Med J. 2007; 28(6): 896-898.
27.&amp;nbsp; Al Ofairi BA, Saeed MK, Al-Qubaty M, Abdulkareem AM,
Al-Jahrani MA. Diagnostic value of IgG antibody and stool antigen tests for
chronic Helicobacter pylori
infections in Ibb Governorate, Yemen.&amp;nbsp;Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1): 7536. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-58165-w.
28.&amp;nbsp; Rajan C, Chiou FK, Ho CWW. Prevalence,
Management, and Outcomes of Non-invasive Helicobacter pylori testing in
children at a tertiary paediatric hospital in Singapore. Pediatr
Gastroenterol Hepatol Nutr. 2024; 27(6): 336–344. doi:10.5223/pghn.2024.27.6.336.
29.&amp;nbsp; Hussen
BM, Qader SS, Ahmed HF, Ahmed SH. Ahmed. The prevalence of Helicobacter pylori among university students in Iraq. Indian Journal of Science and Technology.
2013; 6(8): 1-5. doi:&amp;nbsp;10.17485/ijst/2013/v6i8.4.
30.&amp;nbsp; Segal
ED, Cha J, Lo J, Falkow S, Tompkins LS. Altered states: involvement of
phosphorylated CagA in the induction of host cell growth changes by Helicobacter pylori. Proc Natl Acad
Sci U S A. 1999; 96(25): 14559-14564. doi:10.1073/pnas.96.25.14559.
31.&amp;nbsp; Asahi
M, Azuma T, Ito S, Ito Y, Suto H, Nagai Y, et al. Helicobacter pyloriCagA
protein can be tyrosine phosphorylated in gastric epithelial cells. J Exp
Med. 2000; 191(4): 593-602. doi:10.1084/jem.191.4.593.
32.&amp;nbsp; Odenbreit
S, Piils J, Sedlmaier B, Gerland E, Fischer W, Haas R. Translocation of Helicobacter pyloriCagA into gastric
epithelial cells by type IV secretion. Science.
2000; 287(5457): 1497-1500. doi:10.1126/science.287.5457.1497.
33.&amp;nbsp; Stein
M, Rappuoli R, Covacci A. Tyrosine phosphorylation of the Helicobacter pyloriCagA antigen after cag-driven host cell
translocation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000; 97(3): 1263-1268.
doi:10.1073/pnas.97.3.1263.
34.&amp;nbsp; Crabtree
JE, Taylor JD, Wyatt JI, Heatley RV, Shallcross TM, Tompkins DS, et al. Mucosal
IgA recognition of Helicobacter pylori
120 kDa protein, peptic ulceration, and gastric pathology. Lancet. 1991; 338(8763):
332-335. doi:10.1016/0140-6736(91)90477-7.
35.&amp;nbsp; Peek
RM, Miller GG, Tham KT, Perez-Perez GI, Zhao X, Atherton JC, et al. Heightened
inflammatory response and cytokine expression in vivo to cagA+ Helicobacter pylori strains. Lab Invest. 1995; 73(6): 760-70.
36.&amp;nbsp; Parsonnet
J, Friedman GD, Orentreich N, Vogelman H. Risk for gastric cancer in people
with CagA positive or CagA negative Helicobacter
pylori infection. Gut. 1997; 40(3): 297-301.
doi:10.1136/gut.40.3.297.
37.&amp;nbsp; Blaser
MJ, Perez-Perez GI, Kleanthouse H, Cover T, Peek R, Chyou P, et al. Infection
with Helicobacter pylori strains
possessing cagA is associated with an increased risk of developing
adenocarcinoma of the stomach. Cancer Res.
1995; 55(10): 2111-2115.
38. Perveen I, Saha M, Hasan MQ. Is there
decreasing prevalence of Helicobacter Pyloriinfection in patients with dyspepsia? Journal of Chittagong
Medical College Teachers&#039; Association. 2022; 33(1): 97-102. doi:10.3329/jcmcta.v33i1.67265.
39.&amp;nbsp; Jenks PJ, Mégraud F, Labigne A. Clinical
outcome after infection with Helicobacter
pylori does not appear to be reliably predicted by the presence of any of
the genes of the cag pathogenicity island.&amp;nbsp;Gut. 1998; 43(6): 752-758. doi:10.1136/gut.43.6.752.
40.&amp;nbsp; Hua J, Zheng PY, Yeoh KG, Ho B. The status of
the cagA gene does not predict Helicobacter
pylori-associated peptic ulcer disease in Singapore.&amp;nbsp;Microbios.
2000; 102(402): 113-120.
41.&amp;nbsp; Yang JC, Wang TH, Wang HJ, Kuo CH, Wang JT,
Wang WC. Genetic analysis of the cytotoxin-associated gene and the vacuolating
toxin gene in Helicobacter pylori
strains isolated from Taiwanese patients. Am J Gastroenterol. 1997; 92(8):
1316-1321.
42.&amp;nbsp; Sultana A, Ahmed S, Ahmed EU, Nuruddin
Chowdhury AF, Kalam A, Rahman A et al. Stool Antigen Test is Effective and
Sensitive for Detecting Helicobacter
Pylori Infection in Bangladeshi Peptic Ulcer Patients. medRxiv. 2021: 2021-10.
43.&amp;nbsp; Ebar MH, Ahmed MO. Frequency of H. pylori Infection among Patients with
Gastrointestinal Symptoms Attending Somali Sudanese Specialized Hospital
(SSSH), Mogadishu, Somalia. Asian journal
of medicine and health. 2023; 21(8):
27-31.
&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Cite this article as:
&amp;nbsp;Akter S, Khatun R, Melan A, Rumana SN,
Khandker E, Mahmud M, et al. The prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection
among students of a medical college in Bangladesh. IMC J Med Sci. 2025;
19(2):009. DOI:https://doi.org/10.55010/imcjms.19.019</description>

            </item>
            
    <copyright>2026 Ibrahim Medical College. All rights reserved.</copyright>
</channel>
</rss>
