<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://imcjms.com/assets/rss.css" ?><rss version="2.0">
<channel>
    <title>IMC Journal of Medical Science</title>
    <link>https://imcjms.com</link>
    <description>Ibrahim Medical College Journal of Medical Science</description>

                        <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Drug resistance pattern of M. tuberculosis in category II treatment failure pulmonary tuberculosis patients]]></title>

                                    <author><![CDATA[Fahmida Rahman]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Sadia Sharmin]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Md. Mustafa Kamal]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Md. Ruhul Amin Miah]]></author>
                
                <link data-url="https://imcjms.com/registration/journal_full_text/58">
    https://imcjms.com/registration/journal_full_text/58
</link>
                <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 11:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
                <category><![CDATA[Original Article]]></category>
                <comments><![CDATA[Ibrahim Med. Coll. J. 2013; 7(1): 9-11]]></comments>
                <description>This study was designed to determine the extent of drug resistance
of M. tuberculosis (MTB) isolated from category II treatment failure
pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) patients. A total of 100 Ziehl-Neelsen (Z-N) smear
positive category II failure PTB patients were included in this study. Sputum
culture was done in Lowenstein-Jensen (L-J) media. Conventional proportion
method on Lowenstein-Jensen (L-J) media was used to determine the drug
susceptibility of M. tuberculosis to isoniazid (INH), rifampicin (RMP),
ofloxacin (OFX) and kanamycin (KA). Out of 100 sputum samples, a total of 87
samples were positive by culture. Drug susceptibility test (DST) revealed that
82 (94.25%) isolates were resistant to one or more anti -TB drugs. Resistance
to isoniazide (INH), rifampicin (RMP), ofloxacin (OFX) and kanamycin (KA) was
94.25%, 82.75%, 29.90% and 3.45% respectively. Among these isolates, 79.31% and
3.45% isolates were multi-drug resistant (MDR) and extended drug resistant
(XDR) M. tuberculosis respectively.&amp;nbsp;
High rate of anti-tubercular drug resistance
was observed among the category II treatment failure TB patients. 
Introduction
Both MDR-TB and XDR-TB are the emerging
threats to the success of tuberculosis control programs. Although treatable,
MDR-TB cases are difficult and costly. On the other hand, XDR-TB cases are
virtually untreatable since none of the standard or reserve drugs is effective.
To prevent the transmission of these strains, early identification of this type
of resistant strain is important. Such early detection could optimize
treatment, improve the outcome and prevent the transmission of MDR-TB.
&amp;nbsp;
A total of 100 Z-N smear positive category II
treatment failure pulmonary tuberculosis patients of different age and sex were
enrolled in this study. Sample collection and laboratory works were done in the
National Tuberculosis Referral Laboratory (NTRL) and National Institute of
Disease of Chest and Hospital (NIDCH), during the period of January to December
2010. Drug susceptibility was done only on culture positive isolates.
&amp;nbsp;
During the study period a total of 100 smear
positive category II treatment failure pulmonary tuberculosis patients were
enrolled. Out of the 100 patients, sputum samples from 87 (87%) were positive
by culture. All were identified as&amp;nbsp;M. tuberculosis&amp;nbsp;complex.
Out of 87 isolates, 82 (94.25%) were resistant to one or more drugs. Highest
resistant was found against isoniazid (94.25%) followed by rifampicin (82.75%),
ofloxacin (29.90%) and Kanamycin (3.45%) either alone or in combination with
other drugs (Table-1). Sixty nine (79.31%) isolates were detected as MDR while
three (3.45%) were XDR (Table-2). Ten (11.49%) isolates were detected as
resistant to only INH while no RMP mono resistant isolate was detected in the
present study. Out of 87 isolates, five were sensitive to all four drugs
tested. 
Table 1: Resistance
pattern of M. tuberculosis isolated from category II treatment failure cases
&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Discussion
Among
these culture positive isolates, 79.31% were diagnosed as MDR-TB. Previously in
2009, similar high rate of multi drug resistant M. tuberculosis (83% and
87%) was also reported in two different studies among category II failure
Bangladeshi patients.9,10&amp;nbsp;No national
study has been conducted in Bangladesh to evaluate the current status of
MDR/XDR-TB among the category II treatment failure cases. Recent national Drug
Resistance Surveillance (DRS) data recorded the rate of MDR-TB as 1.4% among
new cases and 29% among previously treated TB cases.5&amp;nbsp;Therefore,
routine bacteriological monitoring of category II failure cases is needed to
detect and isolate MDR-TB cases to prevent transmission and mortality. Out of
total 87 isolates, about 10% isolates showed resistance to ofloxacin.
Fluroqunolone is frequently used in respiratory tract as well as other types of
community acquired infections. So, irrational and frequent short course use of
fluoroquinolones for various other type infections may be restricted to prevent
the development of fluoroquinolones resistance among M. tuberculosis.&amp;nbsp; Three isolates (3.45%) were diagnosed as
XDR-TB. This high rate of XDR M. tuberculosis could be due to the fact
that our enrolled patients were category II treatment failure cases from a
tertiary care centre where difficult cases were referred from all over the
country. However, the overall prevalence of XDR-TB among all MDR-B isolates was
6.6% worldwide, 6.5% in industrialized countries, 13.6% in Russia, 1.5% in Asia
and 0.6% in Africa.7
&amp;nbsp;
1.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Gursimrat KS.
Tuberculosis current situation, challenges and overview of its control program
in India. J Glob Infect Dis 2011; 3: 143-150.
3.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Global tuberculosis
control: surveillance, planning, financing; WHO report, WHO/HTM/TB/2009.411
5.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; World Health
Organization. Tuberculosis profile 2011. Available
at : http//: www.who.int/countries/bgd/en/ 
7.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Amita J and Pratima D.
Multidrug resistance to extensively drug resistance tuberculosis: What is next?
J Biosci 2008; 33: 605-16. 
9.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Kamal SM, Shamim MD, Van
Deun et al. An Anti-Tuberculosis Drug resistance Patterns among Category
2 failure patients in Bangladesh. Chest &amp;amp; Heart Journal 2009; 33:
118-21. 
11.&amp;nbsp;  Vernon A, Burman W,
Benator D, et al. Acquired rifamycin monoresistance in patients with
HIV-related tuberculosis treated with once-weekly rifapentine and isoniazid.
Tuberculosis Trials Consortium. Lancet; 353: 1843–47.
</description>

            </item>
            
    <copyright>2026 Ibrahim Medical College. All rights reserved.</copyright>
</channel>
</rss>
