<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://imcjms.com/assets/rss.css" ?><rss version="2.0">
<channel>
    <title>IMC Journal of Medical Science</title>
    <link>https://imcjms.com</link>
    <description>Ibrahim Medical College Journal of Medical Science</description>

                        <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Underutrition and Adiposity in Children and Adolescents: A Nutrition Paradox in Bangladesh]]></title>

                                    <author><![CDATA[M. Abu Sayeed]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Mir Masudur Rhaman]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Akhter Banu]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Hajera Mahtab]]></author>
                
                <link data-url="https://imcjms.com/registration/journal_full_text/48">
    https://imcjms.com/registration/journal_full_text/48
</link>
                <pubDate>Tue, 02 Aug 2016 10:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
                <category><![CDATA[Original Article]]></category>
                <comments><![CDATA[Ibrahim Med. Coll. J. 2012; 6(1): 1-8]]></comments>
                <description>Many
studies reported a high prevalence of undernutrition in the under-5 children in
Bangladesh. But very few information are available about undernutrition and
adiposity among school children and adolescents in Bangladesh. This study
addressed the prevalence of undernutrition and obesity among school going
children and adolescents. A total of 15 secondary schools were purposively
selected from rural, suburban and urban areas. The teachers were detailed about
the study protocol. Then the teachers volunteered to register the eligible (age
10 – 18y) students for the study. Each student’s parent was interviewed for
family income. Height (ht), weight (wt), mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC) and
blood pressure were taken. Fasting blood samples were collected for fasting
plasma glucose, total cholesterol (Chol), triglycerides (TG), high-density lipoproteins
(HDL). Body mass index (BMI) was calculated (ht/wt in met. sq) for diagnosis of
undernutrition (BMI &amp;lt;18.5), normal weight (BMI 18.5 – 22.9) overweight (BMI
23.0 – 25.0) and obesity (BMI &amp;gt;25.0). A total of 2151 (m-1063, f-1088)
students volunteered the study. Of them, the poor, middle and rich social
classes were 25.4, 53.1 and 21.5%, respectively. Overall, the prevalence of
underweight, normal, overweight and obesity were 57.4%, 35.0%, 4.9% and 2.7%,
respectively. For gender comparison, there has been no significant difference
of BMI between boys and girls. By social class, the prevalence of underweight
was significantly higher in the poor than in the rich (62.2% v. 43.6%) and
obesity was higher in the rich than in the poor (6.1% v. 1.2%) [for both,
p&amp;lt;0.001]. Logistic regression showed that the participants from urban (OR
1.51, 95% CI 1.03 – 2.22) and the rich (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.24 – 3.33) social
class had excess risk for obesity. The risk for undernutrition was found just
reverse. Undernutrition was found most prevalent among the rural students and
among the poor social class; whereas, prevalence of overweight and obesity
appears to be increasing with urbanization and increasing family income. Thus,
the study showed a nutrition paradox – adiposity in the midst of many
undernourished children and adolescents in Bangladesh. Further study may be
undertaken in a large scale to establish diagnostic criteria for age specific
nutrition assessment in Bangladesh. A prospective children cohort may help assessing
the cut-offs for unhealthy sequels of undernutrition and adiposity.
Address for Correspondence:Dr MA Sayeed, Professor &amp;amp; Head,
Department of Community Medicine, Ibrahim Medical College, 122 Kazi Nazrul
Islam Avenue, Dhaka 1000. Email: sayeed1950@gmail.com
&amp;nbsp;
Bangladesh
is a least developing country and more than one-third of its children are
exposed to undernutrition. Undernutrition is also common among the pregnant
mothers. Low birth weight was reported to be 36%.1&amp;nbsp;Thus, these Bangladeshi
children experience nutritional deficiency from birth. The prevalence of
moderate to severe malnutrition in children (Gomez Classification) was reported
to be the same (~36%). The prevalence rates of underweight (weight for age,
&amp;lt;2SD), stunting (height for age, &amp;lt;2SD) and wasting (weight for height,
&amp;lt;2SD) in children of age 6-71 months were 51.1, 48.8 and 11.7%,
respectively.1&amp;nbsp;These
figures indicate that majority of the children are exposed to undernutrition.
Such undernutrition at early life leads to some metabolic disorders in
adulthood.2,3&amp;nbsp;This
has also been reported in other developing communities.4-6&amp;nbsp;Interestingly, some observed
that the combination of underweight and overweight in children coexist in the
same community or even in the same family.7&amp;nbsp;This is dubbed as the “dual
burden household”. It is postulated that a relatively new phenomenon is
emerging in the developing countries. It leads to the nutrition transition
along with socioeconomic and demographic transition resulting changes in diet,
food availability and lifestyle. In Bangladesh too, possibly due to such
socio-economic transition and changes in lifestyle, undernutrition and adiposity
coexist. This appears to be a nutrition paradox. An awesome undernutrition is
now added with obesity– an emerging health problem in children. So far, most of
the studies conducted in Bangladesh addressed ‘undernutrition in children of
age below 71 months’. There has been very few information about childhood
nutrition beyond this age group. This study addresses the overall nutritional
status among children and adolescents in Bangladesh. Additionally, the study
attempts to assess the socio-demographic and socio-economic risks related to
both undernutrition and obesity.
Subjects and Methods
Purposively,
we selected secondary schools. The schools from rural, suburban and urban were
8, 2 and 5, respectively. All students of age group 10 to 18 years were
considered eligible and enlisted in each school. An attempt was made to
maintain population proportion of geographical sites (rural, urban and
suburban)1&amp;nbsp;with an
equal ratio of male and female participants. We discussed the objectives and
investigation procedures with the teachers. We sought help from the teaching
staff and the students to prepare the list of participants. They gave their
assent and prepared the list of eligible participants. At registration, each
student was advised to attend the school at 8AM with an overnight fast
accompanied by a parent. The parents were interviewed about annual family
income in order to classify social class according to income tertile (poor,
middle and rich). 
As
regards nutritional status, we estimated underweight, normal weight, overweight
and obesity with corresponding BMI &amp;lt;18.5, 18.5 – 22.9, 23 – 25 and &amp;gt;25.0
kg/m2, respectively.8,9&amp;nbsp;We used the term adiposity
(overweight and obesity) when BMI was found greater than 22.9.
Data analysis
&amp;nbsp;
A total
of 2151 (m-1063, f-1088) students volunteered the study (table-1). The
participants from rural, suburban and urban were 800, 402 and 949,
respectively. Of them, (53%) were from social middle and 25.5% from social poor
class (table-1).
For age
tertile in table-2, mostly, the mean (SD) values for ht, wt, BMI, MUAC, SBP,
DBP and TG were found significantly higher in female than male students in the
age group 10 – 12y (tertile1); but, with the advancing age these were reversed
and found significantly higher in males (15 – 18y, tertile3). FPG, Chol and HDL
showed some differences but were inconsistent.
Comparison
between rural and urban showed that BMI (18.7 v. 18.2, p&amp;lt;0.01) and MUAC
(22.1 v. 20.0, p&amp;lt;0.001) of both sexes (m + F) were significantly higher in
the rural than urban [data not shown]. On the contrary, DBP (61 v.58 mmHg,
p&amp;lt;0.001), FPG (4.9 v. 4.4 mmol/l, p&amp;lt;0.001), T-cholesterol (157 v. 148
mg/dl, p&amp;lt;0.001) and HDL-cholesterol (52.3 v. 39.1 mg/dl, p&amp;lt;0.001) of both
sexes were found significantly higher in urban than the rural participants [not
shown in table]. It may be noted that height, weight, SBP and TG of both sexes
did not differ between rural and urban. 
The
prevalence of underweight and adiposity (overweight and obesity) by social
class were presented in table 5. Overall, the prevalence of underweight
(BMI=&amp;lt;18.5) was 57.4% and adiposity (overweight + obesity) was 7.6%. The
prevalence of adiposity was found mostly in the middle and rich class, and
underweight was most prevalent in the middle and the poor class. Thus, middle
class was found to have undernutrition (32.2%) and adiposity (3.7%). Obviously,
nutrition status was found related to the gradient across social class –
undernutrition among the poor and overweight or obesity among the rich (Chi sq
6.8, p&amp;lt;0.001).
If we
accept 15th, 85th&amp;nbsp;and 95th&amp;nbsp;percentile of BMI as underweight, overweight
and obesity then BMI cut-offs of these participants would be 15.6, 21.4 and
24.0, respectively.
Logistic regression was also used to quantify the predictors of
undernutrition taking BMI &amp;lt;18.5 as a dependent variable (data not shown).
The poor social class and the rural area were found to be the independent risks
for underweight.
Table-1: Distribution of student participants
according to sex, area and social class.
&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Table 3: Comparison of biophysical characteristics
between male and female participants according to geographical sites.
&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Table 5: Distribution of underweight and adiposity
according to social class
&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Discussion
The
study has several limitations. Firstly, central obesity (waist/hip) and
skin-fold thickness were not taken. So, fat patterning of this age group could
not be assessed. Secondly, assessment of dietary intake and physical activity
were not included in the study. These information could have improved the
study.
Very
similar study was reported from south Korea that the percentiles for
underweight, overweight, and obesity corresponding to BMI of 18.5, 23.0, and
25.0 kg/m2&amp;nbsp;at age
18 were the 13.0th percentile, the 77.8th percentile, and the 91.2nd
percentile, respectively.10&amp;nbsp;The corresponding prevalence of underweight,
overweight, and obesity were 12.1, 12.5, and 9.8%, respectively. So, large
proportions (57.5%) of our children were underweight as compared with the Sri
Lankan and Korean children.9,10
&amp;nbsp;
We
conclude that the prevalence of underweight among children and adolescent still
remains high and related mainly to poor and partly to middle socio-economic
class irrespective of geographical sites. The prevalence of adiposity (overweight
and obesity) appears to be high among the rich, moderate among the middle and
very low among the poor social class. The urban students of both sexes have
excess risk for overweight and obesity. Thus, the children and adolescent of
Bangladesh showed a nutrition paradox – adiposity coexists with prevalent
undernutrition. Further study may be undertaken to determine nutritional status
in relation with dietary intake, physical activity and fat distribution.
Finally and importantly, we need to define underweight, overweight and obesity
for Bangladeshi population for specific age groups.
Acknowledgements
&amp;nbsp;
1.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Bangladesh Bureau of
Statistics. Statistical Pocket Book of Bangladesh. Ed: Mollah MSA, Statistical
Division, Ministry of Planning, Government of The People’s Republic of Bangladesh
2009.
3.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; G.E. Miller, E. Chen,
A.K. Fok, H. Walker, A. Lim, E.F. Nicholls, S. Cole, M.S. Kobor. Low early-life
social class leaves a biological residue manifested by decreased glucocorticoid
and increased proinflammatory signaling. Proceedings of the National Academy
of Sciences 2009; 106(34): 14716-14721.
5.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Popkin BM, Richards MK,
Monteiro CA. Stunting is associated with overweight in children of four nations
that are undergoing the nutrition transition. J Nutr 1996; 126:
3009–16.
7.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Benjamin Caballero. A
Nutrition Paradox — Underweight and Obesity in Developing Countries. N Engl
J Med 2005; 352: 1514-1516.
9.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Wickramasinghe VP,
Lamabadusuriya SP, Atapattu N, Sathyadas G, Kuruparanantha S, Karunarathne P.
Nutritional status of schoolchildren in an urban area of Sri Lanka. Ceylon
Med J 2004; 49(4): 114-8.
11.Thorpe LE, List DG, Marx
T, May L, Helgerson SD, Frieden TR. Childhood obesity in New York City
elementary school students. Am J Public Heath 2004; 94(9):
1496-500.
</description>

            </item>
            
    <copyright>2026 Ibrahim Medical College. All rights reserved.</copyright>
</channel>
</rss>
