<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://imcjms.com/assets/rss.css" ?><rss version="2.0">
<channel>
    <title>IMC Journal of Medical Science</title>
    <link>https://imcjms.com</link>
    <description>Ibrahim Medical College Journal of Medical Science</description>

                        <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Do obesity, hypertension and dyslipidemia pose
significant risks for coronary artery disease among Bangladeshi diabetics?]]></title>

                                    <author><![CDATA[Akhter Banu]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Fazlul Hoque]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Khandoker Abul Ahsan]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[M Abu Sayeed]]></author>
                
                <link data-url="https://imcjms.com/registration/journal_full_text/426">
    https://imcjms.com/registration/journal_full_text/426
</link>
                <pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2022 13:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
                <category><![CDATA[Original Article]]></category>
                <comments><![CDATA[IMC J Med Sci. 2023; 17(1): 002]]></comments>
                <description>Abstract
Background and objectives:
For decades the global population has been experiencing diabetic epidemic. The
risks related to obesity, diabetes mellitus (DM) and coronary artery diseases
(CAD) are well known. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of coronary
artery disease (CAD) and its related risks in Bangladeshi diabetics. 
Materials and methods:
The study was conducted at Bangladesh Institute of Research and Rehabilitation
in Diabetes, Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders (BIRDEM), a largest referral
center for diabetes in Bangladesh. Socio-demographic and clinical history
including biochemical investigation report were collected from the BIRDEM
registry. The eligible criteria of study participants were: age 30 – 60 year, having
DM, non-smoker, free from retinopathy, nephropathy and neuropathy. The
prevalence of CAD, systolic hypertension (SHTN) and diastolic hypertension (DHTN)
in the registered diabetic patients were estimated. Additionally, the study
addressed the risk and predictors of CAD among those with DM.
Investigations included – anthropometry,
blood pressure, blood glucose, serum lipids and electrocardiogram (ECG). CAD
was diagnosed on: (a) history of angina plus positive ECG - either on rest or
on stress, post-myocardial infarction (MI) with Q-wave MI or non-Q-MI or
echocardiographic evidences. Lipids namely triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol
(T-Chol), high density lipoproteins (HDL) and low-density lipoproteins (LDL)
were estimated by Hitachi-704 auto-analyzer using enzymatic method. 
Results:
A total of 693 (M /W =295/398) participants volunteered. The prevalence of CAD,
SHTN, DHTN and mean arterial hypertension (MAH) were 18.6%, 23.2%, 13.6% and
17.7%, respectively. Their mean (±SD) values of age, body mass index (BMI - kg/m2), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), waist-to-height
ratio (WHtR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were 47 (8.6) years, 24.6 (3.5),
0.98(0.05), 0.56(0.06) and 101(11.3) mmHg, respectively. The mean (±SD) of FBG
(mmol/L), T-Chol, TG and HDL (mg/dl) were 10.2 ± 4.0, 206 ± 44, 218 ± 86 and 47.5
± 9.3 respectively. The women had significantly higher BMI (p&amp;lt;0.001), WHtR
(p&amp;lt;0.001), SBP (&amp;lt;0.001), MAP (p&amp;lt;0.001), T-Chol (p&amp;lt;0.001) and TG
(p=0.043) than men. The risk variables were categorized into quartiles and
Chi-sq trend determined whether the increasing prevalence of CAD were significant.
Higher quartile of age was found consistently significant (p&amp;lt;0.001). Of the
obesity indices, only higher quartile of WHtR was significant (p&amp;lt; 0.05). For
BP measures, higher MAP quartiles showed the trend significant (p&amp;lt;0.001). Likewise,
for lipids, higher quartiles of TG (p&amp;lt;0.001) and lower quartile of HDL
(p&amp;lt;0.001) were significant.
Finally, logistic regression estimated
the risk related to CAD. The highest age-quintile (&amp;gt;55y: 95% CI: 1.09 - 43.7)
and highest TG-quintile (281mg/dl: 95% CI: 1.45-59.7) were proved to be
significant predictor of CAD and HDL highest quintile (&amp;gt;54mg/dl) was proved
to be significant protecting factor for CAD (95% CI: 0.005-0.583).
Conclusion:
The study observed the importance of MAP, TG, HDL, T-Chol/HDLR (T-Chol -to HDL
ratio) and TG/HDLR (triglycerides-to HDL ratio) as risks for CAD among
diabetics. Further study with investigations of echocardiogram, ETT, coronary
angiogram and coronary calcium scoring would be helpful in confirming these
findings related to CAD risks.
IMC J Med Sci. 2023; 17(1): 002.&amp;nbsp; DOI: https://doi.org/10.55010/imcjms.17.002
*Correspondence:M Abu Sayeed, Department
of Community Medicine, Ibrahim Medical College, 1/A, Ibrahim Sarani,
Segunbagicha, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh. Email: sayeed1950@gmail.com
&amp;nbsp;
Introduction
According to World Health Organization
(WHO) cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are&amp;nbsp;the leading cause of death,
taking approximately&amp;nbsp;18 million lives annually globally [1]. There have
been many newer published reports highlighting high arterial pressure and
dyslipidemia as important risk for coronary artery disease (CAD) [2,3]. Four
out of five CVD deaths are due to heart attacks and strokes [1]. One third of
these deaths occur prematurely below (&amp;lt;70y). Several
risk factors are shared between Type2 diabetes (T2D) and CAD, including
obesity, insulin resistance and dyslipidemia [4,5]. CAD can precede type 2
diabetes (T2D), which is a major risk factor for CVD [6]. It may be recalled
that 1in 10 adults of the world are now living with diabetes [7]. For
Bangladeshi diabetic population the findings of coronary risks were reported
mainly on age, sex, geographical site, occupation, obesity, hypertension, and
glycemic control [8]. This study revisited the published report comparing the
risk of CAD related to obesity, elevated mean arterial hypertension and
dyslipidemia. It also showed the effect of high total cholesterol (T-Chol), high
triglyceride (TG) and low high-density lipoprotein (HDL) on CAD separately.
Additionally, it demonstrated the effect of T-Chol-to-HDL ration (T-Chol/ HDLR)
and TG-to-HDL ratio (TG/HDLR) on CAD.
&amp;nbsp;
Materials
and methods
Study design:
Subjects and methods have been detailed in the previous published report [8].
Briefly the selection procedure is elaborated in the Figure-1. The duration of
diabetes (mean ±S.D.) was 13.6 ± 3.6 (range 2–18) months. Informed consent was
taken and they were interviewed for the clinical history related to initial
investigations and diagnosis, smoking habits, family history of diabetes, HTN
and atherosclerotic cardiovascular events and their drug history (if any). They
were also interviewed for past illness about HTN and CAD followed by general
and systemic examination.
&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Figure-1: Selection of study participants from
the BIRDEM diabetes registry. CAD-coronary artery disease; SHTN-systolic
hypertension; DHTN-diastolic hypertension; MAH-mean arterial hypertension (MAP
&amp;gt;110mmHg)
&amp;nbsp;
Then, based on clinical findings,
relevant investigations were undertaken in BIRDEM for confirmation ofthe
diagnosis. The subjects with secondary HTN, cerebrovascular stroke, foot ulcer,
nephropathy and retinopathy were excluded from the study. Those who were using
corticosteroid and contraceptive pills were also excluded.
Anthropometric assessment included
body mass index (BMI), waist-to-hip ration (WHR) and waist-to-height ration
(WHtR). Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was estimated as (MAP = dbp + 1/3(sbp –
dbp) [9]. For this study elevated (&amp;gt;110mmHg) MAP was considered. Systolic (SHTN)
and diastolic (DHTN) hypertension were taken as SBP ≥140 and DBP ≥90 mmHg,
respectively. Hypertensive subjects previously diagnosed were also included.
Their BP was taken 2 days after cessation of anti-hypertensive drugs. World
Health Organization (WHO) diagnostic criteria were used to diagnose diabetes mellitus.
The measurements of plasma glucose
were done by glucose-oxydase peroxydase method using Technicon M-II
autoanalyzer. All subjects underwent ECG-tracing except those with recent ECG
reports. The diagnosis of CAD was based on: (a) history of angina plus positive
ECG either on rest or on stress, post-myocardial infarction (MI) with Q-wave MI
or non-Q-MI in echocardigraphic evidences. Lipids (TG, Chol, HDL, LDL) were
estimated by Hitachi-704 auto-analyzer using enzymatic method. LDL-cholesterol
(LDL) was measured using formula: LDL-C = 0.9
TC- (0.9 TG/5)-28 [18].
Statistical analysis: The prevalence
rates (qualitative variables) were given in percentages. The quantitative
variables were presented in means with standard deviation (SD). The comparisons
between groups were estimated by unpaired t-test. The associations between
anthropometrics and lipid fractions were estimated by Pearson’s correlations
co-efficient. The prevalence trends (increasing / decreasing) were estimated by
Chi-sq. Binary logistic regression analysis showed the effects of independent
variables (obesity, blood pressure, lipids) on the dependent variables CAD. The
significance levels of all statistical tests were taken at 0.05. 
&amp;nbsp;
Results
A total of 693 (M=295, F=398)
registered diabetic patients of age 30 – 60 year volunteered the study (Figure1).
The prevalence of CAD was 18.6% (men vs. women = 16.6 vs. 20.2%; p = 0.139). The
prevalence of systolic hypertension (SHTN) was 23.2% (men vs. women = 19.3 vs.
26.1%, p&amp;lt;0.05) and prevalence of diastolic hypertension (DHTN) was 13.6%
(men vs. women = 11.2 vs. 15.3%, p =0.07). The prevalence of mean arterial
hypertension (MAH) was 17.7% (men vs. women = 14.9 vs. 19.8, p = 0.058).
The biophysical characteristics of all
participants were shown in Table-1a. The comparisons of these characteristics
between men and women were shown in Table-1b. The comparison between
age-matched 295 men and 398 women showed that the women had significantly
higher BMI (p&amp;lt;0.001), WHtR (p&amp;lt;0.001), SBP (p&amp;lt;0.001), MAP (p = 0.002), T-Chol
(p&amp;lt;0.001) and TG (p&amp;lt;0.05) than their male counterpart. Thus, most of the
obesity and blood pressure related variables were higher in women than men,
except WHR, which was significantly higher (p&amp;lt;0.001) in men.
&amp;nbsp;
Table-1a:
Biophysical characteristics of the total
participants 
&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Table-1b: Comparison
of biophysical characteristics between men and women 
&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
The Pearson’s correlation test,
controlling age and sex, was used to determine the associations between obesity
related variables (BMI, WHR, WHtR) and lipid fractions (T-Chol, TG, HDL, LDL) [Table-2].
Significant correlations of lipid-fractions were neither found with general
(BMI) nor with central obesity (WHR, WHtR). The correlations of lipid fractions
with BP measures (SBP, DBP and MAP) were shown in Table-3. Of the lipids, TG
showed significant positive and HDL significant negative correlations with all
BP measures though these correlations with T-Chol and LDL were not significant.
&amp;nbsp;
Table-2:
Correlations (controlling for age and
sex) between obesity and lipids related variables 
&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Table-3: Correlations of lipid related variables (T-Chol, TG, HDL, LDL)
with SBP, DBP and MAP (controlling for age and sex).
&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Table-4 depicted correlations
(controlling for age and sex) between blood pressure and metabolic variables (T-Chol,
TG, HDL, LDL, FBG). All BP measures (SBP, DBP and MAP) correlated significantly
with T-Chol/HDLR and TG/HDLR, but not with FBG.
&amp;nbsp;
Table-4:
Correlations of BP measures with
metabolic variables like ratios of lipid fractions (CHOL/HDLR, TG/HDLR) and FBG.
&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Whether the prevalence of CAD was
related to advancing age, increasing mean arterial pressure (MAP), TG and
decreasing with increasing HDL level are shown in Figure-2. The prevalence of
CAD according to quartiles of age, MAP, TG and HDL were estimated by chi-sq trend
with level of significance (chi-sq, p).
The trends were significant for the quartiles of age (33.6, &amp;lt;0.001), (MAP:
75.7, p&amp;lt;0.0001), TG (23.5, &amp;lt;0.001). As expected, HDL had inverse
association with CAD prevalence (20.2, &amp;lt;0.001), which indicated that low HDL
level had higher risk of developing CAD. 
&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Figure-2:Prevalence
(%) of CAD according to quartiles (Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4) of age, MAP, TG and HDL.
Age (y): Q1&amp;lt;40, Q2 41- 47, Q3 48-55,
Q4 &amp;gt;55; HDL mg /dl: Q1 &amp;lt;41, Q2 41-48, Q3&amp;nbsp;
48-53, Q4 &amp;gt;53; MAP mmHg: Q1 &amp;lt;93, Q2 94-100, Q3 101- 106, Q4
&amp;gt;106.
&amp;nbsp;
The trend of
CAD prevalence according to the quartiles of TG, HDL, T-Chol/HDLR and TG/HDLR are
shown in Figure-3 for comparison. Very high prevalence of CAD was found in the
highest quartile of TG and lowest quartile of HDL (for both, p&amp;lt;0.001). Importantly,
the increasing quartiles of T-Chol / HDL ratio and TG / HDL ratio showed
significant increasing trend of CAD prevalence. The trend of CAD prevalence
with increasing obesity (quartiles of BMI, WHR, WHtR) is shown in Figure-4. The
trends were not significant for BMI and WHR. The highest quartile of WHtR (Q4
&amp;gt;0.6) was found significant (p = 0.02).
&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Figure-3: Prevalence
(%) of CAD according to quartiles (Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4) of TG, HDL, T-Chol / HDL ratio and TG / HDL ratio. The trends were significant (chi Sq, P)
for increasing quartiles of TG (23.5, &amp;lt;0.001) and decreasing HDL (20.2,
&amp;lt;0.001), T-Chol/HDL ratio (30.7&amp;lt;0.001) and TG/HDL ratio (30.7,
&amp;lt;0.001). Quartile values of TG, mg / dl: Q1 &amp;lt;153, Q2 154 - 201, Q3 202 -
280, Q4 &amp;gt;280; Quartile values of HDL mg / dl: Q1 &amp;lt;41, Q2 41 - 48, Q3 48 -
53, Q4 &amp;gt;53; Quartile values of TG/HDL; Q1 &amp;lt;3.03, Q2 3.04 - 4.23, Q3 4.24
- 6.77, Q4 &amp;gt;6.77; and Quartile values of T-Chol/HDL ratio: Q1 &amp;lt;3.75, Q2
3.76-4.83, Q3 4.84-5.63 and Q4 &amp;gt;5.63. * Values for HDL, cholesterol and TG,
and ratios were estimated in mg/dL.
&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Figure-4: Prevalence
(%) of CAD according to quartiles (Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4) of BMI, WHR and WHtR.. Quartile values of BMI: Q1 &amp;lt;22.2,
Q2 22.3 - 24.3, Q3 24.4 - 26.5, Q4 &amp;gt;26.5; Quartile values of WHR: Q1
&amp;lt;0.95, Q2 0.96 - 0.98, Q3 0.99 -1.01, Q4 &amp;gt;1.01; Quartile values of WHtR
Q1 &amp;lt;0.52, Q2 0.53 - 0.55, Q3 0.56 - 0.6, Q4 &amp;gt;0.6.
&amp;nbsp;
Some inconsistent findings emerged
when we tried to determine the risks related to CAD among the our diabetic study
population. The investigated variables were age, sex, sites (urban/rural), family
history of NCDs, obesity, blood pressures and lipids. Of these risk factors,
which were more significant remained unclear.
We used binary logistic regression taking
the risk factors as independent and CAD as dependent variable. Of the independent
variables (sex, area, age, BMI, WHR, WHtR) only higher age quartile (Q3 and Q4)
was proved to be a significant risk for CAD [Table-5]. In Table-6, the
independent variables were sex, age and lipid fractions. The highest quartile
of age and TG, and the lowest quartile of HDL were found significant risk for
CAD.
&amp;nbsp;
Table-5:
Binary logistic regression taking
coronary artery disease (no =0, yes =1) as a dependent variable; and sex, area,
age, BMI, WHR, WHtR as independent variables. The categorical variables are
depicted below
&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Table-6:
Binary logistic regression taking
coronary artery disease (no =0, yes =1) as a dependent variable and sex, age,
cholesterol, TG, HDL as independent variables. The categorical variables are
depicted below.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 
&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Discussions
The study was conducted on purposively
selected registered diabetic patients of a referral center, BIRDEM. The
prevalence of CAD was 18.6% [Figure-1], which was more or less consistent with
the findings of the systemic review report published earlier [9]. In the
review, 21.2% had coronary heart disease (42
articles, N = 3,833,200). Higher prevalence of cardiovascular disease in
patients with type 2 DM was 37.4% (95% CI: 31.4-43.8) in Iran [10]. Another study
from Bangladesh reported the prevalence of CAD as 17.2% [11]. The study found
that it had no significant difference between gender and CAD. The present study
observed higher prevalence of CAD in women than men (20.2% vs. 16.6 %) though
not significant.
Interestingly, the age matched women
had significantly higher BMI (p&amp;lt;0.001), WHtR (p&amp;lt;0.001), SBP (p&amp;lt;0.001),
MAP (p = 0.002), T-Chol (p&amp;lt;0.001) and TG (p&amp;lt;0.05) than men. Only, WHR was
significantly higher in men than women (p&amp;lt;0.001). 
The measures of obesity (BMI, WHtR),
blood pressure (SBP, DBP, MAP) and TG were higher in women than men and consistent
with the higher prevalence of CAD in women, though the difference was not
significant. Most of the cited studies reported higher CAD prevalence in men
than women [5,7,10,11]. This contradictory finding could have been explained if
in the study there were equal numbers of female participants from rural
population. The BIRDEM diabetes registry revealed that more than 30% of women were
occupationally urban housewives and they lack physical activity resulting
obesity with dyslipidemia.
The associations between variables of obesity
and lipids (Table-2), and lipids and blood pressures (Table-3) revealed that none
of lipid fractions correlated with obesity significantly. Of the lipid
fractions, TG and HDL (and not T-Chol and LDL) showed very significant
association with SBP, DBP and MAP. This indicated that T-Chol and LDL were not
related to blood pressure. These findings could not be compared with any
published data that studied lipid fractions separately in relation to SBP, DBP
and MAP. Anika et al showed significant
correlation between total cholesterol and systolic blood pressure, also between
triglyceride and diastolic blood pressure [12]. Other studies found total cholesterol was positively associated with IHD
mortality in both middle and old age [13,14]. 
Interestingly, this study revealed that
T-Chol/HDLR and TG/HDLR correlated with all types of BP measures (Table-4 and Figure-3).
This observation is very much consistent with other Bangladeshi report [15]. Of
the obesity indices only WHtR proved to have significant risk at Q4 (&amp;gt;0.6).
This study proved WHtR to be a better obesity index for CAD. The highest quartile
of mean arterial pressure (MAP &amp;gt;106mmHg) was found to be a significant risk
for CAD. The importance of MAP was also emphasized by Gao et al [2]. The study showed the
importance of T-Chol/HDLR and TG/HDLR for predicting CAD in diabetic population.
This observation is very much consistent with the findings of other studies.
[15-17].
The study had some limitations.
Firstly, glycemic control could not be monitored for the follow-up period after
registration. Secondly, the number of women was not proportionate to the
geographical sites (urban/rural). Thirdly, physical activity of the study
participants could not be graded. Lastly, the diagnosis of CAD was based on
only on ECG findings. 
&amp;nbsp;
Conclusions 
The study revealed the prevalence of
coronary artery disease (CAD), systolic hypertension and diastolic hypertension
in the registered Bangladeshi diabetic patients. It identified the risk factors
for developing CAD. Additionally, the study addressed the possible predictors
of CAD among those with DM. The study observed the importance of MAP, TG, HDL, T-Chol/HDLR
and TG/HDLR as predictors of CAD. Further study along with the investigation of
echocardiography, ETT, coronary angiogram and coronary calcium scoring would be
helpful in confirming these findings related to CAD risks. 
&amp;nbsp;
Acknowledgements
– We are grateful to those participants who actively volunteered the study. We
are also indebted to the doctors and other official staff of BIRDEM-OPD. The
BIRDEM registry office helped in obtaining the records of the newly registered
patients with the “REFERECE No” and laboratory technician with biochemical
reports. We would like to convey our gratitude to the departed souls of Dr.
Fazlul Hoque and Dr. Khandoker Abul Ahsan. We commemorate both of them for
their whole hearted cooperation to get the study complete.
&amp;nbsp;
References
1.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; World
Health Organization. (Accessed date 20 Dec 2021). Available from:&amp;nbsp;https://www.who.int/ health-topics/cardiovascular-diseases. 
2.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Gao Y, Wang Q, Li J, Zhang J, Li R, Sun L,
et al. Impact of mean arterial pressure fluctuation
on mortality in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2018; 46(12): e1167-e1174.
3.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Pires A, Sena C, Seiça C. Dyslipidemia and
cardiovascular changes in children. Curr
Opin Cardiol. 2016; 31(1): 95-100.

4.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Laakso M,
Kuusisto J. Insulin resistance and hyperglycaemia in cardiovascular disease
development. Nat Rev Endocrinol.
2014; 10(5): 293-302.
5.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Silva
LF, Vangipurapu J, Laakso M.&amp;nbsp;The
&quot;Common Soil Hypothesis&quot; revisited- risk factors for type 2 diabetes
and cardiovascular disease. Metabolites.&amp;nbsp;2021;
11(10): 691.
6.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; International
Diabetes Federation. (accessed on 20 Dec 2021). Available from:&amp;nbsp;https://www.idf.org/
7.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Pursnani S, Merchant M. South Asian ethnicity
as a risk factor for coronary heart disease. Atherosclerosis.&amp;nbsp;2020; 315:
126-130.
8.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Sayeed
MA, Banu A, Malek MA, Khan AKA. Blood pressure and coronary heart
disease in NIDDM subjects at diagnosis: prevalence and risks in a Bangladeshi
population. Diab Res Clin Pract.
1998; 39: 147-155. 
9.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Einarson TR, Acs
A, Ludwig C, Panton UH. Prevalence of cardiovascular disease in type 2
diabetes: a systematic literature review of scientific evidence from across the
world in 2007–2017.&amp;nbsp;Cardiovasc Diabetol.&amp;nbsp;2018; 17(1):
1-9.
10.&amp;nbsp; Kazeminia
M, Salari N, Mohammadi M. Prevalence of cardiovascular disease in patients with
type 2 diabetes mellitus in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Diabetes Res.&amp;nbsp;2020; 2020.&amp;nbsp;
11.&amp;nbsp; Hanif AAM, Hasan M,
Khan MSA, Hossain MM, Shamim AA, Hossaine M, et al. Ten-years cardiovascular
risk among Bangladeshi population using non-laboratory-based risk chart of the
World Health Organization: findings from a nationally representative survey. PLoS One. 2021; 16(5): e0251967.
12.&amp;nbsp; Anika UL,
Pintaningrum Y, Syamsun A. Correlation between serum lipid profile and blood
pressure in NTB general hospital. J
Hypertens. 2015; 33: e32.
13.&amp;nbsp; Wong ND, Lopez VA,
Roberts CS, Solomon HA, Burke GL, Kuller L, et al. Combined association of
lipids and blood pressure in relation to incident cardiovascular disease in the
elderly: the cardiovascular health study. Am J Hypertens; 2010; 23(2): 161–167.
14.&amp;nbsp; Prospective Studies
Collaboration, Lewington S, Whitlock G, Clarke R, Sherliker P, Emberson J, et
al. Blood cholesterol and vascular mortality by age, sex, and blood pressure: a
meta-analysis of individual data from 61 prospective studies with 55,000
vascular deaths. Lancet. 2007; 370(9602): 1829-1839.
15.&amp;nbsp; Amin MR, Rahman MA,
Alam N, Hasan MN, Hasan GS. Relationship between triglyceride HDL-cholesterol
ratio and severity of coronary artery disease in patient with acute coronary
syndrome. Bangladesh Med J. 2014; 43(3): 157–161. 
16.&amp;nbsp; Calling S,
Johansson SE, Wolff M, Sundquist J, Sundquist K. Total cholesterol/HDL-C ratio
versus non-HDL-C as predictors for ischemic heart disease: a 17-year follow-up
study of women in southern Sweden. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021; 21(1):&amp;nbsp;1-9.
17.&amp;nbsp; Holman RR, Coleman
RL, Shine BS, Stevens RJ. Non-HDL cholesterol is less informative than the
total-to-HDL cholesterol ratio in predicting cardiovascular risk in type 2
diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005; 28(7): 1796–1797.
18.&amp;nbsp; Anandaraja S,
Narang R, Godeswar R, Laksmy R, Talwar KK. Low density lipoprotein cholesterol
estimation by a new formula in Indian population. Int
J Cardiol. 2005; 102(1): 117–120.
&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Cite this article as:
Banu
A, Hoque F, Ahsan KA, Sayeed MA. Do obesity, hypertension and
dyslipidemia pose significant risks for coronary artery disease among
Bangladeshi diabetics? IMC J Med Sci. 2023; 17(1): 002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55010/imcjms.17.002</description>

            </item>
            
    <copyright>2026 Ibrahim Medical College. All rights reserved.</copyright>
</channel>
</rss>
