<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://imcjms.com/assets/rss.css" ?><rss version="2.0">
<channel>
    <title>IMC Journal of Medical Science</title>
    <link>https://imcjms.com</link>
    <description>Ibrahim Medical College Journal of Medical Science</description>

                        <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Views
of emergency medicine congress participants&#039; on congress presentations]]></title>

                                    <author><![CDATA[Mustafa Boğan]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Mustafa sabak]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Mehmet Karadağ]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Fatma Boğan]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Hasan Gümüşboğa]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Mehmet Murat Oktay]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Behçet Al]]></author>
                
                <link data-url="https://imcjms.com/registration/journal_full_text/376">
    https://imcjms.com/registration/journal_full_text/376
</link>
                <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2021 04:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
                <category><![CDATA[Original Article]]></category>
                <comments><![CDATA[IMC J Med Sci 2021; 15(2): 007]]></comments>
                <description>Abstract
Background and objectives: Science congresses have begun to be recognized as a
tourism model that named as congress tourism. The hotels where the National
Emergency Medicine Congresses are hosted, which are held once a year,
contribute to congress tourism.The aim of this study is to find out views of
attendees of emergency medicine congresses about the congress and
presentations.
Methods: A survey form consisting of 16 questions (without
demographic question) was shared with participants attending the 14th National
Emergency Medicine Congress of the Association of Emergency Medicine
Specialists (EPAT) by SMS, e-mail, and social media messenger programs
(WhatsApp, etc.).
Results: A total of 238 participants took part in the study
of whcih73.9% (n = 176) were male. The age of the majority (68, 28.6%)
participants was between 35 to 39 years. Maximum participants (n = 95, 39.9%) were
specialist titleholders and the majority&#039;s (n = 81, 34.0%) length of service
was 6-10 years. Of the total particinats, 73.1% and
65% expressed that curiosity about the scientific content and refreshing the
knowledge respectively were the reasons for attending the conferences. 
Conclusion: Even if congresses are held in holiday hotels,
participants are more interested in scientific content. Paramedical activities
and visuals used in presentations are viewed positively. Although there are
very intense programs in the congress, the majority of the participants stated
that they would listen to eight presentations most efficiently.
IMC J Med Sci 2021; 15(2): 007.&amp;nbsp;DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/imcjms.v15i2.55879  
*Correspondence: Mustafa Boğan, Emergency Department, School of
Medicine, Düzce University, Postacode: 81620. Turkey. Email: mustafabogan@hotmail.com
&amp;nbsp;
Introduction
Congresses are formal gatherings of people
with similar businesses or interests that span a few days and allow them to
express their ideas [1]. For academics, congresses are not just a scientific or
business opportunity, but also a chance to travel [2]. In recent years,
congresses have begun to be recognized as a tourist model, and this phenomenon,
known as congress tourism, has begun to appeal to attendees in terms of entertainment,
lodging, and vacation [3]. The hotels where the National Emergency Medicine
Congresses are hosted, which are held once a year, contribute to congress
tourism. Even though subject, hall, and time standardize scientific material,
the attendees&#039; overall impressions of the congresses are not reported. The
purpose of this study is to find out what attendees of emergency medicine
congresses think about the motivations for attending the events and what they
think about the congress presentations.
&amp;nbsp;
Methodology
Hasan Kalyoncu University&#039;s ethics
committee granted authorization for the study (Date: 20/11/2018 Decision
number: 2018/32). The survey study began on April 19, 2019, on the first day of
the 14th National Emergency Medicine Congress of the Association of Emergency
Medicine Specialists (EPAT), and lasted for 6 (six) months. Gender, age,
academic title, and length of service, followed by demographic questions, were all
included in the Google Forms survey. There were 16 questions, each with five
options, about congress experiences. Participants received surveys via SMS,
e-mail, and social media messenger programs (WhatsApp, etc.). On the first
page, the participant was asked whether they wanted to take part in the survey.
Those who agreed to take part were brought to a page with questions. EPAT
provided contact information for the participants. Participants who had
attended at least one congress were asked to complete surveys.
Statistical analysis: Exact and Pearson Chi-square tests were used to
examine the relationships between the independent variables at the categorical
measurement level. Categorical variables were given numerical and percentage
values as descriptive statistics. For statistical analysis, the SPSS Windows
version 24.0-package program was used, and p ≤ 0.05 was considered
statistically significant.
&amp;nbsp;
Results
In total, 238 participants took part in
the study. Of the total participants, 73.9% (n = 176) were male; the majority
of the participants (n = 68, 28.6 %) were between the ages of 35 and 39. Participation
was most common with the title of specialist (n = 95, 39.9%). Majority&#039;s length
of service/job was 6-10 years (n = 81, 34.0%). The academic title and gender of
the participants had no relationship (p = 0.084). The academic title advanced
with the age and duration of the service (p &amp;lt; 0.05). Gender, age group, or length
of service had no differences (p&amp;gt; 0.05). Detail is shown in Table-1.
&amp;nbsp;
Table-1: Descriptive data of the
participants (N=238)
&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Table-2: Shows the responses of the
participants to the questions.
Question-1: What is the
most important factor that determines the presentations you entered in the
congress? a) The speaker or session chair is your friend/teacher. b) The
academic title/career of the speaker. c) The speaker is of foreign nationality.
d) Curiosity about the scientific content. e) Other. 
In this question, the option (d) was
marked by 73.1% participants. Among the different academic titleholders, 94.1% associate
professor and those who did not specify marked option (d) while option (a) was marked
most (25.3%) by specialist physicians (p &amp;lt;0.05). 
Question-2: What is your
purpose for attending the congress? a) Refreshing my knowledge. b) Meeting with
your friends. c) Taking a vacation. d) Meeting new local/foreign people. e)
Other.
In this question, option (a) was marked
most (65.0%). A significant difference was observed between the purpose of
attending the congress and the academic title (p = 0.001). Associate professors
were the ones who pointed the option (b) the most, while the specialist physicians
marked the option (d) the most.
Question-3: What should
be the ideal starting time for the presentations in the congress? a) 8:00 am, b)
8:30 am, c) 09:00 am, d) 09:30 am, e) Other.
In this question, the (c) option was
marked the most (54.2%). There were statistically significant (p = 0.001) differences
regarding the ideal starting hour of the presentations at the congress among
the participants having different academic titles. General practitioners,
specialists, physician faculty members, and associate professors had a higher
rate of opinion compared to the other titleholders about the starting time of
09:00 am. 
Question-4: What is the
most disturbing situation for you in the presentations at the congress? a) Not
paying attention to the spelling rules. b) Font size is too small / too large
to be seen. c) Written content containing more than half of a slide. d) The
number of slides exceeding the number of minutes given. e) Other.
In this question, 48.3% participants
marked the option (d). A statistically significant difference was found among the
academic titleholders and the answers given (p = 0.003). Associate professors marked
(c), general practitioners and research assistants marked (d) at a higher rate
compared to other titleholders. 
Question-5: How many
presentations can you listen to efficiently and carefully in a day at the
congress? a) 1-4, b) 5-8, c) 9-12, d) 13-16, e) Other.
In this question, the most preferred (47.9%)
option was (b). There was no statistically significant difference among the
academic titleholders and the answers given (p = 0.106). 
Question-6: How many
slides in a presentation would allow you to listen more carefully? a) 5-10, b)
11-15, c) 16-20, d) 21-25, e) Other. 
In this question, option (c) was marked
the most (39.1%). A statistically significant difference was found between the
academic title and the answers given (p = 0.001). Associate professors marked (d),
general practitioners marked (c), and research assistants marked (b), at a
higher rate compared to other titleholders. 
Question-7: Which of the
following expresses your thoughts about paramedical video, photographs, quotations,
etc. in congress presentations? a) I think it distracts me. b) I think it
enriches the presentation. c) I consider it an unwarranted action. d) I think
it allows the audience to rest in the presentation. e) Other.
In this question, the most preferred (45.4%)
option was (b). There was no statistically significant difference between the
academic titleholders and the answers given (p = 0.194).
Question-8: Which of the
following expresses your thoughts about medical videos, photographs,
quotations, etc. in congress presentations? a) I think it distracts me. b) I
think it enriches the presentation. c) I consider it an unwarranted action. d)
I think it allows the audience to be heard in the presentation. e) Other.
In this question, (b) was the most
preferred option (68.1%). A statistically significant difference was found
between the academic titleholders and the answers given (p = 0.003). Doctor
faculty members and those whose title was not specified marked option (b) at a
higher rate compared to the other titleholders.
Question-9: Which of the
following expresses you best about your speaker preferences at the congress? a)
I prefer to listen to speakers with higher academic titles (professor, associate
professor). b) I prefer to listen to foreign speakers. c) I prefer to listen if
I find the speakers more dynamic. d) I prefer to listen to speakers from different
departments. e) Other.
In this question, the most preferred
option was (a) and marked by 30.7% participants. There were statistically
significant differences between the academic title and the answers given (p =
0.001). Associate professors and general practitioners marked option (a) at a
higher rate compared to other titleholders. 
Question-10: Which of the
following expresses your opinion about the Turkish presentations, presentations
in English, and oral presentations in many halls at the same time in the
congress? a) Having a conversation in several halls at the same time distracts
me. b) Speaking in several halls at the same time increases the efficiency of
the congress. c) Having a conversation in several halls at the same time causes
me to miss important topics and speakers. d) Having a speech in several halls
at the same time allows me to switch from one presentation to another in a
short time. e) Other.
In this question, 62.6% participants
marked the option (c). A statistically significant relationship was observed
between the academic title and the answers given (p = 0.001). Researchers,
specialists, and those whose title was not specified marked (c) at a higher
rate compared to other titleholders.
Question-11: From which
sources do you think the presentations at the congress should be prepared? a) I
prefer the presentations to be consisted from classical book information. b) I
prefer the presentations to be compiled from classical book information as well
as current research. c) I prefer the presentations to be comprised of current
research and information rather than classical book information. d) I prefer
the presentations to be compiled from the works and experiences of the speaker
on the relevant subject, together with current research and information. e)
Other.
In this question, the (d) option was
marked most (41.2%). There was no statistically significant difference between
the academic title and the answers given (p = 0.174). 
Question-12: Which one of
the following expresses your opinions if the presentation exceeds the given time?
a) If the presentation content is of good quality, it does not distract me from
exceeding the time. b) Even if the presentation content is of good quality, it
distracts me if the time is exceeded. c) If the presentation time is exceeded,
I will consider leaving the hall. d) I think that the speaker is not well
prepared if the presentation time exceeds. e) Other. 
In this question, option (a) was marked by
57.1% participants. A statistically significant relationship was observed among
the different academic titleholders (p = 0.001). General practitioners,
research assistants, specialists, and physician faculty members marked option (a)
at a higher rate compared to other titleholders.
Question-13: In your
opinion, what is the ideal place/time to ask questions to speaker about the
presentation? a) Immediately after the presentation. b) At the end of all
presentations in the session. c) Questions should be taken during the coffee
break, not during the session. d) Questions should be given in writing, not
verbally. It should be included in the abstract book with its answers. e)
Other.
In this question, option (a) was marked
most (71%). A statistically significant relationship was observed between the
academic titleholders and the answers given (p = 0.001). Associate professors,
research assistants, and physician faculty members marked option (a) at a
higher rate compared to other titleholders.
Question-14: In your
opinion, which of the following factors is the most responsible for the
prolongation of the presentations in the congress? a) The speaker comes
unprepared. b) The speaker&#039;s slides are long. c) Too many questions on the
subject. d) The chairperson of the session is not sensitive about the time. e)
Other.
In this question, the most preferred (51.3%)
option was (b). A statistically significant relationship was observed between
the academic title and the answers given (p = 0.001). General practitioners
have indicated option (d). Associate professors, research assistants, and
specialist physicians marked option (b) at a higher rate compared to other
titleholders.
Question-15: Which of the
following best expresses your opinions about not only medical but also
paramedical issues and competitions in congress presentations? a) Paramedical
issues and competitions do not interest me. b) I think paramedical subjects and
competitions will color the congress. c) I believe that paramedical subjects
and competitions reduce the level of the congress. d) I think that paramedical
topics and competitions increase cohesion between participants. e) Other.
In this question, the most preferred (47.9%)
option was (b). A statistically significant relationship was observed between
the academic title and the answers given (p = 0.001). Research assistants and
specialist physicians marked option (b) at a higher rate compared to other
titleholders.
Question-16: How many
minutes do you think should be the ideal time for a presentation? Options: a) 5,
b) 10, c) 15, d) 20, e) 25 minutes.
In this question, the option (d) was
marked most (43.3%). A statistically significant relationship was observed
between the academic titleholders and the answers given (p = 0.001). General
practitioners, physician faculty members, associate professors, and those whose
title was not specified marked (d) at a higher rate compared to other
titleholders.
There was no difference between gender and
the answers given to the questionnaire (p&amp;gt; 0.05).
&amp;nbsp;
Table-2: Survey questions and answers given by the
participants (N=238)
&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Discussion
As in many sectors, meetings (congresses,
symposiums, conferences, etc.) are organized in the field of medicine/emergency
medicine. However, there is not enough data regarding the opinions of the
participants in these congresses on the contents of the congresses. Although
the number and cost of these meetings, which have an important place in many
medical disciplines, are unclear, an estimate of
more than 100&amp;nbsp;000 medical meetings per year might not be unrealistic, [4]. Although the format of medical conferences has
not changed for a long time, there is a lot that participants can do, such as
expanding their knowledge, seeking new ideas, meeting new people, participating
in social events, dealing with catering and promotions in the exhibition and
stand areas [5]. In a medical meeting, which is an effective training method in
professional development and maturation, professionals can receive experience
transfer from their peers and seniors [6]. At the national and international
congresses organized by EPAT every year, there are participants and speakers
from many countries [7,8]. It has been determined that the majority of the
participants in these congresses, which are enriched with social activities as
well as scientific content and held in holiday-concept hotels, are more
interested in scientific content than holidays. 
Although many medical meetings are
enjoyable, they often distract attention because of tiring and busy schedule
[7,8]. For example, at the 15th National Emergency Medicine Congress organized
by EPAT, there was an intense program in 4 halls, from morning to evening and
also included 16-20 presentations daily in each hall, and each presentation
lasted approximately 20 minutes [7]. The 16th National Congress was similar,
additionally, oral presentations were made in different halls in both
congresses [7,8]. Similarly, congresses organized by the American College of
Emergency Physicians (ACEP) are full of lectures, courses, panels, and
activities that start in more than one field at the same time continue from the
early morning until the evening [9]. Unlike congresses with intensive programs,
the majority of the participants do not seem to embrace this intensity much.
While most of the participants (n = 114, 47.9%) stated that they would listen
to 5-8 presentations in a day efficiently, the number of those saying they could
listen to 1-4 presentations efficiently, was quite high (n = 90, 37.8%). About 62.6%
of the participants stated that having activities and lessons in more than one
field at the same time would cause them to miss important topics and speakers.
Although it is for medical purposes, these
meetings may include programs aimed at paramedical activities and socialization
[7-9]. These activities can be in the form of knowledge competitions, sports tournaments,
or music concerts [8, 9]. In our study, 47.9% of the participants expressed a
positive opinion that such activities will color the congress. It has been
argued that visuals such as photographs, graphics, etc. which are less relevant
and unrelated to the subject used in the preparation of the presentation
attract the attention of the audience and make the presentation more effective
[10,11]. In our study, 68.1% to 45.4% of the participants stated that the
visuals with medical and paramedical content respectively enrich the
presentations.
&amp;nbsp;
Conclusion
Even if congresses are held in holiday
hotels, participants are more interested in scientific content. Paramedical
activities and visuals used in presentations are viewed positively. Although
there are very intense programs in the congress, the majority of the
participants stated that they would listen to 8 presentations most efficiently.
It is recommended to utilize these data while organizing congresses or
preparing presentations.
&amp;nbsp;
Conflict
of interest: None
&amp;nbsp;
References
1.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Conference. Oxford
Learner’s Dictionaries. (Accesseddate 10Sep2020) Available from: https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/american_english/conference.
2.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Kocabulut
Ö.&amp;nbsp;[Determination of
the academics’ participation motivation to ınternatıonal congresses]. Seyahat ve Otel İşletmeciliği Dergisi. 2017;&amp;nbsp;14(1): 48-58. Turkish
3.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Çelik
Yetim A. [A research on
experientıal values for congress events]. Seyahat ve Otel İşletmeciliği Dergisi. 2015;&amp;nbsp;12(2). 57-72. Turkish 
4.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Ioannidis
JPA. Are medical conferences useful? And for whom? JAMA. 2012; 307(12): 1257–1258.
5.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Wiffen P.
What&#039;s in a congress? Eur J Hosp
Pharm. 2015; 22:63.
6.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Elhassan
M. Success and survival conference: a novel idea to resonate an under utilized concept
in medical education.&amp;nbsp;Int J Med Educ. 2017; 8: 273-275.
7.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 15. Ulusal Acil Tıp
Kongresi. (2019). (Accessed date 13Sep 2020), Available from: http://www.atuder.org.tr/atuderData/Document/252019214037-15-acil-tip-PROGRAMson.pdf
8.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; 14. Ulusal Acil Tıp
Kongresi. (2018). (Accesseddate 13 Sep 2020), Available from: https://www.atuder.org.tr/atuderData/Document/25420181507-14-acil-tip-PROGRAM-2.pdf
9.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; ACEP’s 50th
Anniversary, San Diego (2018). (Accessed date 13 Sep 2020), Available from:https://www.acep.org/static/globalassets/resources/documents/sa-documents/acep18brochure.pdf
10.&amp;nbsp; Doğan NÖ. Kongre Sunumu
Yapmak (Accessed date 10Sep 2020), Available from: https://acilci.net/kongrede-sunum-yapmak/
&amp;nbsp;11. Tatar H. İyi Bir Sunum Nasıl Hazırlanır? (Accessed date 10 Sep
2020), Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QG6_qKIxcxY</description>

            </item>
            
    <copyright>2026 Ibrahim Medical College. All rights reserved.</copyright>
</channel>
</rss>
