<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://imcjms.com/assets/rss.css" ?><rss version="2.0">
<channel>
    <title>IMC Journal of Medical Science</title>
    <link>https://imcjms.com</link>
    <description>Ibrahim Medical College Journal of Medical Science</description>

                        <item>
                <title><![CDATA[A distance education experience on
assessment of airway maneuvers during COVID-19 pandemic]]></title>

                                    <author><![CDATA[M. Murat Oktay]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Mustafa Boğan]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Mustafa Sabak]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Hasan Gümüşboğa]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[İbrahim Bilir]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Mehmet Cihat Demir]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Hüseyin Narcı]]></author>
                
                <link data-url="https://imcjms.com/registration/journal_full_text/362">
    https://imcjms.com/registration/journal_full_text/362
</link>
                <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2021 03:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
                <category><![CDATA[Original Article]]></category>
                <comments><![CDATA[MC J Med Sci 2021; 15(1): 001]]></comments>
                <description>Abstract
Background and objectives: The coronavirus
disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has necessitated the switch to distance
education by abandoning face-to-face education worldwide. This study aimed to
investigate whether it is possible for practical education and performance
measurements through distance education.
Methods: The application video and the
application steps were sent to the participants through their smartphone by
WhatsApp messenger. Grade 1 students in the Physiotherapy Section (Group A) and
Grade 1 students in the Paramedic Section (Group B) voluntarily participated in
the study. The participants were asked to apply simulation applications and
record the simulation applications&#039; video clips with their smartphones.
Results: The mean age of the 123
participants was 20.11 ± 2.03 (18-33) years, and
56 (45.5%) were in Group A, and 67 (54.5%) were in Group B. While the
participants in Group A were successful at a rate of 35.7% (n = 20) in the head
tilt-chin lift maneuver, this rate was 65.7% (n = 44) for Group B (p = 0.001).
For the jaw thrust maneuver, the success rate was 21.4% (n = 12) for Group A
and 31.3% (n = 21) for Group B. 
Conclusion: In this study, the participants
used family members as a live simulation model in our research. The participants
who were given face-to-face education before were more successful on head tilt
chin lift maneuver. Jaw thrust maneuver was more challenging to learn and
practice by distance education. The academicians interested in medical
education should keep in mind that the outcomes of the COVID-19 pandemic have
permanent effects on education systems.
IMC J Med Sci 2021; 15(1): 001.&amp;nbsp;DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/imcjms.v15i1.54195      
*Correspondence: Mustafa Boğan, Emergency Department, Health Research
and Application Hospital, Düzce
University, Düzce, Turkey, Posta code: 81620.&amp;nbsp; Email: mustafabogan@hotmail.com
&amp;nbsp;
Introduction
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)
pandemic has necessitated the switch to distance education through abandoning
face-to-face education worldwide [1-2]. Distance education models have been
used in medical education during the recent 30 years; distance practical
education is still a problem [3-7]. On the other hand, useful and reliable methods
could not be developed to evaluate distance education efficiency [7].
Basic Life Support (BLS) is among
the most common practical education by using technological items [8-10]. In
didactic medical education models, airway maneuvers are taught on models by an
experienced instructor, in addition to theoretical educations [11]. Practical
education is the main difficulty of distance education systems.In this study, we aimed to teach the airway maneuvers [the head
tilt-chin lift (HTCL) maneuver and the jaw thrust (JT) maneuver] by distance
education, and to evaluate by video clips which content practical application
of the participants on a family member. It was also aimed at integrated
simulation education to distance education in accordance with the education
needs that have changed abruptly during the COVID-19 pandemic.
&amp;nbsp;
Methods
Table-1: Global Quality score
&amp;nbsp; 
The application steps were scored
separately (Table-2 and Table-3). While evaluating the videos, each application
step was scored as &quot;1 point&quot; if it was done correctly and &quot;0
points&quot; if it was not done correctly. Both applications were evaluated in 8
sub-steps. Each participant received a minimum of &quot;0&quot; and a maximum
of &quot;8&quot; points from the applications. The participant who got eight
full points from an application was considered successful; the participant who
got &amp;lt; 8 points was unsuccessful. The videos were scored separately by two
independent observers (two emergency medicine specialists with a minimum of 5
years of experience) using a rubric. Pearson Correlation test was used to
determine rater reliability, which shows consistency between raters. Analysis
results showed a high correlation between raters (r = 0.90; p &amp;lt; 0.05).
The two groups were compared
according to gender, duration of the videos, HTCL and JT score, success level
of HTCL and JT.
&amp;nbsp;
Table-2: Head tilt chin
lift assessment steps 

&amp;nbsp;
Table-3: Jaw thrust assessment steps 
&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Statistical Analysis
The normality distribution of the
data was evaluated with the Shapiro Wilk test. The Student’s t test was used
for comparison of two independent normally distributed groups and the Mann
Whitney U test was used for comparison of two independent non-normally
distributed groups. The associations between categorical variables were
analyzed with the Pearson and exact chi-square tests.Pearson Correlation test was used to determine rater reliability, which
shows consistency between raters. For the descriptive statistics, the mean ±
standard deviation was used for the numerical variables, and numbers and
percentages were used for the categorical variables. Statistical analyses were carried
out using the SPSS Windows version 24.0 package program and a p level of &amp;lt; 0.05
was accepted as statistically significant.
&amp;nbsp;
Results
&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Discussion
Studies have reported that some methodological
innovations are required for to develop the students’ knowledge and skills in
distance education environments [13-17]. The studies toward developing novel
education paradigms are mostly based on comparison of didactic education
systems and distance education systems. Gallagher et al. determined that
students who received web-based distance education demonstrated better
attendance and motivation [18]. In the study of Sarıhan et al. comparing two
emergency medicine resident groups who had received traditional and video-assisted
education, no significant difference was found between the groups concerning
pre-test and post-test scores [19]. Bernard et al. evaluated the studies
investigating learning methods between 1985 and 2002 and found that distance
education models achieved better learning [20]. However, some education models,
which use both didactic education systems and distance education systems, are
also available [21,22]. Our study compares distance education procedures (Group
A) and blended education procedures (Group B). In our research, while there was
no difference between the groups about the JT maneuver, Group B, the complex
education group, yielded better results for the HTCL maneuver. In this regard,
our study results are consistent with those of studies proposing that complex
education systems that integrate didactic learning models and distance education
systems positively influence learning [22,23]. One of the most critical distance
education problems is feedback and testing of lesson elements [7,24]. Assessments
of the performance were mostly made with traditional methods in many studies
comparing e-education models and traditional education models. Our study, the
participants recorded their applications on videos through cell phones, and
their learning performances were evaluated through these videos. Hence, we
could show that a performance assessment criterion could be developed for distance
education by assessing videos recorded by the participants. It is possible to
state that although simple, this is a methodological innovation type under
pandemic conditions, and it is one of the unique aspects of our study. On the
other hand, this was mandatory for us under pandemic conditions despite limited
evidence about the effectiveness of offline video applications on e-learning [25].
However, it should be stated that the duration of the application videos
recorded by the researchers and participants were shorter than the 5-7 min
reported in the literature [24].
Barsuk et al. showed that the medical student group
which received practical education through a simulator was more successful in
airway management [30]. Birt et al. did not detect a difference between the two
groups of paramedic students, one of which received a classical education for removing
foreign bodies in the airway and another received distance education with
telephone and plastic laryngoscopes obtained with a 3D printer [31]. In our
study, which yielded practice training through live models, the finding of similar
results in the two groups about the JT maneuver is consistent with the studies that
have proposed that learning through e-education only is an effective way of
learning [32]. The participants in both groups mostly made errors in the 6th
step of the JT maneuver. This is the step that is frequently taken incorrectly
by the participants, also during face-to-face training. The subject should
repeat the procedure several times; besides, he/she needs to be instructed individually.
Studies propose that formal assessment systems are insufficient in medical
education [33]. We suggest that it is an advantageous method in hands-on
training as it is possible to monitor learning, provide feedback to the student,
and provide assessment data for the teacher. Studies are proposing that online
lessons of the formal assessment methods are also possible [33-35]. We could
not apply formal methods individually online due to the pandemic’s restricted
time. We suggest that this is a factor that plays a role in the low (&amp;lt; 30%)
success rates in both groups.
Due to the restricted time, the steps that were misapplied
by the participants could only be discussed with them individually online. Not
asking for a second video after the application has led to a limitation concerning
performance assessment. Furthermore, the satisfaction of the participants could
not be evaluated.
The academicians interested in medical education
should keep in mind that the outcomes of the COVID-19 pandemic have permanent
effects on education systems. The COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated the
development of a novel education paradigm based on information technologies.
The need for integration of simulation education with distance education has
also emerged during this process. Although our study indicates that distance
hands-on training may be practical, it is also an example of assessing this
education. We consider that virtual reality applications could contribute to
medical education, and further studies should be conducted on this issue.
References
1.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Srinivasan DK. Medical students’ perceptions and an anatomy
teacher&#039;s personal experience using an e‐learning platform for tutorials during
the Covid‐19 crisis.&amp;nbsp;Anat Sci Edu. 2020; 13(3): 318–319.
</description>

            </item>
            
    <copyright>2026 Ibrahim Medical College. All rights reserved.</copyright>
</channel>
</rss>
