<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://imcjms.com/assets/rss.css" ?><rss version="2.0">
<channel>
    <title>IMC Journal of Medical Science</title>
    <link>https://imcjms.com</link>
    <description>Ibrahim Medical College Journal of Medical Science</description>

                        <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Neonatal
sepsis due to non-albicans Candida species and their susceptibility
to antifungal agents: first report from Bangladesh]]></title>

                                    <author><![CDATA[Rafia Afreen Jalil]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[K.M. Shahidul Islam]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Lovely Barai]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Shahida Akhter]]></author>
                
                <link data-url="https://imcjms.com/registration/journal_full_text/358">
    https://imcjms.com/registration/journal_full_text/358
</link>
                <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2021 01:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
                <category><![CDATA[Original Article]]></category>
                <comments><![CDATA[IMC J Med Sci 2020; 14(2): 005]]></comments>
                <description>Abstract
Background and objectives: Frequency&amp;nbsp;of
neonatal sepsis in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICU) has&amp;nbsp;been
increasing&amp;nbsp;worldwide over the&amp;nbsp;last decades. The emergence of non-albicans Candida (NAC) species
and their resistance to common antifungal agents become an important preventive
and therapeutic issue. The present study was undertaken to find
out the role of NAC species in neonatal sepsis/candidemia in the NICUs of
hospitals of Dhaka city. The susceptibility pattern of NAC species to
antifungal agents was also determined. 
Materials and methods: Suspected cases
of neonatal sepsis admitted in NICU of four tertiary care hospitals of Dhaka
city, from March to
December 2018 were enrolled. In this cross sectional study, blood
samples were collected from neonates with suspected sepsis for culture.Identification of
Candidaspecies was done
by carbohydrate (CHO) assimilation tests using swab auxanographic technique,
CHO impregnated yeast nitrogen base plate method (YNB), microtiter plate based
miniaturized method and by HiCromeTM Candida Differential Media. Susceptibility of the isolated Candida species to antifungal agents was
determined by disk diffusion (DD) and by minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC)
methods. MIC was determined by broth microdilution method using RPMI 1640 and trypticase
soy broth (TSB). 
Results:
In the present study, NAC species were isolated from 39.7% neonates. C. tropicalis was the predominant
species (81.0%) followed by C.
parapsilosis (12.1%), C. auris (5.2%)
and C. dubliniensis (1.7%).Isolated NAC species were 98.3% sensitive to voriconazole.
Sensitivity to fluconazole, ketoconazole, itraconazole, and clotrimazole was
3.5%, 15.5%, 86.2% and 56.9% respectively by DD method. All the isolates (100%) were sensitive
to miconazole and nystatin. All
the C. tropicalis, C. auris and C. dubliniensis were sensitive to amphotericin B and anidulafungin.
One and four C. parapsilosis were
found resistant to amphotericin B and anidulafungin respectively. The
MIC results obtained by using RPMI 1640 and TSB as growth medium were
concordant suggesting that TSB media was a good alternative to expensive RPMI
1640.
Conclusion: The advent of NAC species merits
attention as they are highly resistant to most of the azoles. Therefore, speciation of Candida in neonatal candidemia is essential to institute appropriate
antifungal therapy.
IMC J Med Sci 2020; 14(2): 005. EPub date: 13
January 2021.&amp;nbsp;DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/imcjms.v14i2.52827  
*Correspondence: Rafia Afreen
Jalil, Department of Microbiology, Green Life Medical College, Green Road,
Dhaka, Bangladesh. Email: rafiaafreen133@gmail.com
&amp;nbsp;
Introduction
Over the last two decades, blood stream infection (BSI) by Candida species has become a significant
issue in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Candidemia is the third most
common cause of late onset sepsis in neonates. It is responsible for 9-13% of BSI in neonates and is
associated with high crude and attributable mortality rates [1].
Among the Candida
species, C. albicans is the most
commonly isolated organism. But recently non-albicans Candida (NAC) species have emerged as potential pathogens,
particularly C. tropicalis, C. parapsilosis, C. krusei, C. glabrata and
C. auris [2-4]. Various factors such as broad spectrum
antibiotics, indwelling devices, prematurity, low birth weight (LBW), total
parenteral nutrition (TPN), artificial ventilation and gastrointestinal surgery
contribute to the risk of fungal colonization and infection. Also, fungal
colonization is associated with overcrowding in the NICU, inadequate
nurse-to-patient ratio and poor hygiene practices. Approximately 10% of the
newborns are colonized during the first week of life and up to 64% of them get
colonized by 4 weeks stay in hospital [5-6]. Candida species may spread via vertical transmission
from the maternal flora or by horizontal transmission from the healthcare
workers (HCW) hands [7-8].
Majority of the Candida species become resistant to the
antifungal agents, mainly to triazole compounds, by the expression of efflux
pumps that minimize drug accumulation, altering the structure or concentration
of antifungal target proteins and modification of membrane sterol composition
[9,10]. Some NAC species are intrinsically resistant to fluconazole and newer
triazoles. Therefore, speciation and antifungal susceptibility of all the yeast
isolates are essential. Owing to significant regional heterogeneity, local
epidemiological data is crucial in the prevention and management of invasive
candidiasis.
No study has yet been carried out in Bangladesh on the frequency
and the types of NAC species responsible for sepsis in neonates admitted at the
NICUs of different hospitals. The present study was undertaken to determine the
NAC species and their antifungal
susceptibility pattern causing neonatal sepsis in the NICUs of four tertiary
care hospitals of Dhaka city.
&amp;nbsp;
Materials and
methods
This
cross sectional hospital based study was carried out in the Department of
Microbiology, Bangladesh Institute of Research and Rehabilitation in Diabetes,
Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders (BIRDEM) in collaboration with Department of
Neonatology of four tertiary care hospitals of Dhaka city.
The study period was from March,
2018 to December, 2018. The study was approved by the Institutional Ethical Committee
of each institution and written informed consents from patients’ guardian were
obtained prior to collection of samples.
&amp;nbsp;
Study population and collection of blood samples:
Neonates admitted in respective NICUs with suspected septicemia were included
in the study. About 1-2 ml of peripheral venous blood samples were collected
aseptically from enrolled neonates. Immediately, 0.5-1 ml of blood was
inoculated in BacT/Alert PF plus bottle and remaining 0.5-1 ml blood inoculated
in the lytic blood culture tube. The specimens were transported immediately to
microbiology laboratory of BIRDEM. Since Candida
could be part of skin flora of neonates admitted in hospital, its isolation
from blood culture might reflect contamination from skin flora. To rule out
this contamination, a second blood sample was collected from the culture
positive cases. 
Candidemia was diagnosed by isolation
of Candida species from at least two consecutive
blood samples with clinical features of septicemia.
&amp;nbsp;
Isolation and identification of NAC
species: Culture was performed using standard
microbiological techniques [11,12].
Candida was identified by
colony morphology, wet film and Gram stain. Species identification was done by
germ tube test, carbohydrate (CHO) assimilation tests using swab auxanographic
technique, carbohydrate impregnated yeast nitrogen base plate method and microtitre
plate based miniaturized method, modified enrichment broth growth assay and
HiCromeTM Candida
Differential Media [13-16]. Yeast nitrogen
base, bromocresol purple and eleven types
of carbohydrates were used in all the three methods of CHO assimilation tests.
In swab auxanographic method, carbohydrate was incorporated in individual discs.
In the mictotitre plate and CHO impregnated YNB plate methods, the
carbohydrates were incorporated in the media. Growth in the media and turning
the bromocresol purple to yellow indicated utilization of particular
carbohydrate. C. auris was further confirmed by modified enrichment broth growth assay
with salt yeast nitrogen base broth.Growth at 420C and development of a yellow
colour in the medium indicated C. auris.
The Candida isolates were inoculated on HiCromeTM Candida Differential Media and incubated at 370C for 24 hours
and the species were identified by colour of the colonies as per manufacturer’s
instructions.
&amp;nbsp;
Antifungal susceptibility tests: Antifungal susceptibility test was performed by disk diffusion method using
Mueller-Hinton agar supplemented with 2% glucose and 0.5 µg/ml methylene blue
dye. Inhibition zones for fluconazole and
voriconazole were interpreted according to validated CLSI (M44-A) [17], while
for other drugs the inhibition zones were adopted from published studies [18-20]. Broth microdilution was done to determine
minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of fluconazole, amphotericin B and
anidulafungin as per NCCLs M27-A2 and EUCAST v 7.3.1 [21,22] using both RPMI 1640 and trypticase soy
broth as growth medium. For determination of minimal fungicidal concentration
(MFC), 2 µl of broth was
withdrawn from the optically clear MIC well of respective antifungal agent (concentrations
above the MIC) and plated on Sabouraud dextrose agar plate and incubated at 350C
for 72 hrs. MFC was defined as the lowest drug concentration that yielded less
than three colonies, a killing activity of ~ 99% [23].
&amp;nbsp;
Results
A total of 146 neonates with suspected sepsis were enrolled in the
study. Out of 146 suspected cases of neonatal sepsis, 91 (62.3%) yielded
positive blood culture. NAC species was isolated from 58 (39.7%) cases and
remaining 33 (22.6%) yielded growth of bacteria (Table-1). Detail rate of
isolation of NAC species from different categories of study population is shown
in Table-1. Rate of isolation of NAC species from term and preterm babies were 19.1%
and 43.2% respectively. Fungal culture positivity among normal birth weight (NBW),
low birth weight (LBW) and very low birth weight (VLBW) babies were 26.3%,
46.8% and 33.3% respectively. Of the 58 NAC species isolated, 3 were from
neonates with early-onset sepsis and the rest 55 were from cases with
late-onset sepsis. The ratio of isolation of NAC species in neonates of diabetic and non diabetic mother was 2:1. Table-2
shows that C. tropicalis was the
predominant species (81.0%) followed by C.
parapsilosis (12.1%), C. auris (5.2%)
and C. dubliniensis (1.7%).
&amp;nbsp;
Table-1:
Rate of isolation of NAC species and
bacteria from different category of study population
&amp;nbsp;
Susceptibility of NAC species to fluconazole, ketoconazole,
itraconazole, clotrimazole and nystatin by disc diffusion method is shown in
Table-3. Out of 58 NAC isolates, 96.6%, 84.5%, 13.8% and 43.1% were resistant
to fluconazole, ketoconazole, itraconazole and clotrimazole respectively.
Except one C. parapsilosis isolate,
none was resistant to voriconazole. None of the isolated NAC species was
resistant to miconazole and nystatin.
&amp;nbsp;
Table-2:
Types of NAC species isolated from study
population (n=58)
&amp;nbsp;
Table-3:
Antifungal susceptibility pattern of the
isolated NAC species by disk diffusion method
&amp;nbsp;
Table-4 shows the resistance pattern of isolated NAC species to
fluconazole, amphotericin B and anidulafungin by MIC method. Among the 47 C. tropicalis, 44 (93.6%) were resistant
to fluconazole. C. parapsilosis, C. auris and C. dubliniensis were 100% resistant to fluconazole by both disc
diffusion and MIC methods. All the C. tropicalis, C. auris and C. dubliniensis
were sensitive to amphotericin B and anidulafungin. Out of 7 C. parapsilosis, 1 (14.3%) and 4 (57.1%)
were found resistant to amphotericin B and anidulafungin respectively. The MIC
results obtained by using RPMI 1640 and TSB as growth medium were concordant
suggesting that TSB media could be a good alternative to expensive RPMI 1640.
&amp;nbsp;
Table-4:
Antifungal susceptibility pattern of
isolated NAC species to fluconazole, amphotericin B and anidulafungin by MIC
method
&amp;nbsp;
Table-5 shows the MIC50 and MIC90 of
fluconazole, amphotericin B and anidulafungin of isolated NAC species. MIC50 value of fluconazole for
all the NAC isolates were in the resistant range. MIC50 of
amphotericin B for C. tropicalis, C. parapsilosis, C. auris and C. dubliniensis
were 0.5 µg/ml, 1 µg/ml, 1 µg/ml and 0.25 µg/ml respectively and these values
were all within the sensitive range. Only MIC90 of amphotericin B
for C. parapsilosis was 2 µg/ml which
was in the resistant range. MIC50 of anidulafungin for C. parapsilosis was 4 µg/ml and was in
the resistant range. Both MIC50 and MIC90 of
anidulafungin for rest of the Candida
species were within the sensitive range. The lowest drug concentration required
to inhibit the growth of 50% of organisms (MIC50) and minimum concentration required
to kill 50% of viable organisms (MFC50) of the antifungal drugs for
all the Candida species were
calculated and shown in Table-6. MFC50 was 2 fold higher than MIC50
for fluconazole, amphotericin B and anidulafungin for all the NAC species.
&amp;nbsp;
Table-5:
MIC50 and MIC90 of
fluconazole, amphotericin B and anidulafungin of isolated NAC species
&amp;nbsp;
Table-6:
MIC50 versus MFC50 of
fluconazole, amphotericin B and anidulafungin for all NAC species
&amp;nbsp;
Discussion
The present study has for the first time demonstrated the distribution
of different non-albicans Candida
species responsible for sepsis among neonates admitted in the NICUs of
different hospitals in Dhaka city. In the current study 39.7% neonates were
culture positive for NAC species. ARTEMIS Antifungal Surveillance study
conducted between June 1997 and December 2007 in 41 countries reported a
declining trend in isolation of C.
albicans from 70.9%&amp;nbsp;to 65.9% [24]. A similar trend of emergence
of&amp;nbsp;NAC speciesin
bloodstream infection has also been documented in a number of studies [25-31].
In
this study, prematurity, LBW, VLBW, antibiotic prophylaxis and extended
hospital stay could be the important reasons for high isolation of NAC species.
Long-term use of broad-spectrum antibiotics in routine empiric therapy also
contributes to an overgrowth of opportunistic Candida by reducing the competitive pressure imparted by normal
bacterial flora [32]. Also, increased use of azole
antifungal agents, particularly fluconazole, leads to an increase in the
distribution of NAC species and a
decrease in C. albicans [33].
In the present study, among NAC species,
C. tropicalis was the most common species
(81.0%). Various other studies have also reported C. tropicalis to be the most common isolate [3,30,31].Pressure of fluconazole prophylaxis could be&amp;nbsp;the
reason behind this high rate of isolation of C. tropicalis in this study.
The isolated NAC species were 98.3%
sensitive to voriconazole and this finding is similar to the results published by
other studies [35,36]. In the present study, resistant rate to fluconazole by
the Candida isolates was 87.9% by
disk diffusion and 94.8% by MIC method. All the C. parapsilosis and C. auris were
resistant to fluconazole while C.
tropicalis isolates were 93.6% resistant. These findings were in agreement
with Pandita et al. and Yadav et al [37,38]. All the C. tropicalis,
C. auris and C. dubliniensis were sensitive to amphotericin B and anidulafungin.
Out of 7, only 1 (14.3%) C. parapsilosis
was found resistant to amphotericin B and 4 (57.1%) were resistant to
anidulafungin. Therefore, it appeared that amphotericin B and anidulafungin
could be used against NAC species when the organisms become resistant to other
antifungal agents. There are only few literaturesavailable
regarding the use of echinocandin particularly anidulafungin in the pediatric ICU.
Anidulafungin might be used as an alternative drug in neonates particularly
when the local Candida strains are
resistant to azoles. However, since the first introduction of echinocandins,
these antifungal agents have exhibited higher minimum inhibitory concentrations
against C. parapsilosis. Compared to
other species of Candida, C. parapsilosis demonstrates higher in vitro MICs to echinocandin, and
treatment failures with these antifungal agents have been reported for C. parapsilosis
infections [39,40].
Antifungal susceptibility was done by disk-diffusion and MIC broth
microdilution methods. RPMI 1640 is the proposed medium for carrying out micro
broth dilution by EUCAST and NCCLs (M27-A2). However, RPMI 1640 is very
expensive and not easily available in many laboratories. So, MIC of fluconazole
and amphotericin B for Candida species
were done using both TSB and RPMI 1640 medium and the results were compared.
The MIC results obtained by both the media were concordant suggesting that TSB
broth media could be a good alternative to RPMI 1640.
In
our study, we observed the minimum
fungicidal concentrations (MFC) of fluconazole, amphotericin B and
anidulafungin as 2 fold higher than the MIC. Very little is known regarding the
role of differences between MIC and MFC in treatment failure, and further
studies are required.
The present study provided evidence of
colossal burden of NAC species as an important cause of neonatal sepsis in our
NICUs. The isolated NAC species were found highly resistant to widely used
fluconazole whereas amphotericin B, voriconazole and anidulafungin were the
most effective agents. The results of our study could be used as a template for
the establishment of local guidelines for the effective treatment and
prevention of neonatal candidemia.
&amp;nbsp;
Competing
interest
The authors declared no competing
interests. 
&amp;nbsp;
Funding
None
&amp;nbsp;
References
1.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Benjamin DK, Stoll BJ, Fanaroff AA, McDonald SA, Oh W, Higgins
RD, et al. Neonatal candidiasis among extremely low birth weight infants: risk
factors, mortality rates, and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 18 to 22 months. Pediatrics. 2006; 117(1): 84-92.
2.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Oberoi JK, Wattal C, Goel N, Raveendran R, Datta S, Prasad K.
Non-albicans Candida species in blood
stream infections in a tertiary care hospital at New Delhi, India. Indian J Med Res. 2012; 136(6): 997-1003.
3.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Goel N, Ranjan PK, Aggarwal R, Chaudhary U, Sanjeev N. Emergence
of non-albicans Candida in neonatal
septicemia and antifungal susceptibility: experience from a tertiary care
center. J Lab Physicians. 2009; 1(2): 53-55.
4.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Warris A. Candida auris,
what do paediatricians need to know? Arch
Dis Child. 2018; 103(9): 891-894.
5.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Singhi S, Rao DS, Chakrabarti A. Candida colonization and candidemia in a pediatric intensive care
unit. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2008; 9(1): 91-95.
6.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Rao S, Ali U. Systemic fungal infections in neonates. J Postgrad Med. 2005; 51 Suppl 1: S27-29.
7.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Ariff S, Saleem AF, Soofi SB, Sajjad R. Clinical spectrum and
outcomes of neonatal candidiasis in a tertiary care hospital in Karachi,
Pakistan. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2011; 5(03): 216-223.
8.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Adib SM, Bared EE, Fanous R, Kyriacos S. Practices of Lebanese
gynecologists regarding treatment of recurrent vulvovaginal candidiasis. N Am Med Sci. 2011; 3(9): 406-410.
9.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Sanglard D, Odds FC. Resistance of Candida species to antifungal agents: molecular mechanisms and
clinical consequences. Lancet Infect Dis.
2002; 2(2): 73-85.
10.&amp;nbsp; Magill SS, Shields C, Sears CL, Choti M, Merz WG. Triazole
cross-resistance among Candida spp.:
case report, occurrence among bloodstream isolates, and implications for
antifungal therapy. J Clin Microbiol.
2006; 44(2): 529-535.
11.&amp;nbsp; Cheesbrough M. District laboratory practice in tropical countries,
part 2. Cambridge University Press; 2005.
12.&amp;nbsp; Tarrand JJ, Guillot C, Wenglar M, Jackson J, Lajeunesse JD, Rolston
KV. Clinical comparison of the resin-containing BACTEC 26 Plus and the Isolator
10 blood culturing systems. J Clin
Microbiol. 1991; 29(10): 2245-2249.
13.&amp;nbsp; McGinnis MR. Laboratory handbook of medical mycology. Michigan:
Michigan University Press; 1980. p. 661.
14.&amp;nbsp; Land GA, Vinton EC, Adcock GB, Hopkins JM. Improved auxanographic
method for yeast assimilations: a comparison with other approaches. J Clin Microbiol. 1975; 2(3): 206-217.
15.&amp;nbsp; Devadas SM, Ballal M, Prakash PY, Hande MH, Bhat GV, Mohandas V.
Auxanographic carbohydrate assimilation method for large scale yeast
identification. J Clin Diagn Res.
2017; 11(4): DC01-DC03.
16.&amp;nbsp; Welsh RM, Bentz ML, Shams A, Houston H, Lyons A, Rose LJ, et al.
Survival, persistence, and isolation of the emerging multidrug-resistant
pathogenic yeast Candida auris on a
plastic health care surface. J Clin
Microbiol. 2017; 55(10): 2996-3005.
17.&amp;nbsp; Clinical
and Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods
for antifungal disk diffusion susceptibility testing of yeasts; Approved Guideline M44-A, Vol. 24, Number 15.
2nd ed. Wayne, USA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2004.
18.&amp;nbsp; Pam VK, Akpan JU, Oduyebo OO, Nwaokorie FO, Fowora MA, Oladele RO,
et al. Fluconazole susceptibility and ERG11 gene expression in vaginal Candida species isolated from Lagos
Nigeria. Int J Mol Epidemiol Genet.
2012; 3(1): 84-90.
19.&amp;nbsp; Dota KF, Freitas AR, Consolaro ME, Svidzinski TI. A challenge for
clinical laboratories: detection of antifungal resistance in Candida species causing vulvovaginal
candidiasis. Lab Med. 2011; 42(2): 87-93.
20.&amp;nbsp; Vandeputte P, Larcher G, Bergès T, Renier G, Chabasse D, Bouchara
JP. Mechanisms of azole resistance in a clinical isolate of Candida tropicalis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005; 49(11): 4608-4615.
21.&amp;nbsp; Clinical
and Laboratory Standards Institute. Reference
method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts M27-A2,
Vol. 22, Number15. 2nd ed. Wayne, USA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards
Institute; 2002.
22.&amp;nbsp; European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.
Method for the determination of broth dilution minimum inhibitory
concentrations of antifungal agents for yeasts. EUCAST Definitive Document
E.DEF 7.3. Copenhagen: European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious
Diseases; 2015.
23.&amp;nbsp; Torres-Rodríguez
JM, Alvarado-Ramírez E, Murciano F, Sellart M. MICs and minimum fungicidal
concentrations of posaconazole, voriconazole and fluconazole for Cryptococcus neoformans and Cryptococcus gattii. J.
Antimicrob Chemother. 2008; 62(1):
205-206.
24.&amp;nbsp; Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ, Gibbs DL, Newell VA, Ellis D, Tullio V, et
al. Results from the ARTEMIS DISK Global Antifungal Surveillance Study, 1997 to
2007: a 10.5-year analysis of susceptibilities of Candida species to fluconazole and voriconazole as determined by
CLSI standardized disk diffusion. J Clin
Microbiol. 2010; 48(4): 1366-1377.
25.&amp;nbsp; Kossoff EH, Buescher ES, Karlowicz MG. Candidemia in a neonatal
intensive care unit: trends during fifteen years and clinical features of 111
cases. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1998; 17(6): 504-508.
26.&amp;nbsp; Sardana V, Pandey A, Madan M, Goel SP, Asthana AK. Neonatal
candidemia: a changing trend. Indian J
Pathol Microbiol. 2012; 55(1): 132-133.
27.&amp;nbsp; Rani R, Mohapatra NP, Mehta G, Randhawa VS. Changing trends of Candida species in neonatal septicaemia
in a tertiary North Indian hospital. Indian
J Med Microbiol. 2002; 20(1): 42-44.
28.&amp;nbsp; Femitha P, Joy R, Adhisivam B, Bhat V, Prasad K, Gane BD, Singh R.
Candidemia in neonatal ICU-experience from a tertiary care hospital. Skin. 2013; 5: 13-19.
29.&amp;nbsp; Shrivastava G, Bajpai T, Bhatambare GS, Chitnis V, Deshmukh AB.
Neonatal candidemia: Clinical importance of species identification. Sifa Med J. 2015; 2(2): 37.
30.&amp;nbsp; Capoor MR, Nair D, Deb M, Verma PK, Srivastava L, Aggarwal P.
Emergence of non-albicans Candida
species and antifungal resistance in a tertiary care hospital. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2005; 58(6): 344-348.
31.&amp;nbsp; Agarwal J, Bansal S, Malik GK, Jain A. Trends in neonatal
septicemia: emergence of non-albicans
Candida. Indian pediatrics. 2004;
41(7): 712-715.
32.&amp;nbsp; Benjamin DK, Stoll BJ, Gantz MG, Walsh MC, Sánchez PJ, Das A, et
al. Neonatal candidiasis: epidemiology, risk factors, and clinical judgment. Pediatrics. 2010; 126(4): e865-e873.
33.&amp;nbsp; Filioti J, Spiroglou K, Roilides E. Invasive candidiasis in
pediatric intensive care patients: epidemiology, risk factors, management, and
outcome. Intensive Care Med. 2007; 33(7): 1272-1283.
34.&amp;nbsp; Sopian IL, Sa’adiah Shahabudin MA, Lung LT, Sandai D. Yeast
infection and diabetes mellitus among pregnant mother in Malaysia. Malays J Med Sci. 2016; 23(1): 27-34.
35.&amp;nbsp; Kavitha H, Anuradha K, Venkatesha D. Comparison of susceptibility
of various Candida species isolated
from neonatal septicaemia to voriconazole and fluconazole. IOSR J Pharm Biol Sci. 2014; 9(02):
78-81.
36.&amp;nbsp; Nazir A. Non-albicans Candida
in neonatal septicemia: an emerging clinical entity. Int J Biomed Res. 2016; 7(2):
47-50.
37.&amp;nbsp; Pandita N, Peshin C, Wasim S, Bhat NK, Gupta A. Profile of fungal
septicaemia in new born at a tertiary care hospital in North India. Int J Contemp Pediatr. 2017; 4(2): 455-459.
38.&amp;nbsp; Yadav S, Dahiya S, Budhani D. Candidemia in neonatal intensive care
unit: a cause of concern. Int J Res Med
Sci. 2017; 5(5): 2165-2167.
39.&amp;nbsp; Arendrup MC, Perlin DS. Echinocandin resistance: an emerging
clinical problem? Curr Opin Infect Dis.
2014; 27(6): 484-492.
40.&amp;nbsp; Perlin DS. Echinocandin
resistance, susceptibility testing and prophylaxis: implications for patient
management. Drugs. 2014; 74(14): 1573-1585.</description>

            </item>
            
    <copyright>2026 Ibrahim Medical College. All rights reserved.</copyright>
</channel>
</rss>
