<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://imcjms.com/assets/rss.css" ?><rss version="2.0">
<channel>
    <title>IMC Journal of Medical Science</title>
    <link>https://imcjms.com</link>
    <description>Ibrahim Medical College Journal of Medical Science</description>

                        <item>
                <title><![CDATA[A rare case of isolated tuberculous epididymitis in a young man]]></title>

                                    <author><![CDATA[Majed Basit Momin]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Sandeep Satyanarayana]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Anamika Aluri]]></author>
                
                <link data-url="https://imcjms.com/registration/journal_full_text/314">
    https://imcjms.com/registration/journal_full_text/314
</link>
                <pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2019 11:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
                <category><![CDATA[Clinical Case Report]]></category>
                <comments><![CDATA[IMC J Med Sci 2019; 13(1): 003]]></comments>
                <description>Abstract
Genitourinary
tuberculosis is the second most common extrapulmonary tuberculosis (ETB), after
lymph nodes. Isolated tuberculous epididymitis (ITE) is a rare entity among
genitourinary tuberculosis and is defined as
epididymitis without clinical evidence of either renal or prostate involvement.
We present a case of epididymal tuberculosis in a 26 year
old male which presented as a right scrotal mass. We discussed this case to emphasize that tuberculous etiology
should also be considered in the differential diagnosis of scrotal mass besides
malignancy, and an image guided fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) and
stain for acid fast bacilli (AFB) play crucial role in diagnosis and treatment.
IMC
J Med Sci 2019; 13(1): 003. EPub date: 11 February 2019.&amp;nbsp;DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/imcjms.v13i1.42047  
Address for Correspondence: Dr. Majed B Momin,
Consultant Pathologist, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Yashoda hospital,
Malakpet, Nalgonda x-roads, Hyderabad – 500036, India. Email: majedmomin9@gmail.com
&amp;nbsp;
Introduction
Genitourinary tuberculosis (GUTB) contributes to 30% of extrapulmonary tuberculosis and is a major health problem in
India. Epididymal involvement
accounts for only about 20% of genitourinary TB. It has been postulated that TB
epididymitis almost always results from a tuberculous lesion in the prostate,
which is usually secondary to renal TB [1]. Isolated
tuberculous epididymitis (ITE) without evidence of renal involvement is,
therefore rare and difficult to diagnose. However, ITE may present with a
clinical picture similar to that of a scrotal neoplasm [2].
Ultrasound guided FNAC has low risk of complications,
performable in outpatient departments, repeatable and useful for multiple
lesions [3]. Though ultrasound is able to differentiate neoplastic lesion from
abscess but cannot differentiate tuberculous from non-tuberculous suppurative
lesions. ITE, if diagnosed
correctly, can potentially be cured by anti-TB medications, and surgical
resection is usually reserved for those patients who do not respond to medical
treatment [4]. Here,we present a case of isolated
epididymal tuberculosis, which presented as a right scrotal mass in a 26 year
old male.
Cases Report
A 26-year-young man presented to the outpatient Medicine department,
Yashoda Hospital, Malakpet, Hyderabad (India), with a history of rapidly
growing painful right sided scrotal mass over his right testicle for 6 weeks. The patient received treatment for non-specific epididymo-orchitis at
another center, but regression was not observed and advised to do surgery.
On physical examination, tender mass
of the right epididymis; it is observed adhered to the testis with an irregular
surface. The overlying skin was intact with no erythema. Examination revealed
no signs of lymphadenopathy in the groin region. There were no signs of a
direct or indirect hernia. The soft prostate was palpable by digital rectal
examination, without any abnormal findings. The patient did not demonstrate any
laboratory signs of inflammation. Laboratory tests namely complete blood and
platelets counts, prothrombin time, partial and &amp;nbsp;thromboplastin levels were within normal
limits. ESR was elevated (58 mm) at the end of one hour. Urinalysis was normal. Prostate specific
antigen (PSA), alphafetoprotein, beta-human chorionic gonadotropin and lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) were within normal
ranges.Mantoux test was also negative. Chest X-ray was clear.
Scrotal
ultrasonography (USG) showed enlarged epididymis with marked heterogenous
ecotexture. Ultrasound guided FNAC was performed with needle no.23 (Figure 1a
&amp;amp; 1b).
Ultrasound guided fine needle
aspiration of right epididymis was performed with needle number 23 and scanty
yellowish pus like material was aspirated. Cytolological examination of
aspirated material by hematoxylin and eosin (H&amp;amp;E) and Pap stains revealed
caseous necrotic material, nuclear debris, histiocytes and few granulomas
consisting of epithelioid cells (Fig-2A, B &amp;amp; C). Ziehl-Neelson (ZN) stain showed many acid fast bacilli (Fig-2D). Therefore, it
was diagnosed as a case of tuberculous epididymitis. The patient was treated initially with isoniazid (INH) 300mg, Rifampin (RMP) 600mg, Pyrazinamide
(PZA) 2000mg and Ethambutol (EMB) 1200mg daily for two months. Then, INH and
RMP continued for further 6 months.
&amp;nbsp;
Fig-1a.
Enlarged epididymis (blue arrow) with
ultrasound guided needle within (red arrow); 1b. Enlarged epididymis
(arrow) with hetergenous echotexture (*).
&amp;nbsp;
Fig-2. Photomicrograph
of stained aspirated material obtained from right epididymal mass. A: H &amp;amp; E stain showing caseation necrosis, nuclear
debris (10x); B: H&amp;amp;E stain showing epithelioid cells in loose clusters (red
arrow) (10X); C: PAP stain showing granuloma (green arrow; 40x); D; ZN stain
showing positive acid fast bacilli (green arrow).
&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Discussion
Tuberculosis
is a disease, which can involve any part of male reproductive system, including
the epididymis, vas deference, seminal vesicle, prostate and least commonly the
testis. ITE is more common in
younger adults. Human immunodeficiency virus
infection may increase the risk of genitourinary TB. Kidneys are often the
primary organs infected by tubercule bacilli and then spread down the ureters into the bladder.
The infecting organism, M. tuberculosis,
reaches the epididymis by retrograde extension from the prostate and seminal
vesicles, but lymphatic and hematogeneous spread are also possible [5].
The most common clinical presentation of ITE is painful scrotal
swelling (40%), followed by scrotal sinus (20%), acute epididymo-orchitis
(10%), infertility (10%), and hematospermia (5%) [6].
Interestingly, painless scrotal mass has been
described as a common symptom in some case reports of tuberculous epididymitis
(not ITE) Irritative voiding symptoms are not as commonly associated with ITE
as they are with other genitourinary tuberculosis. ITE typically occurs
unilaterally, but a rate of bilateral involvement of 12.5% has been reported. There is no specific laboratory investigation for genitourinary
tuberculosis, especially for tuberculous epidydimitis, where urine cultures can
be negative for bacilli in half of the specimens and there are no clinical
symptoms from other organs or systems. Therefore, its diagnosis is difficult
[7].
Imaging studies may show diffuse or focal heterogeneous lesions
in the enlarged epididymis, with or without hydrocele, septation,
extra-testicular calcification, scrotal abscess, or scrotal sinus tract, which
are also common findings of other chronic inflammatory processes or testicular
tumor. A definitive diagnosis of ITE is usually based on examination of
material obtained by fine needle aspiration or surgical resection of the
epididymis [8].
In our case, ultrasound guided FNAC with smear for AFB played a
crucial role in diagnosis. It is an outpatient minimal invasive procedure and
helps in diagnosing the pathology
and nature of epididymal masses without the complication of implantation. Therefore, all
patients, especially young men with a suspected epididymo-testicular lesion
where differential diagnosis between a scrotal tumor and GUTB is particularly
difficult should be further investigated with a fine-needle aspiration.
ITE is potentially curable with anti-TB medications, consisting
of RMP, INH, EMB, and PZA. The suggested duration of therapy varies from 2
months to 2 years, although a regimen of 9 to 12 months is generally accepted.
Intratunical rifampin injection has been suggested as an effective alternative
therapy that may enable the side effects of oral therapy to be avoided [9]. According to European Urology Guidelines, treatment of uncomplicated
GUTB consists of the combination of either three anti-TB drugs (INH, RMP, EMB
or streptomycin) given daily for a period of three months followed by two drugs
(INH and RMP) for the next three months, or an initial four-drugs regimen (INH,
RMP, EMB and PZA) for two months followed by INH and RMP for four more months [10]. However, some authors recommend surgical intervention if there
is no sign of resolution within 2 months or if an intra-scrotal abscess is
identified. Surgical resection is usually reserved for those patients who do
not respond to medical therapy.
&amp;nbsp;
Conclusion
Although the
possibility of a scrotal neoplasm is high in young men presenting with swollen
testicle, a careful diagnostic work-up like minimally invasive diagnostic
approaches such as fine needle biopsy is important
to avoid unnecessary and inadvertent epididymo-orchiectomy. Clinicians should
also be aware of the case of ITE, an entity that can be cured by anti-tuberculous medications if
diagnosed in an incipient phase.
&amp;nbsp;
Competing interest: Authors declare no
conflict of interest
&amp;nbsp;
Funding: None
&amp;nbsp;
References
1.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Kapoor R, Ansari MS, Mandhani A, Gulia A.
Clinical presentation and diagnostic approach in cases of genitourinary
tuberculosis. Indian J Urol. 2008; 24: 401-405
2.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Lenk S, Schroeder J. Genitourinary
tuberculosis. Curr Opin Urol. 2001; 11: 93-98.
3.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Koss LG, Zajicek J. Aspiration biopsy. In:
Koss LG. Diagnostic cytology and histopathologic bases 4th ed. Philadelphia;
Pennsylvania; 1992: 1234-1324.
4.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Cimen F, Saka D, Ünsal E, Önal M, Ceylan T,
Atikcan
&amp;nbsp;S, &amp;nbsp;Ogretensoy &amp;nbsp;M. &amp;nbsp;A &amp;nbsp;case &amp;nbsp;of&amp;nbsp; Isolated tuberculous epididymitis. Respir Dis J. 2013; 24: 79-81.
5.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Bhargava P Epididymal tuberculosis:
Presentation and diagnosis. ANZ J Surg.
2007; 77: 495-496.
6.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Viswaroop BS, Kekre N, Gopalakrishnan G.
Isolated tuberculous epididymitis: a review of forty cases. J Postgrad Med.&amp;nbsp; 2005; 51:
109-11; discussion 111.
7.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Wolf JS Jr, McAninch JW. Tuberculous
epididymo-orchitis: diagnosis by fine needle aspiration. J Urol. 1991; 145: 836–8.
8.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Muttarak M, Peh WC, Lojanapiwat B, Chaiwun B.
Tuberculous epididymitis and epididymo-orchitis: sonographic appearances. AJR Am J
Roentgenol. 2001; 176: 1459-66.
9.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Shafik A. Treatment of tuberculous
epididymitis by intratunical rifampicin
injection. Arch Androl. 1996; 36: 239-46.
10.&amp;nbsp; Mete C, Severin L, Kurt GN, Michael CB, Truls EBJ, Botto H, et al. EAU guide- lines for the
management of genitourinary tuberculosis. Eur
Urol. 2005; 48(3): 353–62.</description>

            </item>
            
    <copyright>2026 Ibrahim Medical College. All rights reserved.</copyright>
</channel>
</rss>
