<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://imcjms.com/assets/rss.css" ?><rss version="2.0">
<channel>
    <title>IMC Journal of Medical Science</title>
    <link>https://imcjms.com</link>
    <description>Ibrahim Medical College Journal of Medical Science</description>

                        <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Status of implementation of short answer question in anatomy examination of MBBS course in Bangladesh]]></title>

                                    <author><![CDATA[Jesmin Akhter]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Sharmina Sayeed]]></author>
                
                <link data-url="https://imcjms.com/registration/journal_full_text/297">
    https://imcjms.com/registration/journal_full_text/297
</link>
                <pubDate>Sun, 19 Aug 2018 13:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
                <category><![CDATA[Original Article]]></category>
                <comments><![CDATA[IMC J Med Sci 2018; 12(2): 69-72]]></comments>
                <description>Abstract
Background
and objective:
Short answer question (SAQ) format has been introduced as a major component of
summative professional examinations of MBBS (Bachelor of Medicine and Surgery) course
in Bangladesh over a decade. No systematic evaluation has yet been conducted on
implementation of SAQ as directed in curriculum to assess the medical students
in the summative examination of MBBS course. The present study assessed the weightage
given to the different components of cognitive domain in SAQs in anatomy in first
Professional MBBS Examination under the University of Dhaka.
Materials
and method:
This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Anatomy, Ibrahim
Medical College. Anatomy SAQ papers, Paper I and Paper II, from January 2009 to
July 2014 of University of Dhaka were selected. A total of 24 SAQ papers
containing 572 questions were included in this study. Every question in a paper
was categorized as recall, understanding application types. Then the total
number of marks allocated for each of the type of questions were calculated and
compared with the total marks (98) allocated for the questions in a paper. Then
the resultant weightage of marks were compared with the curricular directive
weightage of marks allotted for SAQ.
Result: On analysis it was
found that during the period from 2009 to 2014 76.58% and 23.42% SAQ were
recall and understanding types respectively. No question was found to assess
the application component of the cognitive domain of the students.
Conclusion: The study revealed
that SAQ introduced as an assessment tool in undergraduate medical curriculum
was not properly implemented and its desired objectives were not fully
achieved.
IMC J Med Sci 2018; 12(2): 69-72. EPub
date: 19 August 2018.&amp;nbsp;DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/imcjms.v12i2.39663  
Address for Correspondence: Dr. Jesmin Akhter, Associate Professor,
Department of Anatomy, Ibrahim Medical College, 1/A, Ibrahim Sarani,
Segunbagicha, Dhaka, Bangladesh. E mail: jesminakhterlina@gmail.com
&amp;nbsp;
Introduction 
Assessment is an educational tool to evaluate students and to
understand how successfully the learning materials are delivered to the
learners. It also serves to motivate and help students to structure their
academic efforts [1].&amp;nbsp;Principle of assessment in medical education is to provide
direction and motivation for future learning and protect the health of the public
by upholding high professional standards [2]. Learning abilities must be assessed
in multiple modes and contexts. In addition,goodassessmentcanhelpstudentsbecome
more effective self-directed learners [3].
This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department
of Anatomy, Ibrahim Medical College. SAQ question papers on anatomy of first
professional MBBS course (Paper I and Paper II), from January 2009 to July 2014
held under the University of Dhaka were selected. In first professional MBBS
examination, the summative examinations on anatomy are held twice a year. A
total of 24 SAQ papers were included in this study. In each paper there were Group
A (35 marks) and Group B (35 marks). In each group there were seven (07)
questions with or without multiple segments to assess different components of
cognitive domain. Each question carried 07 marks. So, in each group 49 marks
were allocated for 07 questions and in a paper with two groups, the total marks
allocated for 14 questions were 98. Therefore, a total of 572 questions were
included in the study, 281 questions from Paper I and 291 questions from Paper
II. Every segment of the questions in a paper was categorized as recall,
understanding or application types as described elsewhere [9]. Then the total
number of marks allocated for each of the type of questions in a paper were
calculated and compared with the total marks (98) allocated for the questions
in a paper. Then the resultant weightage of marks were compared with the
curricular directive weightage of marks allocated for respective component of cognitive
domains. The curriculum recommended mark was 70% for recall, 20% for
understanding and 10% for application types of questions [8].
&amp;nbsp;
Results
&amp;nbsp;
</description>

            </item>
            
    <copyright>2026 Ibrahim Medical College. All rights reserved.</copyright>
</channel>
</rss>
