<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://imcjms.com/assets/rss.css" ?><rss version="2.0">
<channel>
    <title>IMC Journal of Medical Science</title>
    <link>https://imcjms.com</link>
    <description>Ibrahim Medical College Journal of Medical Science</description>

                        <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Factors associated with non-response to lactulose therapy in cirrhotic patients with minimal hepatic encephalopathy]]></title>

                                    <author><![CDATA[Shireen Ahmed]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Md. Golam Azam]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Indrajit Kumar Datta]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Md. Nazmul Hoque]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[Tareq M Bhuiyan]]></author>
                
                <link data-url="https://imcjms.com/registration/journal_full_text/231">
    https://imcjms.com/registration/journal_full_text/231
</link>
                <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2017 12:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
                <category><![CDATA[Original Article]]></category>
                <comments><![CDATA[IMC J Med Sci 2018; 12(1): 15-21]]></comments>
                <description>Abstract
Background and objectives:
Minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) impairs health related quality of life and
predicts overt hepatic encephalopathy (HE) in cirrhotic patients. Lactulose is
effective in the treatment of MHE. But the response to lactulose treatment
depends on several factors. This study was aimed to find out the contributing
factors to non-response to lactulose therapy.
Materials and methods: The study was carried out at the BIRDEM general hospital from September,
2013 to March, 2015. Sixty patients were enrolled to assess the response of
lactulose therapy in cirrhotic patients with MHE. MHE was diagnosed based on abnormal
psychometric tests namely, number connection test (NCT), digit symbol test
(DST) and high serum ammonia level. A daily dose of 30-60 ml of lactulose was given to
all patients for one month. The response to treatment with regard to MHE was
determined after one month using
defined criteria. The response was graded as responder and non-responder. 
Results: The mean age of the study
population was 57.0±10.3 years. Out of 60 cases, 46 (77%) were male and 39
(65%) had diabetes. Out of 60 enrolled MHE cases, 16 (27%) had Child-Turcotte-Pugh-A
(CTP-A) score and 44 (73%) belonged to CTP-B &amp;amp; C category. 
Out of 60 MHE cases, 23 (38.3%) showed
improvement in their MHE status based on normalization of psychometric
tests and reduction of serum ammonia level to ≤32 µmol/L. Age,
gender and diabetes were not associated with the response to lactulose therapy.
Low baseline arterial pressure was significantly
(p=0.003) associated with non-response to lactulose treatment. The mean
baseline ammonia level was higher significantly among the non-responders
compared to the responders (83.6±21.4 µmol/L vs 58.8±19.8 µmol/L, p&amp;lt;0.001). Compared to
responders, low serum sodium and potassium and raised serum bilirubin levels of
non-responders at baseline were found significantly (p&amp;lt;0.05) associated with
non-response to one month of lactulose treatment. Initial hemoglobulin,
peripheral leucocyte and platelet counts did not have any effect on the
response to lactulose treatment in MHE cases. 
Conclusions:The status of MHE in patients with
cirrhosis improved by one-month treatment with lactulose. Baseline low arterial
pressure, hyperammonemia, hypokalemia and hyponatremia were major contributors
to non-response to lactulose therapy. The findings of the study would be useful
in treating patients of cirrhosis with MHE.
IMC J Med Sci 2018; 12(1): 15-21.&amp;nbsp;DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/imcjms.v12i1.35172  
Address for
Correspondence: Dr. Shireen Ahmed, Registrar, Department
of Gastroenterology Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Disorders, BIRDEM General
Hospital, 122 Kazi Nazrul Islam Avenue, Dhaka, Bangladesh. E-mail:
a.alwasi15@gmail.com
&amp;nbsp;
Introduction
Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is defined as a spectrum of neuropsychiatric
abnormalities in patients with liver dysfunction, after exclusion of other
known brain disease. Hepatic encephalopathy is characterized by personality
changes, intellectual impairment, and a
depressed level of consciousness. An important prerequisite for the
syndrome is diversion of portal blood into the systemic circulation through porto-systemic collateral vessels [1]. The
development of hepatic encephalopathy negatively impacts patient survival. The survival
probability of patients with HE requiring hospitalization has been reported to be
42% at 1 year of follow-up and 23% at 3
years. Approximately, 30% of patients dying of end-stage liver disease
experience significant encephalopathy [2]. The economic burden of hepatic
encephalopathy is substantial. After ascites, hepatic encephalopathy is the
second most common reason for hospitalization of cirrhotic patients in the
United States [3]. &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;Apart from HE, a
considerable number of patients with cirrhosis also develop minimum hepatic
encephalopathy (MHE). MHEis a condition in patients with cirrhosis of the liver,
who has &amp;nbsp;normal mental and neurological
status on standard clinical examination while exhibit a number of
neuropsychiatric and neurophysiological defects [4]. The prevalence of MHE
varies from 30 to 70% in cirrhotic patients without overt hepatic
encephalopathy [5,6,7]. MHE is associated with increased progression to HE and
diminished quality of life [6,7]. Hence, psychometric tests are recommended to
screen patients with cirrhosis for detecting MHE. 
The diagnostic
criteria for MHE rest on careful patient history, physical examination, normal
mental status examination, demonstration
of abnormalities in cognition and/or
neurophysiological function, and
exclusion of concomitant neurological disorders [8]. MHE is considered
clinically relevant for at least three reasons. It impairs patient’s daily
functioning and health-related quality of life [9,10]. Second, it predicts the
development of overt HE. Finally, it is associated with a poor prognosis [11]. In
a variety of psychometric tests listed in the medical literature, DST and NCT
part A were reported to have the advantages of simplicity and reliability [4]. 
Gut-derived
nitrogenous substances are universally acknowledged to play a major role in the
pathogenesis of hepatic encephalopathy. Pathogenesis of MHE is thought to be
similar to that of overt HE. Specifically, ammonia is thought to be a critical
factor in the pathogenesis [12]. Altered glio-neuronal communication as a
result of low grade astrocyte swelling found in HE,
have been noticed in patients with MHE and is the basis of new
diagnostic tests for detecting MHE like critical flicker frequency and magnetic
resonance spectroscopy [13].
Presently, lactulose
is the mainstay of treatment for MHE [14,15]. Lactulose is metabolized into
lactic and acetic acids, which results in acidification&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; of the gastrointestinal lumen. Gastrointestinal acidification
ultimately inhibits the production of ammonia by coliform bacteria. Lactulose
also acts as a cathartic. The typical dosage of lactulose is 30 ml 2–4 times
per day, adjusted to achieve two to four soft stools/day [16]. Lactulose has
been shown to improve cognitive function and health-related quality of life in
patients with MHE [9]. A recent study has attributed lack of response to
lactulose treatment in cirrhotic patients with MHE to low serum sodium levels
and high serum ammonia levels [17]. However, not all patients with MHE respond
to lactulose and the efficacy of lactulose varies from 40 to 70% in various
studies [17]. In view of the above, the present study was aimed to evaluate the
contributing factors of non-response to lactulose treatment in cirrhotic
patients with MHE.
&amp;nbsp;
Methodology
This prospective, longitudinal study was
conducted to find the contributors to non-response to lactulose therapy in
patients of MHE with cirrhosis of &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;liver
at the Department of Gastroenterology Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Disorders,
BIRDEM General Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh from September, 2013 to March 2015. The
study was approved by the Ethical Review Committee (ERC) of Diabetic Association
of Bangladesh (BADAS). Cases were selected
by purposive sampling technique and informed written consent was obtained.
Patients of cirrhosis of liver, aged &amp;gt;18
years, having MHE with normal mental status with no
history of taking lactulose and any antibiotics in the past 12 weeks were included in this study. Normal mental status was assessed by mini
mental state examination (MMSE score ≥24) [18] and MHE was diagnosed by abnormal psychometric tests (NCT-B
&amp;gt;30 second and DST &amp;gt;90 second including the error correction time) and raised serum ammonia (≥32 µmol/L) [4]. Cirrhosis was diagnosed based on clinical features, laboratory
parameters, abdominal ultrasonography and endoscopic findings.
The&amp;nbsp;mini–mental
state examination&amp;nbsp;(MMSE)&amp;nbsp;is a brief 30-point questionnaire test used
to screen for cognitive impairment. It is also used to estimate the severity of
cognitive impairment and to follow the course of cognitive changes in an
individual over time, thus making it an effective way to document an
individual&#039;s response to treatment. If the score is found ≥24
then it denotes that the person has normal mental status [18]. NCT-Bis a test of visuo-spatial
orientation and psychomotor speed. The subject is shown a sheet of paper with
25 numbered circles which are randomly spread over the paper. The task is to
connect the circles from 1-25 within 30 seconds. Test result is the time needed
by the subject including error correction time [19]. In DST, the subject is
given a series of double-boxes with a number given in the upper part. The task
is to draw a symbol pertinent to this number into the lower part of the boxes.
Nine fixed pairs of numbers and symbols are given at the top of the test sheet.
Test result is the number of boxes correctly filled within 90 seconds.
Pathological test results indicate a deficit in visuo-constructive abilities
[20].
Cirrhotic patients who had HE or a history of HE within last three
month, history of taking lactulose, any antibiotics,
antidepressants, sedatives, prokinetic and
antispasmodic drugs, alcohol intake, gastrointestinal
hemorrhage or spontaneous bacterial peritonitis during the past 12
weeks, previous transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt or shunt surgery,
significant co-morbid illness such as heart, respiratory or renal failure,
neurological diseases such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, non-hepatic
metabolic encephalopathy, colour blindness, mature cataract, diabetic
retinopathy, were excluded from the study.
Lactulose was given to all patients with the
dose of 30-60 ml daily for one month and ensured that stool passed 2-3 times
per day. Patients on diuretics and beta blocker for ascites or edema and esophageal
varix continued the maintenance dose. All patients receiving lactulose were
followed up after one month and assessed for the response of lactulose. Response
to lactulose on the status of MHE was determined after one month by NCT-B, DST and
serum ammonia level. Response was graded as responders and non-responders to
lactulose therapy. Responder was defined as cases with normalization
of psychometric tests and reduction of serum ammonia
level to≤32 µmol/L, while non-responder was cases with abnormal
psychometric tests and no reduction or increased serum ammonia. Responder and non-responder groups were compared to find the
contributing factors to non-response to lactulose treatment. Also, Child-Turcotte-Pugh
(CTP) and Model for End Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scorings were used to compare the prognostic status of responder
and non-responder to lactulose therapy [21]. CTP score was determined as
described in Table-1 and MELD score was calculated by the formula: [3.8{in S.
bilirubin (mg/dl)} +11.20 (in INR) +9.3 {in serum creatinine (mg/dl)} + 6.4]. Data
was analyzed by chi-square and student’s t-tests, where applicable. 
&amp;nbsp;
Results
The study aimed to assess
the response to lactulose therapy in patients of cirrhosis of liver with MHE.
Total 60 patients were enrolled in the study. The mean age of participants was 57.0±10.3 years. Out of 60 cases, 46 (77%) were
male and 39 (65%) had diabetes. Hepatitis B virus was positive in 13 (22%) cases
while 9 (15%) had hepatitis C virus. Out of 60 enrolled cases, 16 (27%) had
CTP-A score and 44 (73%) belonged to CTP-B &amp;amp; C category (Table-2).
Of the 60 MHE cases, 37 (61.7%) were
non-responders to one-month lactulose treatment while remaining 23 (38.3%) were
responders based on normalization of psychometric tests and
reduction of serum ammonia level to ≤32 µmol/L. Age,
gender and diabetes were not associated with the response to lactulose therapy
(Table-2). The mean baseline arterial pressure was significantly
(p=0.003) low in non-responders (76.0±10.6 mmHg) than that of responders (84.5±9.9
mmHg). The mean baseline ammonia level was higher significantly among the
non-responders compared to the responders (83.6±21.4 µmol/L vs 58.8±19.8 µmol/L,
p&amp;lt;0.001). The mean serum ammonia level reduced significantly among the
responders (21.2±5.5 µmol/L) after one month of lactulose therapy while it
remained high in non-responders (88.8±17.7 µmol/L). The level remained about
four times higher in non-responders on follow up after one month. 
&amp;nbsp;
Table-1: Child-Turcotte-Pugh
score
&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Table-2: Baseline
demographic, clinical and biochemical parameters contributing response to
lactulose treatment in MHE patients (n=60)
&amp;nbsp;
&amp;nbsp;
Compared to responders, low serum sodium and
potassium and raised serum bilirubin levels of non-responders at baseline were
found significantly (p&amp;lt;0.05) associated with non-response to one month of
lactulose treatment (Table-2). Initial hemoglobulin, leucocyte and platelets as
well as other biochemical parameters mentioned in Table-2 did not have any
effect on the response to lactulose treatment in MHE cases. 
&amp;nbsp;
Discussion
MHE is a well-recognized cause of diminished quality
of life and predisposes overt HE. Oral lactulose therapy is a treatment option
for MHE. But some patients do not respond to lactulose. This prospective study
was carried out to assess the response of lactulose therapy in patients with
cirrhosis and MHE. In
this study, sixty patients having cirrhosis of liver and MHE were included.
This study showed more than half of the patients were non-responder to
lactulose 37 (61.7%). It was assumed that non-responders could be less if
patients could be followed up for longer duration with lactulose therapy. MHE reversed in 64.5% patients when treated with lactulose for three
months [9].
In this study, it was found that the higher
CTP score and low mean arterial pressure (MAP) as contributing factors to
non-response to lactulose. As reported earlier, the present study showed that
advance liver disease had less chance to response to lactulose therapy [22]. Splanchnic
and systemic arterial vasodilatation is a hallmark of the progression of portal
hypertension in patients with cirrhosis and
leads to decreased effective circulating blood volume and ultimately to
a decrease in blood pressure as well as MAP. This process is mediated by a
number of endogenous substances, including nitric oxide (NO), carbon monoxide (CO),
glucagon, prostacyclin, adrenomedullin, and endogenous opiates that are
released or act locally in the vasculature in response to mechanical and
inflammatory signals [23,24].
Hyperammonemia, hyponatremia, hypokalemia as
well as increased bilirubin were found as predictors of non-response to
lactulose treatment. Different
studies also demonstrated that hyperammonemia, serum sodium concentration
&amp;lt;135 mmol/L and serum potassium level of &amp;lt;4 mmol/L were associated with greater frequency of
hepatic encephalopathy as well as minimal hepatic encephalopathy and reduced
response to lactulose therapy [17,25,26]. Different factors are responsible for
development of hepatic encephalopathy. These factors include the
production of neurotoxins, altered permeability of the blood brain barrier, and
abnormal neurotransmission. Ammonia is the best-described neurotoxin involved
in HE. It is produced primarily in the colon, where bacteria metabolize
proteins and other nitrogen-based products into ammonia. Enterocytes synthesize
ammonia from glutamine [27,28,29].
Once
produced, ammonia enters the portal circulation and, under normal conditions,
is metabolized and cleared by hepatocytes. In cirrhosis and portal
hypertension, reduced hepatocyte function and portosystemic shunting contribute
to increased circulating ammonia levels. Acute hyperammonemia has direct effect
on brain edema, astrocyte swelling, and the transport of neurally active
compounds, thus contributing to HE [30,31,32]. Hyponatremia and hypokalemia are
risk factor for hepatic encephalopathy as well as MHE, so if the levels are
more reduced then the response to lactulose therapy is also decreased [25,26].
High baseline total leukocyte counts and
creatinine level, and low platelet count have been reported to associated with
nonresponse to lactulose [33]. However, this study failed to find any
significant influence of these parameters with non-response to lactulose
therapy (Table 2). This different outcome might be due to small sample size and
different patient selection criteria.
The
present study evaluated the contributing factors to non-response to oral
lactulose therapy in cirrhotic patients with MHE. On analysis, baseline low
MAP, high CTP score, low serum sodium and potassium levels, increased serum
bilirubin and hyperammonemia were found to be associated with non-response to
lactulose therapy.
&amp;nbsp;
SA was involved in study design, data collection, literature review, data
analysis and manuscript writing. MGA was involved in study design, statistical
analysis and manuscript writing. IKD and MNH was involved in literature review
and manuscript writing. TMB was involved in editing and final approval of the
manuscript.
&amp;nbsp;
Authors declare no conflict
of interest.
Funding
None
&amp;nbsp;
References
1.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Ferenci
P, Lockwood A, Mullen K, Tarter R, Weissenborn K, Blei AT. Hepatic
encephalopathy- definition, nomenclature and quantification: final report of
the working party at the 11th World Congresses of Gastroenterology, Vienna,
1998. Hepatology. 2002; 35(3): 716–721.
2.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Das
A, Dhiman RK, Saraswat VA, Verma M, Naik SR. Prevalence and natural history of
subclinical hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhosis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2001; 16(5):
531–535.
3.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Groeneweg
M, Moerland W, Quero JC, Hop WC, Krabbe PF, Schalm SW. Screening of subclinical
hepatic encephalopathy. J Hepatol.
2000; 32(5): 748–753.
4.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Saxena N, Bhatia M, Joshi YK, Garg PK, Dwivedi SN, Tandon RK. Electrophysiological and neuropsychological
tests for the diagnosis of subclinical hepatic encephalopathy and prediction of
overt encephalopathy. Liver Int.
2002; 22(3): 190–197.
5.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Groeneweg
M, Quero JC, De Bruijn I, Hartmann I, Essink-bot MI, Hop WCJ, et al. Subclinical
hepatic encephalopathy impairs daily functioning. Hepatology. 1998; 28(1):
45–49.
6.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Marchesini
G, Bianchi G, Amodio P, Salerno F, Merli M, Panella C, et al. Italian Study Group for Quality of Life in Cirrhosis.
Factors associated with poor health-related quality of life of patients with cirrhosis. Gastroenterology.
2001; 120(1): 170–178.
7.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Schomerus
H, Hamster W. Quality of life in cirrhotics
with minimal hepatic encephalopathy. Metab
Brain Dis. 2001; 16(1): 37–41.
9.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Prasad S, Dhiman RK, Duseja A, Chawla YK,
Sharma A, Agarwal R. Lactulose improves cognitive function and health-related
quality of life in cirrhotic patients with minimal hepatic encephalopathy. Hepatology. 2007; 45(3): 549–559.
11.&amp;nbsp; Cash WJ, Mc Conville P, McDermott E, McCormick
PA, Callender ME, McDougall NI. Current concepts in the assessment and
treatment of hepatic encephalopathy. Q J Med. 2010; 103(1): 9–16.
13.&amp;nbsp; Sharma P, Sharma BC, Puri V, Sarin SK. Critical
flicker frequency: diagnostic tool for minimal hepatic encephalopathy. J Hepatol. 2007; 47(1): 67–73.
15.&amp;nbsp; Watanabe
A, Sakai T, Sato S, Imai F, Ohto M, Arakawa Y, et al. Clinical efficacy of lactulose in cirrhotic patients with and without subclinical
hepatic encephalopathy. Hepatology. 1997; 26(6): 1410–14.
</description>

            </item>
            
    <copyright>2026 Ibrahim Medical College. All rights reserved.</copyright>
</channel>
</rss>
