<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://imcjms.com/assets/rss.css" ?><rss version="2.0">
<channel>
    <title>IMC Journal of Medical Science</title>
    <link>https://imcjms.com</link>
    <description>Ibrahim Medical College Journal of Medical Science</description>

                        <item>
                <title><![CDATA[Humoral immune response to selective mycobacterial antigens and serodiagnosis of active tuberculosis in Bangladeshi patients]]></title>

                                    <author><![CDATA[Md. Mohiuddin]]></author>
                                    <author><![CDATA[J. Ashraful Haq]]></author>
                
                <link data-url="https://imcjms.com/registration/journal_full_text/154">
    https://imcjms.com/registration/journal_full_text/154
</link>
                <pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2016 17:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
                <category><![CDATA[Original Article]]></category>
                <comments><![CDATA[IMC J Med Sci 2016; 10(2): 53-57]]></comments>
                <description>Background and objective: Serological
test has become an important tool in the diagnosis of TB cases. This study focused on the analysis and comparison of antibody response
to two Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) antigens namely Ag85
complex and culture filtrate protein (CFP) in patients with tuberculosis. Antibody
response to specific antigen was utilized as a diagnostic tool to detect active
tuberculosis (TB) cases.
Results:&amp;nbsp;The mean OD values of serum IgM and IgG antibodies against Ag85 and CFP
were significantly (p&amp;lt;0.0001) higher in patients than that of healthy
control individuals. Among the 30 tuberculosis patients, anti-Ag85 complex IgM
and IgG was positive in 66.7% and 70.0% patients respectively. The seropositive
rate of anti-CFP IgM and IgG was 33.3% and 56.7% respectively. The sensitivity
and specificity of anti Ag85 and anti-CFP IgM and IgG ranged from 60.0% to
96.7%. 
IMC J Med Sci 2016; 10(2): 53-57.&amp;nbsp;DOI: https://doi.org/10.3329/imcjms.v10i2.31111  
&amp;nbsp;
Tuberculosis (TB) caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis(MTB) is one of the leading cause of morbidity and death in the
world. In 2015, there were about 10.4 million new TB cases worldwide and 1.4 million
deaths from TB [1]. The estimated annual incidence of TB in Bangladesh is 0.362
million cases [1]. Early diagnosis and treatment of TB patients is crucial for
the control of TB [2]. In developing countries, current diagnosis of TB largely
relies on clinical symptoms, radiographic evidence supported by presence of acid
fast bacilli in smear and isolation of MTB by culture from the clinical
specimen. Direct smear is fast and cheap method but it lacks sensitivity. Culture
method is more sensitive but it is cumbersome and requires longer incubation
period. In the recent years, the detection of MTB-specific antibodies has become important diagnostic aid
in the diagnosis of TB especially in smear-negative sputum cases [3]. It is particularly important for pediatric and extra pulmonary
tuberculosis and in those unable to produce sputum. Thus
the antibody assay might be of great benefit for early diagnosis and control of
TB.
Serological methods have been regarded as
attractive tools for rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis due to their simplicity,
rapidity and low cost. Serodiagnosis also does not require safety measures
associated with handling of live bacilli as in culture and offer the
possibility of detecting cases often missed by routine sputum smear microscopy.
It is estimated that a rapid and widely available diagnostic assay with 85%
sensitivity and 95% specificity would result in 400,000 fewer deaths each year
and would greatly reduce the global health cost of TB [7].
Materials and methods

Study population: Study included thirty adult confirmed active pulmonary tuberculosis
cases. Active TB cases were confirmed by clinical features, positive AFB sputum
and culture. Age and sex matched thirty healthy individuals were enrolled in
the study as healthy control. All the healthy individuals were BCG vaccinated
and neither they nor any of their family members had history or any sign
symptoms of tuberculosis. About 5 ml of blood was collected from each
participant with aseptic precautions by venipuncture. The serum was immediately
separated and stored at -200C until used.
Interpretation of the result: The concentration of antibody was expressed in OD at a particular
dilution of both patient and healthy control samples. In order to diagnose
active tuberculosis cases by detecting IgM and IgG antibody response against
specific antigens, a cut off OD value was determined by the following formula:
Cut off OD value= Mean antibody (IgM/IgG) titer of healthy participants
against specific antigen +2xSD. 
Any OD value above the cut off was considered as positive for respective
antibodies. Significance of difference of mean OD value of IgM and IgG
antibodies against respective antigens was calculated by independent student’s
t test. 
&amp;nbsp;
Results 
Antibody
response to Ag85 complex and CFP was determined in sera of 30 confirmed cases
of tuberculosis and 30 healthy individuals. IgM and IgG response against
specific antigens were determined by ELISA method and concentration of
antibodies was expressed in terms of OD value. Table-1 shows the antibody
response to two mycobacterial antigens. It was observed that mean OD values of
serum IgM and IgG antibodies against Ag85 complex and CFP were significantly
higher in patients (p&amp;lt;0.0001) than that of healthy control subjects.
&amp;nbsp;
Table-1: Antibody
response to different MTB antigens in tuberculosis and healthy participants
&amp;nbsp;
1.18±0.10
  
  
  0.78±0.10
  
  
  0.56±0.03
  
  
  0.39±0.03
  
  
  0.0001
  
  
  0.0004
  
  
  
 
  
  Antigen
  
  
  Mean serum OD±SD of
  healthy individuals for
  
  
  Cut off OD value
  (Mean OD +2xSD)
  
 
 
  
  IgM
  
  
  IgG
  
  
  IgM
  
  
  IgG
  
 
 
  
  Ag85 complex
  
  
  0.56±0.16
  
  
  0.87±0.39
  
  
  0.88
  
  
  1.66
  
 
 
  
  CFP
  
  
  0.57±0.39
  
  
  1.36
  
 

Note: Cut off OD
values were calculated from antibody response in healthy individuals.
&amp;nbsp;
Table-3 shows
the seropositive cases of tuberculosis patients by detecting IgM and IgG
antibodies against Ag85 complex and CFP antigens. It was observed that among
the total number of 30 tuberculosis patients, anti-Ag85 complex IgM was
positive in 66.7% patients and its sensitivity and specificity was 75.0% and 96.7%
respectively. The anti-Ag85 complex IgG was positive in 70.0% of patients and its
sensitivity and specificity was 76.9% and 93.75% respectively. The seropositive
rate of anti-CFP IgM and IgG was 33.3% and 56.7% while the sensitivity and
specificity was 60.0% and 96.7% respectively.
&amp;nbsp;
Table-3: Serodiagnosis of tuberculosis patients by
detecting IgM and IgG antibodies against Ag 85 complex and CFP antigens
&amp;nbsp;
Sensitivity (%)
  
  
  1.&amp;nbsp; World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2016. Geneva:
World health organization; 2016. 214 p.
3.&amp;nbsp; Wu X, Yang Y, Zhang
J, Li B, Lian Y, Zhang C, Dong M. Comparison of antibody responses to seventeen
antigens from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Clin Chim Acta 2010; 411(19-20):
1520–1528. doi:
10.1016/j.cca.2010.06.014
5.&amp;nbsp; Demissie A, Leyten
EM, Abebe M, Wassie L, Aseffa A, Abate G, et al. Recognition of stage specific
mycobacterial antigens differentiates between acute and latent infections with Mycobacterium
tuberculosis. Clin Vaccine Immunol
2006; 13(2):179–186.
10.&amp;nbsp; Xueqiong
Wu, Yang Y, Zhang J, Li B, Liang Y, Zhang C, Dong M, Cheng H, He J. Humoral
immune responses against the Mycobacterium
tuberculosis 38-Kilodalton, MTB48 and CFP10/ESAT-6 antigens in
tuberculosis. Clin Vaccine Immunol 2010;
17(3): 372-375.
11.&amp;nbsp; Prabha C, Jalapathy KV, Das
SD. Humoral immune response in tuberculous pleuritis. Am J Immunol 2005; 1(2):
68-73.
13.&amp;nbsp; Voller A, Bartlett A,
Bidwell DE. Enzyme immunoassays with special reference to ELISA techniques. J Clin Path 1978; 31:
507-520.
14.&amp;nbsp; Suraiya S, Musa M, Suppian R, Haq JA
.Serological diagnosis for active tuberculosis in Malayasian population:
comparison for four protein candidate. Asian
Pac J Trop Dis 2012; 2: S312-S315.</description>

            </item>
            
    <copyright>2026 Ibrahim Medical College. All rights reserved.</copyright>
</channel>
</rss>
