IMC Journal
IMC Journal
IMCJMS


Abstract (823)  Download PDF (881) Print
Issue: Vol.4 No.2 - July2010
Age related volume of cadaver-prostates in Bangladesh
Authors:
Rukshana Ahmed
Rukshana Ahmed
Affiliations

Department of Anatomy, Dhaka Medical College, Dhaka, Bangladesh

,
Shamim Ara
Shamim Ara
Affiliations

Department of Anatomy, Dhaka Medical College, Dhaka, Bangladesh

Abstract

Pathological changes in the prostate gland occur commonly with advancing age including inflammation, atrophy, hyperplasia and carcinoma and a change in volume is also evident. Estimation of volume of prostate may be useful in a variety of clinical settings. A cross-sectional descriptive study was designed to see the changes in volume of the prostate with advancing age and done in the Department of Anatomy, Dhaka Medical College, Dhaka from August 2006 to June 2007. The study was performed on 70 post-mortem human prostates collected from the unclaimed dead bodies that were under examination in the Department of Forensic Medicine, Dhaka Medical College, Dhaka. The samples were divided into three age groups; group A (10-20 years), group B (21-40 years) and group C (41-70 years). Volume of the sample was measured by using the ellipsoid formula. The mean ± SD volume of prostate was 7.68 ± 3.64 cm3 in group A, 10.61 ± 3.99 cm3 in group B and 15.40 ± 6.31 cm3 in group C. Mean difference in volume between group A and group C, group B and group C were statistically significant (p<0.001). Statistically significant positive correlation was found between age and volume of prostate (r = + 0.579, p < 0.001).

Ibrahim Med. Coll. J. 2010; 4(2): 74-77

Key Words: Prostate, volume, Bangladeshi.

Address for Correspondence:Dr. Rukshana Ahmed, Lecturer, Department of Anatomy, Dhaka Medical College, Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh. E-mail: [email protected]

 

Introduction

The prostate is partly glandular; partly fibro muscular organ.1 It is the largest accessory sex gland in the male reproductive system.2 It produces a thin milky fluid containing citric acid and acid phosphatase that is added to the seminal fluid at the time of ejaculation.3 Pathological process in prostate gland occurs commonly in association with aging and includes inflammation, atrophy, hyperplasia and carcinoma.4 Estimation of volume of prostate may be useful in a variety of clinical settings. For example, a precise estimate of the amount of BPH would help to determine the appropriate therapy as well as assist in the interpretation of serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels for the presence of cancer. Also the decrease in prostate mass after hormonal manipulation or radiation therapy can be used as an indicator of therapeutic efficacy.5 Also for PSA density determination accurate volume measurement is necessary.6 The effect of prostate volume on biopsy outcome was assessed and noted that there was an inverse relationship between the size of the gland and prostate cancer. When the gland size was less than 40 ml, 17 had prostate cancer and when more than 40 ml, only 7 were found to have prostate cancer. 7 The changes in prostate size i.e. volume are highly variable among aging men. Although benign prostatic hyperplasia with an increase in volume is very common, a considerable portion of aging men have a stable or decreasing prostate size.8 With the above perspectives, the volume of the prostate was thought to be of great value for diagnosis and treatment of various diseases of the prostate. As data on the volume of the prostrate in Bangladeshi males are scarce, this study was conducted, albeit on cadavers, to achieve the same.

 

Materials & Methods

Human prostate samples were collected from unclaimed dead bodies which were under examination in the Department of Forensic Medicine of Dhaka Medical College, Dhaka from August 2006 to April 2007. After legal formalities, the samples were collected from the medico-legal cases within 24-36 hours of death prior to signs of putrefaction. During collection, appropriate age and cause of death were noted from the morgue’s record book. The samples were brought to the Department of Anatomy, Dhaka Medical College, Dhaka. The samples were tagged immediately, which was bearing a code number for subsequent identification. Soon after collection, each sample was gently washed in tap water on a dissection tray. Blood and blood clots were removed as far as possible. The samples were fixed in 10% formol saline solution and divided into three groups (Table 1), according to Begum (1991).9 This research work was approved by the Ethical Review Committee of Dhaka Medical College, Dhaka.

 

Measurement of volume:

Volume of the prostate was measured by applying ellipsoid formula which requires measurement of three prostatic dimensions. Dimensions were first determined in the axial plane by measuring the transverse and antero-posterior dimensions at the estimated point of widest transverse dimension. The longitudinal dimension was measured in the sagittal plane. The ellipsoid volume formula10 was then applied as follows:

Volume = height × width × length × 0.52

The volumes were expressed in mean with standard deviation (SD) and comparison among the different age groups was made using ANOVA. The correlation coefficient was used to determine the association between age and volume of prostate. The SPSS version 11.0 was used.

 

Results

The mean ± SD volume of prostate was 7.68 ± 3.64 cm3 in group A, 10.61 ± 3.99 cm3 in group B and 15.40 ± 6.31 cm3 in group C. The highest mean ± SD was in group C and lowest in group A. Mean difference in volume between group A and group C, group B and group C were statistically significant (p <0.001). Statistically the difference between group A and group B was not significant (Table 1). Positive correlation was present between age and volume of prostate which was also statistically significant (r = + 0.579, p < 0.001; Fig 1).

 

Fig-2: Scatter diagram showing relationship between age and volume of prostate


Table 1: Volumes of prostate according to age group

 

 

Discussion

Moore11 studied 129 individuals aged between 20 to 90 years. He found that the volume of prostate was 10.22 ± 1.09 cm3, 11.72 ± 0.799 cm3, 10.88 ± 0.788 cm3, 12.03 ± 0.804 cm3, 12.06 ± 1.01 cm3, 11.94 ± 1.11 cm3 and 13.70 ± 1.39 cm3 in 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th and 9th decades respectively. This finding was compatible with the present study. Jakobsen, Torp-Padersen and Juul12 examined patients between 30 and 50 years and observed their mean prostate volume between 23.9 to 25.7 ml. Gearhart et al.13 observed that the mean prostatic volume was 20.7 ± 8.2 cm3. Benaim et al.14 studied a series of 100 men aged 40-80 years and found the prostatic volume ranged from 22.1 to 41.5 ml. Chicharro-Molero et al.15 observed 1104 men older than 40 years in a Spanish community and found the volume ranged from 23.4 to 41.9 ml. Zackrisson, Hugosson and Aus16 found that prostatic volume was 19.2 ± 4 cm3 in men aged 20-29 years and 35 ± 12.5 cm3 for men aged 60-69 years. Overland et al.17 studied 611 Norwegian men aged 60-69 years and found the volume ranging from 26.5 to 31 ml. Loeba et al.8 studied serial pelvic magnetic resonance imaging performed in 278 men without prostate cancer and found that the median age was 58 years and median prostate size was 28 cm3 at study entry. At a median follow up of 4.3 years prostate size increased in 61.9% and remained stable or decreased in 38.1% of men. The median rate of volume change was 0.6 cm3 per year (range: 9.9 to 62.1 cm3), corresponding to a median growth rate of 2.5% per year (range: 29.2 to 176.4%). During follow up 64.6% of men with an initial prostate size less than 40 cm3 had prostate growth compared to only 50.9% of men with an initial prostate size of 40 cm3 or greater. These findings12-17 were also of a higher value than that of the present study. The discrepancy may be due to the fact that the present study was conducted on the formalin fixed viscera of the cadaver subjects resulting in a shrinkage and giving a lower value; whereas, the higher prostate volume reported by others were undertaken either by imaging or after excision of living bodies. Another important point may be that most of the study samples were collected from the autopsied bodies of road traffic accidents causing a massive blood loss, hypovolumic shock, reduced tissue perfusion and volume reduction. Moreover, racial variation may contribute to the smaller size of the prostate. Compared with the developed or western people Bangladeshis have a lower body mass index and likely to have lower sized body organs including that of the prostate.

 

Conclusion

The present study showed the volume of the prostate according to the age group. It revealed – more is the age larger is the volume. The age group only over 40 years had a significantly larger prostate, indicating a significant increase in prostate size only in the aging male Bangladeshi population. Further studies may be undertaken in living humans with a view – a) to determine the prostate volume of different age group; b) to delineate the age when the prostate starts increasing in size and c) to identify the risk factors related to enlarged prostate both benign and malignant.

 

Acknowledgement

We acknowledge Directorate General of Health Services (DGHS), Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh for the research grant through the HNPSP. We are also grateful to Dr Md Motahar Hossain, Prof of Anatomy, IMC; Dr Abu Sadat Md Nurunnabi, Lecturer in Anatomy, DMC; Dr Sabiha Mahbub, Asst Prof of Anatomy, TMMC, Gazipur for their help in this work.

 

References

1.   Sinnatamby CS. Last’s Anatomy: regional and applied. 11th ed. London: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone; 2006; 309-10.

2.   Ross MH, Pawlina W. Histology: a text and atlas with correlated cell and molecular biology. 5thed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006; 752-6.

3.   Snell RS. Clinical anatomy by regions. 8th ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008; 353-7.

4.   Brown TR, Lee C. Conference summary on prostate growth and aging. 13-15 September 2000. The prostate 2001; 48: 54-65.

5.   Terris MK, Stamey TA. Determination of prostate volume by transrectal ultrasound. J Urol 1991; 145: 984-7.

6.   Aarnink RG, Huynen AL, Giesen RJ, de la Rosette JJ, Debruyne FM, Wijkstra H. Automated prostate volume determination with ultrasonographic imaging. J Urol 1995; 153: 1549-54.

7.   Iqbal SA, Kumar RR, Beck R, Iacovou J. Prostate specific antigen (PSA) – to test or not to test. Bangladesh J Urology 2005; 8: 9-11.

8.   Loeba S, Kettermanna A, Cartera HB, Ferruccib L, Metterb EJ, Walsha PC. Prostate volume changes over time: results from the baltimore longitudinal study of aging. J Urol 2009; 182: 1458-62.

9.   Begum S. An anatomical study of age changes of prostate in Bangladeshi people. (M.Sc. Thesis). Dhaka: IPGMR, University of Dhaka 1991; 37.

10.Sech S, Montoya J, Girman CJ, Rhodes T, Roehrborn CG. Inter examiner reliability of transrectal ultrasonography to estimate prostate volume. J Urol 2001; 166: 125-9.

11.Moore RA. The evolution and involution of the prostate gland. Am J Path 1936; 12: 599-624.

12.Jakobsen H, Torp-Pedersen S, Juul N. Ultrasonic evaluation of age-related human prostate growth and development of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Scan J Urol Nephrol Suppl 1988; 107: 26-31.

13.Gearhart JP, Yang A, Leonard MP, Jeffs RD, Zerhouni EA. Prostate size and configuration in adults with bladder exstrophy. J Urol 1993; 149: 308-10.

14.Benaim EA, Montoya JD, Saboorian MH, Litwiller S, Roehrborn CG. Characterization of prostate size, PSA and endocrine profiles in patients with spinal cord injuries. Prostate Cancer Prostate Dis 1998; 1: 250-5.

15.Chicharro-Molero JA. Burgos-Rodriguez R. Sanchez-Cruz JJ, del Rosal-Samaniego JM, Rodero-Carcia P, Rodriguez-Vallejo JM. Prevalence of benign prostatic hyperplasia in spanish men 40 years old or older. J Urol 1998; 159: 878-82.

16.Zackrisson B, Hugosson J and Aus G. Transrectral ultrasound anatomy of the prostate and seminal vesicles in healthy men. Scand J Urol Nephrol 2000; 34: 175-80.

17.Overland GB, Vatten L, Rhodes T, DeMuro C, Jacobsen G, Vada K et al. Lower urinary tract symptoms, prostate volume and uroflow in Norwegian community men. Eur Urol 2001; 39: 36-41.